Depressive DisordersPsilocybin

Optimal dosing for psilocybin pharmacotherapy: Considering weight-adjusted and fixed dosing approaches

Post hoc analyses of 10 studies (N=288) administering 20–30 mg/70 kg psilocybin found no relationship between body weight (49–113 kg) or sex and acute subjective effects (mystical, challenging, intensity) under weight‑adjusted or approximated fixed (≈25 mg) dosing. These findings suggest fixed‑dose administration produces comparable subjective effects across weights and, given its greater convenience and lower cost, is preferable to weight‑adjusted dosing.

Authors

  • Albert Garcia-Romeu

Published

Journal of Psychopharmacology
individual Study

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence suggests psilocybin, a naturally occurring psychedelic, is a safe and promising pharmacotherapy for treatment of mood and substance use disorders when administered as part of a structured intervention. In most trials to date, psilocybin dose has been administered on a weight-adjusted basis rather than the more convenient procedure of administering a fixed dose. Aims: The present post hoc analyses sought to determine whether the subjective effects of psilocybin are affected by body weight when psilocybin is administered on a weight-adjusted basis and when psilocybin is administered as a fixed dose. Methods: We analyzed acute subjective drug effects (mystical, challenging, and intensity) associated with therapeutic outcomes from ten previous studies (total N = 288) in which psilocybin was administered in the range 20 to 30 mg/70 kg (inclusive). Separate multivariate regression analyses examined the relationships between demographic variables including body weight and subjective effects in participants receiving 20 mg/70 kg ( n = 120), participants receiving 30 mg/70 kg ( n = 182), and participants whose weight-adjusted dose was about 25 mg (to approximate the fixed dose that is currently being evaluated in registration trials for major depressive disorder) ( n = 103). Results: In the 20 mg/70 kg and 30 mg/70 kg weight-adjusted groups, and in the fixed dose group, no significant associations were found between subjective effects and demographic variables including body weight or sex. Across a wide range of body weights (49 to 113 kg) the present results showed no evidence that body weight affected subjective effects of psilocybin. Conclusions: These results suggest that the convenience and lower cost of administering psilocybin as a fixed dose outweigh any potential advantage of weight-adjusted dosing.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Optimal dosing for psilocybin pharmacotherapy: Considering weight-adjusted and fixed dosing approaches'

Introduction

Interest in classic psychedelics has increased because these compounds, which act primarily as serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2A R) agonists, show therapeutic promise for mood and substance use disorders. Psilocybin, a prodrug converted to psilocin, has produced moderate-to-large effect sizes in trials combined with supportive counselling and has yielded persistent benefits after one to a few administrations. Most clinical studies to date have used body weight-adjusted dosing (for example 30 mg/70 kg), but a fixed-dose approach would be operationally simpler and less costly; it remains uncertain whether weight-adjustment is necessary to achieve comparable subjective or therapeutic effects across people of differing body mass. Garcia-Romeu and colleagues set out to examine whether acute subjective effects of psilocybin vary as a function of body weight under both weight-adjusted and fixed-dose scenarios. Using pooled post hoc data from ten prior studies, the investigators focused on three specific questions: whether subjective effects vary with body weight at 20 mg/70 kg, at 30 mg/70 kg, and when participants received an absolute dose of about 25 mg (to approximate a fixed dosing regimen being used in registration trials). The analysis concentrates on acute subjective measures (mystical-type experiences, challenging experiences, and peak intensity) because these effects have been linked in prior work to subsequent therapeutic outcomes.

