Ibogaine

Detoxification from methadone using low, repeated, and increasing doses of ibogaine: A case report

This case report (2017) explores using low, repeated, and increasing doses of ibogaine for someone who is heroin-dependent and is currently undergoing methadone maintenance treatments (MMT). It found that every administration of ibogaine reduced the withdrawal symptoms for several hours, and attenuated the tolerance to methadone until all withdrawal symptoms vanished with no serious adverse effects at the end of the treatment. This is the first such case report on ibogaine treatment using low and cumulative doses for MMT.

Authors

  • José Carlos Bouso
  • Rafael Guimarães dos Santos

Published

Journal of Psychedelic Studies
individual Study

Abstract

Background and aims: Ibogaine is a natural alkaloid that has been used in the last decades as an adjuvant for the treatment of opiate withdrawal. Despite the beneficial results suggested by animal studies and case series, there is a lack of clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of ibogaine. Moreover, the majority of reports described cases of heroin-dependent individuals, with and without concomitant use of methadone, using high doses of ibogaine. Therefore, it is not clear if ibogaine at low doses could be used therapeutically in people on methadone maintenance treatments (MMT).Methods: Case report of a female on MMT for 17 years who performed a self-treatment with several low and cumulative doses of ibogaine over a 6-week period.Results: The patient successfully eliminated her withdrawals from methadone with ibogaine. Each administration of ibogaine attenuated the withdrawal symptoms for several hours, and reduced the tolerance to methadone until all signs of withdrawal symptoms disappeared at the end of the treatment. No serious adverse effects were observed, and at no point did the QTc measures reach clinically significant scores. Twelve months after the treatment, she was no longer on MMT.Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing an ibogaine treatment using low and cumulative doses in a person on MMT. Although preliminary, this case suggests that low and cumulative doses of ibogaine may reduce withdrawal symptoms in patients undergoing MMT.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Detoxification from methadone using low, repeated, and increasing doses of ibogaine: A case report'

Introduction

Opioid misuse, including misuse of prescription opioids such as methadone, has risen sharply in recent years and contributes substantially to overdose mortality and morbidity in Europe and North America. Conventional strategies endorsed by the World Health Organization are gradual dose reduction or opioid substitution treatment (OST) with methadone or buprenorphine; OST reduces harms but often becomes long-term and is associated with persistent medical, cognitive, and quality-of-life problems for some patients. Ibogaine, an alkaloid from Tabernanthe iboga, has shown anti-withdrawal effects in animal models and long-standing anecdotal and case-series evidence in humans, but safety concerns (notably bradycardia and QTc prolongation) and a lack of controlled clinical trials limit its acceptance. Typical therapeutic regimens have used single high doses (around 15–20 mg/kg), and fatalities related to cardiac arrhythmia and comorbid factors have been reported. A recent noribogaine trial in people switched from methadone to morphine showed no reduction in withdrawal at the doses tested and raised the possibility that repeated dosing or different dosing regimens might be required. This report describes a single-case attempt to detoxify a long-term methadone patient using a protocol of low, repeated, and progressively increasing oral doses of ibogaine administered intermittently while methadone doses were reduced. The authors present clinical procedures, monitoring, adverse effects, and follow-up up to 12 months, with the aim of exploring whether a lower-dose, cumulative ibogaine strategy might reduce withdrawal symptoms and methadone dependence while improving safety compared with single high-dose approaches.

