Psychoplastogens: A Promising Class of Plasticity-Promoting Neurotherapeutics
This review (2018) describes psychedelics, ketamine, and a range of other substances as psychoplastogens (i.e., substances that help the brain increase its plasticity and thereby enable therapeutic change).
Abstract
Neural plasticity - the ability to change and adapt in response to stimuli - is an essential aspect of healthy brain function and, in principle, can be harnessed to promote recovery from a wide variety of brain disorders. Many neuropsychiatric diseases including mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders arise from an inability to weaken and/or strengthen pathologic and beneficial circuits, respectively, ultimately leading to maladaptive behavioral responses. Thus, compounds capable of facilitating the structural and functional reorganization of neural circuits to produce positive behavioral effects have broad therapeutic potential. Several known drugs and experimental therapeutics have been shown to promote plasticity, but most rely on indirect mechanisms and are slow-acting. Here, I describe psychoplastogens - a relatively new class of fast-acting therapeutics, capable of rapidly promoting structural and functional neural plasticity. Psychoplastogenic compounds include psychedelics, ketamine, and several other recently discovered fast-acting antidepressants. Their use in psychiatry represents a paradigm shift in our approach to treating brain disorders as we focus less on rectifying chemical imbalances and place more emphasis on achieving selective modulation of neural circuits.
Research Summary of 'Psychoplastogens: A Promising Class of Plasticity-Promoting Neurotherapeutics'
Introduction
Neural plasticity—the capacity of the brain to change its structure and function in response to experience—is central to healthy cognition and behaviour, and its dysregulation underlies many neuropsychiatric conditions. Olson frames several mood, anxiety and substance use disorders as disorders of maladaptive circuit strength: circuits promoting harmful responses are potentiated while those that support adaptive behaviour are weakened. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus are highlighted because structural atrophy in these regions, including dendritic retraction and spine loss, is a hallmark of depression and is thought to disrupt mood-regulating circuits. While protein trophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) can reverse these changes experimentally, their pharmacokinetic limitations motivate a search for small molecules that cross the blood–brain barrier and promote plasticity. This paper introduces and motivates the concept of "psychoplastogens," a proposed class of small-molecule, fast-acting therapeutics that rapidly induce measurable structural and functional plasticity and produce relatively long-lasting behavioural effects after a single administration. Olson sets out to describe this class, distinguish it from slower-acting plasticity-promoting drugs, and review evidence that certain agents—including ketamine, scopolamine, GLYX-13 (rapastinel), and serotonergic psychedelics—meet the proposed criteria and hold therapeutic promise for disorders such as depression, PTSD and substance use disorders. The paper also highlights mechanistic hypotheses and translational opportunities and cautions about potential risks of this approach.
Methods
The extracted text does not present a dedicated Methods section or describe a formal systematic search strategy; the article reads as a narrative review and perspective drawing on cellular, animal and human findings. Evidence discussed includes in vitro neuronal assays (neurite growth, spine and synapse measures), in vivo rodent experiments (dendritic spine density, electrophysiology, behavioural assays such as fear extinction and forced swim test), and selected human clinical observations (antidepressant and PTSD-related outcomes). Because methodological details for literature identification, inclusion criteria, or quality appraisal are not provided in the extracted text, it is not possible to reconstruct a reproducible review protocol from this document. Instead, Olson synthesises representative mechanistic and translational data to define the psychoplastogen concept, to illustrate pharmacological classes that show rapid plasticity-promoting effects, and to outline mechanistic pathways (notably mTOR signalling downstream of glutamate and AMPA receptor activation).