Methods

This report is a secondary, post hoc analysis of data pooled from ten studies conducted at Johns Hopkins between 2001 and 2018. The pooled sample comprised adults (total N = 288) who had received body weight-adjusted psilocybin doses within the 20 to 30 mg/70 kg range; institutional review board approval and informed consent were recorded in the original trials. Participants came from diverse study populations including healthy volunteers (with and without prior hallucinogen use), cigarette smokers seeking cessation, patients with life-threatening cancer-related distress, meditators, religious professionals, and people with major depressive disorder. Acute subjective outcome measures were the 30-item Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ30), the 26-item Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), and a single-item peak intensity rating (0–4). These instruments were administered at the end of the psilocybin session day, approximately 7 hours after capsule ingestion. A “complete mystical experience” on the MEQ30 was defined as scoring at least 60% of the maximum on each of the four subscales. Analyses used multivariate regression models in which the endogenous variables were MEQ30 total, CEQ total, and intensity (each standardised to unit variance), and exogenous predictors included age, race (coded white vs not white), sex, and body weight. Models were fit separately for three pooled subsets: sessions at 20 mg/70 kg (n = 120), sessions at 30 mg/70 kg (n = 182), and sessions with an absolute dose between 23 and 27 mg (inclusive; n = 103) to approximate a 25 mg fixed dose. Because absolute dose and weight are perfectly collinear in the weight-adjusted subsets, absolute dose was not included as an exogenous predictor in those models. Additional sensitivity models replaced weight with body mass index (BMI) for the 23–27 mg subset and included dummy codes for study membership; results of those supplemental models are reported as not substantively different. A Bonferroni-corrected alpha of p < 0.004 (0.05/12 comparisons) was used for statistical significance. Analyses were performed using the lavaan package in R and plotted with GraphPad Prism.

Results

Across the pooled datasets, no statistically significant associations emerged between participant demographics (age, race, sex, or body weight) and the acute subjective measures of psilocybin effects after correction for multiple comparisons. In the 20 mg/70 kg subset (n = 120), participants had a mean (SD) age of 42.2 (12.6) years and 53% were female. Body weight ranged from 49 to 111 kg, producing absolute doses from 14.0 to 31.6 mg. On average MEQ30 scores and intensity ratings were moderately high while CEQ scores were low to moderate. Multivariate regression models did not show significant relationships between MEQ30 total, CEQ total, or intensity and any demographic predictor, including weight. Models that included dummy variables for study membership produced substantively similar results, with one trial contributing to somewhat attenuated challenging-effect estimates (detailed in supplemental materials). In the 30 mg/70 kg subset (n = 182), mean (SD) age was 42.7 (12.2) years and 56% were female. Body weights spanned 49 to 113 kg, with absolute doses from 21.0 to 48.6 mg. Average MEQ30 scores and intensity ratings were high and CEQ scores remained low-to-moderate. Again, no significant associations were found between subjective measures and demographic variables, including weight. Inclusion of study dummy codes yielded similar outcomes, with one study showing attenuation of intensity ratings relative to others (see supplemental materials). For the subset receiving absolute doses between 23 and 27 mg (n = 103), body weights ranged from 54 to 94 kg. No significant associations were observed between MEQ30 total, CEQ total, or intensity and age, race, sex, weight, or BMI. Sensitivity models using BMI or study membership did not alter these conclusions. Across the full pooled range of body weights (49 to 113 kg), the analyses provided no evidence that body weight significantly affected the measured acute subjective effects of psilocybin. The extracted text does not report exact regression coefficients, confidence intervals, or p-values for individual predictors in the main text; the authors note no associations reached the corrected significance threshold.