Methods

This paper is a case report of a 47-year-old woman (58 kg) who had been on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) for 17 years following past heroin dependence. At the time of the intervention she was stabilised on 37 mg methadone daily and reported occasional intranasal heroin and amphetamine use, daily cannabis, and a history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Baseline laboratory screening covered >70 parameters including full blood count, biochemistry, hormones, coagulation and serology; abnormalities were minor and without clinical significance. Baseline electrocardiogram (EKG) gave QTc 425 ms, blood pressure 120/70 mm Hg and heart rate 85 bpm. A structured psychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.) produced no psychiatric diagnosis. Outcome and safety measures included the Opiate Withdrawal Scale (OWS) administered daily, the Short OWS (SOWS) before and serially after each ibogaine session, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) before and serially after sessions and every morning during treatment, and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effects Rating Scale (UKU-SERS) for 24 hours post-session. Physiological monitoring comprised blood pressure and heart rate every 30 min for the first 4 hr, then hourly to 16 hr and at 18 and 24 hr; EKG and QTc measurement were recorded every 60 min for the first 8 hr and at later prespecified time points up to 24 hr. Psychological support was provided throughout and psychotherapy continued for 3 months post-treatment. Treatment was conducted remotely: the patient coordinated with the ICEERS Support Service and clinicians from Pangea Biomedics (a Mexican clinic experienced in ibogaine treatments). Financial constraints prevented travel, so the first four ibogaine sessions had medical supervision but the overall process was overseen live via Skype with local monitoring in Spain. Pharmaceutical-grade ibogaine hydrochloride (96.3% purity by chromatographic and spectrometric analysis) was donated and used orally in a regimen of low, increasing doses (five administrations in total) alternated with progressively reduced methadone doses. The protocol began with a 150 mg dose taken when withdrawal became physiologically evident (OWS 23; SOWS 9). Subsequent exposures were 300, 400, 500 and 600 mg, with methadone often halved between sessions (for example from 37 to 18 mg then stopped). Inter-dose intervals varied from 3 to 7 days according to the patient’s schedule. An EKG machine with QTc readout was used for cardiac monitoring throughout the sessions. The authors report that the first four sessions had direct medical supervision; later sessions were supervised remotely.

Results

Each ibogaine administration produced attenuation or temporary elimination of methadone withdrawal symptoms. With the initial 150 mg dose the patient’s SOWS fell from 9 to 0 within 1 hr, but withdrawal symptoms reappeared approximately 21 hr later (OWS 24). Repeating the pattern with higher incremental doses (300, 400, 500 and finally 600 mg) while reducing methadone ultimately led to the cessation of abstinence syndrome (AS) after the 600 mg dose; the AS did not return thereafter. The extracted text does not give a full time series for the 600 mg dose but reports sustained resolution of withdrawal at the end of the treatment. Lower doses reportedly lacked visual/psychedelic effects but were associated with surfacing of repressed memories and emotions without distressing psychiatric reactions. Safety monitoring recorded a fall in heart rate during the 400 and 500 mg doses, from 85 to 53 bpm within 2–3 hr; sitting or standing increased the heart rate. QTc prolongation did not reach clinically significant thresholds at any time; the highest recorded QTc was 444 ms at 3 hr after the 500 mg dose. On the UKU side-effect scale (severity 1–3) fatigability, memory impairment, akathisia and orthostatic dizziness were rated 1; constipation and tension headache were rated 2; reduction in sleep duration was rated 3; other assessed side effects were rated 0 and no clear dose–response for side effects was reported. The BPRS showed no psychiatric adverse effects. The patient used diazepam 2 mg after the first session to aid sleep and later took orally administered cannabis oil; following recovery from the final session she discontinued methadone, benzodiazepines and cannabis oil. On follow-up, 12 months after the intervention the patient remained off MMT and reported no symptoms of post-acute withdrawal syndrome (PAWS), reduced frequency of other drug use and improvements in life functioning (resuming study, music and volunteering). A laboratory panel performed 7 months post-treatment showed all parameters within reference intervals, although exact post-treatment HCV viral load was not reported in the extracted text.