Results
Olson defines psychoplastogens as small molecules that induce a measurable change in neural plasticity—such as alterations in neurite growth, dendritic spine density, synapse number or intrinsic excitability—within a short timeframe (typically 24–72 hours) after a single administration, and that produce behavioural changes persisting beyond the acute pharmacological effect. This contrasts with traditional antidepressants, which also promote plasticity but do so slowly and require chronic dosing. Representative agents discussed include ketamine, scopolamine, GLYX-13 (rapastinel), and serotonergic psychedelics. Ketamine is presented as a prototypical psychoplastogen: a single exposure promotes dendritic spine growth and synaptogenesis in the PFC within 24 hours, paralleling its rapid antidepressant effects. Scopolamine and GLYX-13 are cited as other fast-acting examples with reported plasticity-related and antidepressant effects. Serotonergic psychedelics receive detailed attention. Cellular and in vivo data indicate that compounds such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and related tryptamines increase dendritic branching and spine/synapse number in cultured cortical neurons and in animal cortex. Olson's group focused on DMT for mechanistic and practical reasons: DMT is a simple tryptamine scaffold, and a single intraperitoneal injection in rats increased PFC spine density and excitatory synaptic activity 24 hours later despite a short systemic half-life (~15 minutes in rats), implying durable plasticity rather than acute drug action. Behavioural correlates reported include enhanced fear extinction and reduced immobility in the forced swim test in rodents. In humans, ayahuasca (a DMT-containing brew) is noted to produce rapid and sustained antidepressant effects in clinical observations. Beyond mood disorders, psychoplastogens appear to facilitate fear extinction learning, a mechanism relevant to PTSD and to the attenuation of drug-cue memories implicated in addiction. MDMA is noted to promote fear extinction in rodents and to show clinical promise for PTSD when used in a pharmaceutical-enhanced psychotherapy paradigm. Olson also suggests broader therapeutic possibilities, including recovery after stroke, traumatic brain injury and in neurodegenerative disease, citing parallels with slower-acting plasticity agents such as fluoxetine. Mechanistically, many psychoplastogens increase glutamate release, which activates AMPA receptors and stimulates the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, a central regulator of protein synthesis and synaptogenesis. Different psychoplastogens act upstream via distinct receptors—ketamine via NMDA receptor antagonism, psychedelics via 5-HT2A receptor agonism, scopolamine via muscarinic antagonism—but converge on glutamatergic signalling and mTOR activation. Olson emphasises the importance of circuit specificity: whereas broadly acting TrkB agonists solve BDNF delivery problems, they lack anatomical selectivity and could produce maladaptive plasticity if applied indiscriminately. Psychedelics may offer inherent cortical selectivity because 5-HT2A receptors are highly expressed on layer V pyramidal neurons, localising psychoplastogenic effects to cortical areas like the PFC and potentially sparing mesolimbic reward circuitry. Potential risks and constraints are discussed. Excessive mTOR activation has been associated with neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative conditions, and excessive glutamate release can cause excitotoxicity and neuronal atrophy. Indiscriminate augmentation of plasticity in reward pathways could increase addiction risk, while activation of peripheral targets might promote adverse effects such as chronic pain. Olson highlights the importance of dose and dosing frequency in balancing efficacy and safety and notes ongoing efforts by academic and industry groups to develop compounds that retain psychoplastogenic efficacy with improved safety and circuit specificity.
Discussion
Olson interprets the emerging psychoplastogen literature as supporting a paradigm shift in neuropsychiatric therapeutics—from a narrow focus on correcting monoamine ‘‘imbalances’’ to strategies aimed at selective modulation and remodelling of neural circuits. The author argues that fast-acting small molecules that rapidly induce plasticity can enable environmental or behavioural inputs (for example, extinction training or psychotherapy) to reshape circuits more effectively than either intervention alone. Relative to earlier research, the paper positions psychoplastogens as distinct from traditional antidepressants because of their rapid onset of plasticity and longer-lasting behavioural effects after single exposures. Ketamine is presented as a catalytic discovery that catalysed interest in other fast-acting agents, while psychedelics and other compounds expand the mechanistic repertoire for inducing plasticity. Olson acknowledges uncertainties and limitations: the review does not provide a systematic evidence synthesis, many mechanistic links are inferred from preclinical models, and translational gaps remain around dosing, safety, and determining which clinical indications will benefit most. Clinical and research implications emphasised by the author include pursuing a deeper mechanistic understanding of mTOR signalling in the brain to develop safer psychoplastogenic drugs, designing agents with circuit selectivity to avoid maladaptive plasticity (for instance in mesolimbic pathways), and integrating psychoplastogens with behavioural therapies to capitalise on their window of enhanced plasticity. The discussion also calls for careful assessment of risks associated with mTOR overactivation and glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity, and for optimising dosing regimens to maximise durable benefit while minimising harm. Finally, Olson frames psychoplastogens not only as therapeutic candidates but as valuable tools for probing the basic biology of neural plasticity and for guiding the next generation of treatments for neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases.