Discussion

Garcia-Romeu and colleagues interpret these pooled post hoc findings as showing no meaningful relationship between participant body weight and acute subjective effects of psilocybin across weight-adjusted dosing at 20 mg/70 kg and 30 mg/70 kg and, in a smaller subsample, for absolute doses around 25 mg. Because acute mystical-type, intensity, and challenging experiences have been linked in earlier studies to therapeutic outcomes, the lack of weight-related differences suggests that fixed dosing may provide comparable subjective effects and, by implication, comparable therapeutic potential to weight-adjusted dosing. The investigators caution, however, that the present analyses are not definitive evidence favouring one dosing strategy. Analyses were post hoc and used data from studies that originally administered weight-adjusted doses, so direct prospective comparison of fixed versus weight-adjusted regimens was not performed. Most participants were healthy volunteers and the subsample approximating a 25 mg fixed dose was smaller, which the authors acknowledge may have limited statistical power to detect modest effects. Racial homogeneity (predominantly white participants) and other sampling constraints limit generalisability. The findings are presented as broadly consistent with a recent pharmacokinetic simulation suggesting a 25 mg fixed oral dose may yield psilocin exposures similar to a 0.3 mg/kg weight-adjusted dose, and with open-label reports of clinical improvement following fixed 25 mg dosing. The authors note trend-level indications—such as marginally higher self-reported challenging effects in women and a dose-related trend across 20 to 30 mg—that merit further investigation. They also emphasise substantial inter-individual variability in response that is independent of body weight, pointing to other influences (for example personality, acute mental state, environment or “set and setting”, genetic factors) that were not examined here but could affect safety and efficacy. Finally, the authors recommend prospective randomised studies comparing fixed and weight-adjusted dosing in clinically defined, more diverse populations and suggest incorporating pharmacogenetic and neurobiological assessments, as well as careful study of set and setting, to establish optimal dosing practices for therapeutic psilocybin administration.

View full paper sections

METHODS

Data were analyzed from ten studies conducted at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine between 2001 and 2018 (total N = 288), in which adults were administered body weightadjusted doses of psilocybin of 20 to 30 mg/70 kg (inclusive). These studies were approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board and all participants provided informed consent. We have focused specifically on psilocybin doses between 20 and 30 mg/70 kg as this range has been identified as safe and most likely to yield therapeutic outcomes in clinical populations, and positive persisting effects in healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Multivariate regression analyses were used to test for associations between subjective drug effects (i.e., mystical effects, challenging effects, and intensity) as endogenous variables and demographic variables (i.e., age, race, sex, and weight) as exogenous variables. Each endogenous variable was fixed to unit variance, whereas covariances between endogenous variables as well as variances and covariances of exogenous variables were estimated. Analyses were conducted separately in three subsets of pooled data: drug administration sessions in which participants received 20 mg/70 kg of psilocybin (n = 120), drug administration sessions in which participants received 30 mg/70 kg of psilocybin (n = 182), and drug administration sessions in which participants received an absolute dose between 23 and 27 mg (inclusive) of psilocybin (consisting of weight-adjusted doses between 20 and 30 mg/70 kg; n = 103). For the latter, these parameters (i.e., 23 to 27 mg) were chosen to provide as much clinically relevant data as possible within a constrained dose range approximating the 25 mg fixed dose being used in current clinical trials of psilocybin for depression. Some participants contributed data to more than one analysis. In the case that the same volunteer was administered a given dose of psilocybin on more than one occasion, only the responses and ratings from the first exposure to that given dose were used in these analyses. Analysis of the observations from 20 mg/70 kg dosing sessions and 30 mg/70 kg dosing sessions included participant weight as an exogenous variable, but did not include the absolute dose of psilocybin that was administered as an exogenous variable, because participant weight and absolute dose were perfectly collinear. Given the high prevalence of white volunteers, and the very low prevalence of volunteers endorsing any other race, race was coded as a dummy variable indicating white or not. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons provided an alpha level of p < 0.004 (i.e., .05/12 comparisons) for statistical significance. For the analysis of observations in which participants received an absolute dose of about 25 mg, separate models were fit including body mass index (BMI) instead of weight (Supplemental Materials). Additional models including dummy codes for study membership were estimated, and can be found in Supplemental Materials. Data were analyzed using the lavaan toolboxin R Statistical Software (v 3.5.0; R Core Team, 2018), and plotted using GraphPad Prism 8.4.1 for Mac (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA).