Discussion

The authors frame this as the first reported application of a protocol using low, multiple, ascending doses of ibogaine given intermittently between decreasing methadone doses for research and clinical outcome purposes. They suggest this strategy may offer a more rapid alternative to conventional methadone detoxification, which is often prolonged and associated with protracted PAWS, and argue that ibogaine—in contrast to α2-adrenergic agents that reduce but do not eliminate withdrawal—appears capable of significantly reducing or removing abstinence symptoms in this case. Safety considerations are emphasised: even low ibogaine doses can prolong QTc and cause bradycardia, which can be life-threatening. The authors therefore insist that any low-dose protocol must be medically supervised with cardiac monitoring. They also note confusion in the literature because reports often do not distinguish methadone-dependent from heroin-dependent patients, complicating interpretation of prior failures. Mechanistic discussion centres on the complex pharmacology of ibogaine and its principal metabolite noribogaine, which interact with multiple receptors including μ and κ opioid sites and can increase brain-derived neurotrophic factor. The authors hypothesise that repeated dosing may allow accumulation of noribogaine to levels needed to reverse tolerance in long-half-life opioid dependence, whereas a single large dose may be insufficient in the presence of methadone’s prolonged elimination. They contrast this case with a noribogaine trial that failed to reduce withdrawal, suggesting differences in neuropharmacology, dose, or the need for both ibogaine and noribogaine effects acting together. Practical implications discussed include alternating ibogaine with short methadone intervals to improve tolerability, and the possible adjunctive role of benzodiazepines or cannabis for insomnia or stimulant side effects. The authors call for controlled clinical trials comparing single versus multiple dosing regimens to establish safety and efficacy and acknowledge that the mechanisms remain incompletely understood and that cardiac risks and literature heterogeneity represent key limitations of current evidence.