View full paper sections
SECTION
Behavior is ultimately controlled by a combination of activity in a variety of neural circuits distributed across the brain. In several disease states, circuits that drive maladaptive behaviors are potentiated, whereas those that are more constructive become weakened. Juvenile brains are remarkably plastic and given an appropriate stimulus can often rebalance these circuits. However, after the closure of critical periods, adult brains become far less plastic making it necessary to artificially promote plasticity to repair damaged circuits. In principle, interventions that promote plasticity and enable the rebalancing of neural circuits can be used to treat a variety of brain diseases. Stress-related mood and anxiety disorders are particularly good examples of diseases resulting from circuit imbalances and thus are ideally suited to highlight plasticity-related strategies for improving brain health. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a critical role in the topdown control of fear and reward and thus it is of central importance to the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. In fact, one of the hallmarks of depression is the retraction of dendrites and loss of dendritic spines and synapses in the PFC. These structural phenotypes are thought to underlie circuit-level changes leading to behaviors characteristic of the disease. The neurotrophic hypothesis of depression posits that loss of trophic support in areas of the brain such as the PFC and the hippocampus leads to atrophy of these brain regions, which ultimately disrupts critical mood-regulating circuits. Direct infusion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) into the PFC or hippocampus is known to produce antidepressant/ anxiolytic effects in rodents. Unfortunately, the proteinaceous nature of BDNF imparts poor pharmacokinetic properties and renders it completely ineffective as a systemically administered central nervous system (CNS) therapeutic. Therefore, small molecules capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and activating plasticity mechanisms possess great medicinal value. Compound-induced neural plasticity, sometimes referred to as iPlasticity, is a well-established phenomenon occurring after treatment with several classes of small molecules.However, most of these compounds act through slow, indirect processes typically relying on the regulation of neurotrophic factors and other proteins critical for plasticity. Traditional antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclics, are some of the most efficacious plasticity-promoting compounds known. For example, traditional antidepressants increase the expression of BDNF and promote the growth of critical mood-regulating neurons in the PFC and hippocampus. In addition, fluoxetine can promote cortical remapping of ocular dominance columns and facilitate fear extinction learning.However, their effects on plasticity parallel their behavioral effects, which are quite slow and require chronic administration. Compounds that rapidly promote plasticity and produce beneficial, long-lasting behavioral changes represent an exciting advance over current plasticity-promoting medicines. The discovery that ketamine-a dissociative anestheticproduces fast-acting and relatively long-lasting antidepressant effects has had a profound impact on psychiatry and represents one of the field's most important findings in recent years. Ketamine promotes the growth of dendritic spines and the formation of synapses in the PFC within 24 hours of administration, 2 a period of time that correlates with its antidepressant effects. Moreover, it has long-lasting effects, implicating positive neural adaptations in the circuits critical for regulating mood. Although extremely promising, ketamine is far from an ideal therapeutic as it has the potential for abuse. Therefore, a substantial amount of effort has been directed toward the identification of compounds that mimic the beneficial effects of ketamine. To classify compounds like ketamine capable of altering neural circuits by rapidly promoting plasticity (Figure), and to distinguish them from other slow-acting molecules that induce plasticity, we have recently introduced the term "psychoplastogen," from the Greek roots psych-(mind), -plast (molded), and -gen (producing).By definition, psychoplastogens are small molecules and thus plasticity-promoting proteins like BDNF do not fall into this category. To be classified as a psychoplastogen, a compound should produce a measurable change in plasticity (eg, changes in neurite growth, dendritic spine density, synapse number, intrinsic excitability, etc.) within a short period of time (typically 24-72 hours) following a single administration. Because their impact on neural plasticity enables subsequent stimuli to reshape neural circuits, they should produce relatively long-lasting changes in behavior that extend beyond the acute effects of the drug. In addition to ketamine, several other psychoplastogens have been identified, all of which produce fast-acting antidepressant effects in humans.These include the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine, 5 the NMDA receptor partial agonist GLYX-13 (ie, rapastinel),and 5-HT2A receptor agonists such as psychedelics (Table). Recently, our group has demonstrated that psychedelic compounds such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), N,Ndimethyltryptamine (DMT), and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine promote dendritic branching and/or increase spine/ synapse number both in cultured cortical neurons and in vivo.These results provide a potential explanation for the known ability of these compounds to produce long-lasting changes in personality and positively impact circuits relevant to the treatment of mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Although our cellular studies have shown that a wide variety of psychedelic compounds produce psychoplastogenic effects similar to ketamine, our in vivo work thus far has primarily focused on the effects of DMT-the