CONCLUSION

Post hoc analyses of pooled data from several previous studies that administered body weight-adjusted doses of psilocybin of 20 mg/70 kg and 30 mg/70 kg to participants with a 2.3-fold range of body weights (49 to 113 kg) found no significant associations between age, race, sex, or weight of the participant and psilocybin subjective effects. In a smaller subsample of individuals (n = 103) receiving 23 to 27 mg (inclusive) of psilocybin across a 1.7-fold range of body weights (54 to 94 kg), no significant associations were found between demographic variables (including body weight) and subjective drug effects. In neither the body weight-adjusted nor fixed dosing analyses did participant body weight have a significant impact on subjective drug effects of clinical relevance. Therefore, the results were somewhat mixed in the sense that the overall lack of significant effects did not provide definitive evidence supporting either weight-adjusted or fixed dosing. Contrary to the assumption implicit in most contemporary research with psilocybin, these findings do not indicate an advantage of weight-adjusted dosing over the simpler method of fixed dosing. In analyzing weight-adjusted doses in the 20 mg/70 kg and 30 mg/70 kg groups, we did not find significant evidence that weight-adjusted dosing produced unintended stronger effects in heavier individuals, which would be expected if weight-adjusted dosing was unnecessary to produce comparable effects across individuals of different body weights. However, in analyzing fixed doses approximating 25 mg, we also did not find significant evidence that lighter individuals showed stronger effects, which would be expected if weight-adjusted dosing was necessary to produce comparable effects across individuals of different body weights. Taken together, the present results suggest that with respect to subjective effects, and ostensibly clinical efficacy of psilocybin, the more convenient and less costly fixed dosing regimen may be as effective as weightadjusted dosing. Prospective research comparing weight-adjusted to fixed doses with regard to clinical efficacy in particular mental health conditions would be necessary to definitively demonstrate clinical superiority of either dosing strategy, which was not directly addressed in the present analysis that included mostly healthy volunteers and focused primarily on subjective drug effects. However, because research is currently underway examining clinical populations with fixed doses of psilocybin (e.g., NCT03866174 and NCT03775200), those studies have the potential to demonstrate efficacy of fixed psilocybin dosing, which would make rigorous comparison of weight-adjusted vs. fixed dosing unnecessary for future clinical practice. The present results are consistent with a recent pharmacokinetic study of psilocybin, which found in a simulated model that use of a fixed oral psilocybin dose of 25 mg may result in psilocin AUC and C max exposures similar to those from a weightadjusted (0.3 mg/kg) oral dose. Our findings are also consistent with results showing that fixed oral doses of 25 mg psilocybin were associated with decreased treatmentresistant depression symptoms, although participant body weight or BMI data for this trial were not reported. Psilocybin-occasioned increases in mindfulness have recently been found to correlate negatively with changes in 5-HT 2A R binding from pre-to post-psilocybin administration, suggesting potential biological and psychological therapeutic mechanisms of psilocybin. BMI, a measure closely related to body weight, has shown positive associations with 5-HT 2A R binding in the cortex, but no relationship to tobacco or alcohol use, highlighting the complexand). It is possible that the participants' greater prior hallucinogen use and younger age on average relative to participants from other studies might have influenced these outcomes (mean classic hallucinogen uses = 60.9; mean age = 28.5 years). There are some notable limitations regarding this study that constrain generalizability of the current findings. Analyses were conducted post hoc, and only data from weight-adjusted psilocybin sessions were available, thereby limiting the ability to provide decisive conclusions with regard to fixed dosing. The majority of the participants were healthy volunteers, raising further questions about applicability of findings to clinical populations. Prospective research is needed to compare weight-adjusted and fixed psilocybin dosing, preferably among a well-defined clinical population. Furthermore, the smaller sample size of individuals who received doses around 25 mg may have limited statistical power relative to other analyses presented, possibly hindering the ability to detect effects. Racial homogeneity of the majority white study samples examined here is another important limitation, and remains an ongoing challenge for clinical hallucinogen research that must be addressed as this work expands more broadly. Factors such as lack of sufficient funding for