View full paper sections

RESULTS

The patient successfully eliminated her withdrawals from methadone with ibogaine. Each administration of ibogaine attenuated or even eliminated the withdrawal symptoms for many hours (see Figure; there are no data for the 600 mg dose), and reduced the tolerance to methadone until all signs of withdrawal symptoms disappeared at the end of the treatment. The lower ibogaine doses taken by the patient were apparently devoid of visual effects, yet repressed memories and emotions did surface. There were no psychiatric effects according to the BPRS. There were few side effects according to the UKU. In a scale of gravity from 1 to 3, fatigability, memory impairment, akathisia, and orthostatic dizziness were rated as 1, constipation and tension headache were rated as 2, and reduction in the duration of sleep was rated as 3. The rest of the eventual side effects assessed by the UKU were rated as 0, and there was no dose effect. In fact, the most uncomfortable side effect reported by the patient was difficulty in sleeping after each ibogaine session, so the patient decided to use a benzodiazepine (diazepam 2 mg) after the first ibogaine session. After the other ibogaine sessions, she took cannabis oil orally acquired from her Cannabis Social Club in Barcelona, Spain (note: in Spain, the personal use and acquisition of cannabis in these clubs is not a criminal offense). After recovering from the last ibogaine session, she did not continue using methadone, benzodiazepines, nor cannabis oil. Regarding QTc and BP, there were no clinically significant decrements. HR dropped with the 400 and 500 mg doses from 85 to 53 bpm between the first 2-3 hr. However, sitting or standing up effectively increased HR. At no point did the QTc measures reach clinically significant scores. The highest score (444 ms) was reached with the 500 mg dose at 3 hr. The ibogaine sessions appeared to lack visionary content, although she had psychological insights regarding biographical events with emotional, non-distressing reactions. The patient reported feeling comfortable, relaxed, and During this report, 12 months after the ibogaine treatment, she was no longer an MMT patient, and was without any symptoms of post-acute withdrawal syndrome (PAWS). Her life has improved in several ways (such as beginning to study, play music, and volunteer again), and her frequent use of drugs has been reduced. In an analytical test that the patient completed 7 months after the treatment, all the parameter values were within the IRs, including those that were not prior to the treatment. According to the patient, this analysis was the only one in the last 17 years where all the parameters were within the normal ranges, although the exact HCV viral load was not measured in the analysis.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first time that a protocol based on low and multiple doses of ibogaine administered intermittently between decreasing methadone doses has been performed to detoxify from methadone for the purposes of research and better outcomes. Standard treatments for detoxifying from methadone require many months to complete, and patients consider it significantly more difficult, with more protracted PAWS symptoms than that of heroin or other short-acting opioids. The protocol based on low, multiple, ascending doses of ibogaine may provide a relatively brief but successful alternative to classical methods based on conventional detoxification. In addition, contrary to alpha2-adrenergic drugs that reduce abstinence symptoms but do not eliminate it, ibogaine seems to significantly reduce and even eliminate AS, returning the system to its normal physiological state. Because even very low doses of ibogaine may induce prolongations in the QTc interval and lower HR, which may be life-threatening, it is critical and absolutely required that protocols based on low doses must be medically supervised. The ibogaine literature is confusing regarding its efficacy with methadone-dependent patients because authors do not differentiate methadone-dependent from heroindependent patients, making it impossible to know precisely whether those for whom the treatment failed were dependent on methadone or not. According to the experience of the clinicians at Pangea Biomedics, a singular large dose of ibogaine, even with supplemental doses, over a short period of time, does not completely eliminate the withdrawal symptoms of methadone, especially PAWS that are so common to MMT detoxification (unpublished observations). It is not well understood why ibogaine has withdrawalmitigating properties. Ibogaine and noribogaine have a complex neuropharmacology, binding to multiple brain receptors, among them μand κ-opioid receptors, and increasing brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Noribogaine, the principal metabolite of ibogaine, has been proposed as the molecule responsible for its anti-withdrawal effects. Earlier pharmacokinetics studies showed that the half-life of ibogaine was of 7.45 hr for extensive metabolizers, while noribogaine levels stayed in the 90% range of the C max for 24 hr after an oral administration of 500 mg (female) and 800 mg (male) of ibogaine. A recent study has found a mean plasma elimination of 28-49 hr across dose groups after administration of doses of 3, 10, 30, and 60 mg. This long action of ibogaine/noribogaine may explain the sustained anti-withdrawal effects of only one dose of ibogaine administered to heroin and/or other short-acting opiate users. In this case report, the withdrawal symptoms appeared again after 6 hr with the initial lower dose, and after almost 24 hr following the incremental doses. There are several possible explanations for that. First, although it has generally been established that the half-life of methadone is 24 hr, a recent pharmacokinetic study found a mean elimination half-life of 59 hr in methadone-dependent patients, so it is possible that one administration of ibogaine could be insufficient, in pharmacokinetic terms, to completely counteract the effects of methadone withdrawal symptoms. Complementarily, the former studies of Ciba Pharmaceuticals showed that ibogaine reduced morphine tolerance (United States Patent Office, 1957), so it is possible that ibogaine could also reduce methadone tolerance. Therefore, in this case report, progressively increasing ibogaine doses could produce an accumulation of noribogaine in the organism, and thus the withdrawal symptoms would take longer to reappear until they completely disappeared after multiple increasing doses. Finally, there is a discrepancy between this case and the lack of significant effects in the only clinical trial that assessed the anti-withdrawal properties of noribogaine. Noribogaine and ibogaine have a different neuropharmacology. A recent study using oral doses of noribogaine in rodents found that it is necessary to administer high doses of noribogaine to reduce withdrawal symptoms (the half-efficacious dose was 13 mg/kg). It is possible that it may be necessary to combine both the effects of ibogaine and noribogaine to obtain a complete anti-withdrawal effect. A recent study showed that noribogaine, in contrast to ibogaine, is a weak μ-opioid receptor antagonist and an efficient κ-opioid receptor agonist. Since ibogaine and noribogaine have different actions on the brain, it could be speculated that both of them "cooperate" to reach a final anti-withdrawal effect, at least in patients dependent on opioids with a long half-life. Thus, it is possible that because of the agonist action of ibogaine at μ-opioid receptor subjects may first experience a relief of withdrawal effects, and the action of noribogaine on κ-opioid receptors may be the responsible mechanism for reversing tolerance. This suggests that it may not be necessary to use high doses of ibogaine to briefly reverse withdrawal, and that repeated doses of ibogaine would be necessary to reverse tolerance in methadone-dependent patients, so that noribogaine can sufficiently accumulate in the brain until reaching the necessary levels to completely reverse/eliminate withdrawal symptoms. Because of the undesirable side effects of ibogaine, including emotional and memory processing, even at low doses, it is more tolerable for the patient to alternate the doses of ibogaine with periods of methadone, thereby progressively reducing the opioid dose until dependence has definitively been eliminated, and psychological integration is achieved. The use of benzodiazepines may be indicated to counteract insomnia and psychostimulant side effects. Our patient preferred to use legal cannabis, which may have anti-withdrawal properties as well. Clinical trials comparing single doses with multiple doses of ibogaine are necessary to establish which approach is the safest and most efficient in treating opioid withdrawal and dependence.

Study Details

Your Library