archetype for all tryptamine-containing psychedelics. Our initial efforts investigating the plasticity-promoting properties of psychedelics focused on DMT for a variety of reasons. First, the simple structure of DMT represents the minimal pharmacophore for all tryptamine-containing psychedelics as others such as LSD, ibogaine, psilocybin, and 5-MeO-DMT can be considered either conformationally restricted or substituted analogues of DMT.Like ketamine, 2 a single intraperitoneal injection of DMT increases dendritic spine density as well as the frequency and amplitude of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents in the PFC of rats 24 hours after administration. As the half-life of DMT in rats is on the order of 15 minutes, the compound is cleared from the body within 24 hours and thus these changes in neuronal structure and function must reflect plasticity and not simply the acute effects of the drug. Moreover, DMT produces behavioral effects in rodents that mirror those of ketamine such as promoting fear extinction learning and reducing immobility in the forced swim test.In humans, a DMT-containing tisane known as ayahuasca has been shown to produce rapid and sustained antidepressant effects.The use of a psychoplastogen to promote fear extinction learning is an excellent example of how small molecules can be used to rewire neural circuits. The PFC plays a critical role in encoding extinction memories and thus the administration of a psychoplastogenic compound shortly before extinction training can strengthen fear extinction memories more effectively than training alone. Like ketamine and DMT, the psychedelic 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has been shown to promote fear extinction learning in rodents. Furthermore, MDMA has demonstrated great promise in the clinic for treating PTSD via a treatment paradigm that can best be described as pharmaceutical-enhanced psychotherapy.The use of psychoplastogens to enhance fear extinction is gaining traction and in principle, the same strategy could be used to extinguish drug-cue memories. Perhaps, this is why psychedelic compounds such as DMT, ibogaine, and LSD have shown promise for treating substance use disorders. The true therapeutic potential of psychoplastogens is not known, but the possibilities are incredibly exciting and include the treatment of stroke, brain trauma, and neurodegenerative diseases. In fact, slow-acting plasticity-promoting compounds such as fluoxetine have already been used to promote functional recovery after brain insults.Mechanistically, psychoplastogens appear to induce changes in neuronal structure by activating the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-a key protein involved in cell growth, autophagy, and the production of proteins necessary for synapse formation.Many psychoplastogens including ketamine, psychedelics, and scopolamine increase the secretion of glutamate, which stimulates mTOR by activating AMPA receptors. However, many psychoplastogens alter perception or produce other undesired effects. A better mechanistic understanding of mTOR signaling in the brain could lead to the development of compounds with psychoplastogenic properties but better safety profiles. A number of companies and academic scientists are currently pursuing this strategy. The most useful psychoplastogens will be the ones capable of promoting plasticity in a circuit-specific manner. While brain-penetrant small molecule TrkB agonists solved the pharmacokinetic problem of using BDNF as a therapeutic, they do not offer any selectivity as TrkB is widely distributed throughout the brain and the periphery. Promoting plasticity indiscriminately is not likely to be beneficial. For example, increased plasticity in the mesolimbic pathway could lead to addiction, whereas activation of TrkB on nociceptors could result in chronic pain. In terms of developing circuit-specific psychoplastogens, psychedelics are extremely attractive starting points because they activate mTOR by stimulating 5-HT2A receptors-receptors that are highly expressed on layer V pyramidal neurons of the cortex. This genetic localization ensures that psychoplastogenic effects are localized to cortical regions like the PFC and could possibly explain why psychedelic compounds are not generally considered to be addictive (ie, they do not promote plasticity in the mesolimbic pathway). Although psychoplastogens offer many exciting possibilities for therapeutic interventions, it is important to consider the potential risks associated with promoting plasticity through the activation of mTOR. Excessive stimulation of mTOR has been associated with autism spectrum disorder and Alzheimer's disease,and therefore, more research needs to be done to firmly establish the risks and benefits associated with using these compounds. Many psychoplastogens cause the release of glutamate leading to trophic effects; however, excessive glutamate can result in excitotoxicity and neuronal atrophy. Therefore, the dose and frequency of administration will likely be critical to maximize efficacy while minimizing deleterious effects. The advent of psychoplastogenic compounds has enabled us to move beyond simplistic therapeutic strategies aimed at controlling monoamine levels toward the selective modulation of neural circuits-a fundamental shift in our approach to treating CNS disorders. Significant progress has been made in recent years and provides hope that modern research on ketamine, psychedelics, and other psychoplastogens will lead to safe and effective strategies for harnessing neural plasticity to treat mood and anxiety disorders such as depression and PTSD. As the number of psychoplastogenic compounds continues to grow, so do our chances of identifying the next generation of medicines for treating neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. Regardless, it is clear that psychoplastogens can serve as powerful tools for understanding the basic biology of neural plasticity.
Full Text PDF
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsliterature review
- Journal
- Compound