research on therapeutic effects of hallucinogens have made it difficult to recruit populations from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds, who are often unable to take time away from work or childcare responsibilities to participate in time-intensive research studies without financial compensation. In addition, underrepresentation of people of color in scientific and clinical research settings, and distrust of biomedical research institutions due to historical mistreatment of minority populations are also likely factors influencing the low prevalence of non-white participants in research studies like those presented here. These issues require long-term and systemic work to make substantive progress in equity of access, representation, and inclusion of people of color within research and medical settings, areas in which we are actively striving to make improvements. The present analyses found no evidence for sex differences in subjective effects of psilocybin. Trend level findings in the 20 mg/70 kg and restricted 25 mg psilocybin datasets suggested women may score marginally higher on self-reported challenging effects (CEQ) than men. It is possible that women were more likely to report feelings such as grief and physical distress than their male counterparts or felt more comfortable disclosing these due to cultural norms or expectations (e.g.,.found similar sex differences in the psychoactive effects of MDMA across studies using weightadjusted doses (N = 74), with female participants scoring higher on perceptual changes, thought disturbances, fear of loss of body control, and experiencing more adverse effects, while males exhibited greater acute increases in blood pressure. However, previous results from pooled analyses of psilocybin effects in 261 healthy volunteers found no significant sex differences in drug response. Thus, data indicate the possibility of sex differences in psilocybin effects that may have clinical relevance, a topic that should be explored further in future research. Previous studies in healthy volunteers that examined weightbased psilocybin doses over either a 2.7-fold rangeor a 6-fold rangeshowed that higher psilocybin doses were associated with stronger effects. The present study examining a 1.5-fold range of weight-based doses (from 20 to 30 mg/70 kg) showed only a dose-related trend (Table), which was consistent with the findings between these two doses in thestudy.additionally found that lower age was associated with greater psilocybin-related cognitive impairment and loss of selfcontrol, though we found no significant relationship between age and subjective effects. This discrepancy may be related to age differences between study samples, withparticipants having a mean (SD) age of 27.8 (6.0) years, compared with the current sample with mean (SD) ages from 42.2 (12.6) to 45.6 (12.4) years. Furthermore,found no significant associations between BMI and psilocybin response in healthy volunteers, congruent with our findings. Across a wide range of body weights (49 to 113 kg) the present results showed no evidence that body weight affected the subjective effects of psilocybin. From a logistic standpoint for medications development, fixed dosing of psilocybin is preferable because it allows for standardized manufacture of a single dose form, which is less costly and more convenient than body weight-adjusted dosing. However, our results also show substantial variability in response to psilocybin across individuals, independent of body weight, suggesting some patients may necessitate higher dosage in order to receive clinical benefit based on factors yet to be determined. Personality factors (i.e., absorption), mental state before drug sessions (e.g., emotional excitability), and environment in which the drug is administered (e.g., PET scanner) have been associated with subjective responses to psilocybin, consistent with long-standing assertions that psychedelic drug effects may be heavily influenced by extrapharmacological factors often referred to as "set and setting". Although we did not analyze such variables here, they clearly warrant careful additional consideration, along with other genetic, psychological, and diagnostic factors that may have an impact on the safety and efficacy of psilocybinassisted interventions. The present results strongly suggest that body weight is not a major factor in determining the subjective effects of psilocybin across a range of populations. These data indicate that administering a fixed dose of psilocybin may provide comparable subjective effects, and presumably clinical efficacy, as weight-adjusted dosing for future clinical work with psilocybin. Future trials should assess the clinical efficacy of fixed dosing with psilocybin in more diverse participant populations and should incorporate pharmacogenetic and neurological testing in addition to prospective research on optimal set and setting to inform best practices in the therapeutic administration of psilocybin.

Study Details

Your Library