Depressive DisordersAyahuascaAyahuasca

Modulation of Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor by a Single Dose of Ayahuasca: Observation From a Randomized Controlled Trial

This placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial study (n=73) investigated the impact of BDNF (a protein related to the growth of neurons) on patients with depression who were administrated ayahuasca. The trial results observed a potential link between the changes in serum BDNF levels and the antidepressant effects of ayahuasca and also supported using psychedelics as an antidepressant.

Authors

  • Fernanda Palhano-Fontes

Published

Frontiers in Psychology
individual Study

Abstract

Introduction: Serotonergic psychedelics are emerging as potential antidepressant therapeutic tools, as suggested in a recent randomized controlled trial with ayahuasca for treatment-resistant depression. Preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels increase after treatment with serotoninergic antidepressants, but the exact role of BDNF as a biomarker for diagnostic and treatment of major depression is still poorly understood.Methods: Here we investigated serum BDNF levels in healthy controls (N = 45) and patients with treatment-resistant depression (N = 28) before (baseline) and 48 h after (D2) a single dose of ayahuasca or placebo.Results: In our sample, baseline serum BDNF levels did not predict major depression and the clinical characteristics of the patients did not predict their BDNF levels. However, at baseline, serum cortisol was a predictor of serum BDNF levels, where lower levels of serum BDNF were detected in a subgroup of subjects with hypocortisolemia. Moreover, at baseline we found a negative correlation between BDNF and serum cortisol in volunteers with eucortisolemia. After treatment (D2) we observed higher BDNF levels in both patients and controls that ingested ayahuasca (N = 35) when compared to placebo (N = 34). Furthermore, at D2 just patients treated with ayahuasca (N = 14), and not with placebo (N = 14), presented a significant negative correlation between serum BDNF levels and depressive symptoms.Discussion: This is the first double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial that explored the modulation of BDNF in response to a psychedelic in patients with depression. The results suggest a potential link between the observed antidepressant effects of ayahuasca and changes in serum BDNF, which contributes to the emerging view of using psychedelics as an antidepressant. This trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02914769).

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Modulation of Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor by a Single Dose of Ayahuasca: Observation From a Randomized Controlled Trial'

Introduction

Serotonergic psychedelics are being investigated as potential rapid-acting antidepressants because they engage monoaminergic and neuroplasticity-related pathways implicated in major depression. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophin linked to synaptic plasticity and hippocampal/prefrontal structural changes observed in depression, and previous preclinical and clinical work suggests some antidepressants increase serum BDNF. However, the utility of peripheral BDNF as a diagnostic or treatment biomarker remains unclear, and few controlled clinical trials have examined whether psychedelic administration modulates BDNF in depressed patients. Leite Galvão-Coelho and colleagues set out to test whether a single dose of ayahuasca alters serum BDNF and whether baseline BDNF or its change relates to depressive symptoms. Using a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design in treatment-resistant depression and a healthy control group, the study tested (1) whether baseline BDNF discriminates patients from controls and relates to clinical features and cortisol, and (2) whether BDNF measured 48 hours after dosing differs between ayahuasca and placebo and predicts symptom change.

Methods

The investigators conducted a parallel-arm, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial at a university psychiatry clinic. Seventy-three volunteers were enrolled: 28 patients with treatment-resistant major depression (MD) and 45 healthy controls (CG). Treatment-resistant status required inadequate response to at least two antidepressants. All participants were ayahuasca- and psychedelic-naïve, at least 18 years old, without current substance dependence or pregnancy. Patients underwent a 2-week antidepressant washout prior to dosing. The trial was registered (NCT02914769) and approved by the institutional ethics committee. Participants were admitted the day before dosing for baseline assessment (D-1) and the dosing session took place on D0. Randomisation allocated volunteers 1:1 to a single oral dose of ayahuasca (1 ml/kg) or an organoleptic-matched placebo designed to mimic some gastrointestinal effects. Sessions lasted about 8 hours in a comfortable, supervised setting with a music playlist and supportive staff. Depression severity was measured with MADRS (and HAM-D at baseline), administered at D-1, D0 (pre-dose) and 48 hours after dosing (D2). Remission was defined as MADRS ≤10 at D2. Blood sampling for serum BDNF and cortisol occurred at D0 and D2 at 07:00 after an 8-hour fast to reduce circadian variability. Serum was processed and stored at −80 °C. BDNF was quantified by a sandwich ELISA (CYT306, Merck Millipore) and cortisol by a direct competitive ELISA (DGR-SLV 1887). Statistical analyses used SPSS 20 and graphics in R 3.4.1, with two-tailed significance at p ≤ 0.05. Serum BDNF and cortisol values were log-transformed for analysis. Baseline cortisol was categorised as hypocortisolaemia (≤15 µg/dL), eucortisolaemia (15–43 µg/dL) or hypercortisolaemia (>44 µg/dL); individuals with hypercortisolaemia were excluded from some analyses due to small numbers (MD = 0, CG = 4). The analytic strategy combined binary logistic regression to test predictors of diagnostic group and of remission, multi-linear regression to model predictors of baseline BDNF, and General Linear Models (GLM) with repeated measures to evaluate treatment (ayahuasca versus placebo), group (MD versus CG) and phase (D0, D2) effects on serum BDNF. Correlations used Spearman tests. Where noted, model selection used Akaike Information Criterion and the number of predictors was constrained by sample size.

Results

Sample characteristics showed that patients were older than controls (MD mean 41.57 ± 11.40 years; CG mean 31.56 ± 9.90 years) and that women predominated (MD 75%, CG 51.22%). All patients had failed at least two prior antidepressant trials and were off medication during the 2-week washout. At baseline, serum BDNF alone did not discriminate patients from controls (binary logistic regression: χ2 = 0.222, df = 1, p = 0.63). A multivariable model including sex, income, age and cortisol category became significant (χ2 = 19.13, df = 5, p = 0.002; Nagelkerke r2 = 0.32), with age the strongest predictor (B = -0.06, p = 0.02). When modelling predictors of baseline serum BDNF across all volunteers, the best (lowest AIC) model included only cortisol category, although with low discriminative power. Group comparisons indicated that volunteers classified as hypocortisolaemic (n = 31) had lower baseline serum BDNF than those with eucortisolaemia (n = 38) (Student t-test: t = -2.468, df = 67, p = 0.016). Within the eucortisolaemic subgroup there was a significant negative correlation between serum BDNF and cortisol (Spearman rho = -0.39, p < 0.05); this correlation was not significant in the hypocortisolaemic subgroup. Clinical characteristics of patients (disease duration, number of episodes, MADRS scores) did not predict baseline BDNF in tested models. Forty-eight hours after dosing (D2), participants who received ayahuasca (n = 35) had higher serum BDNF than those who received placebo (n = 34) (GLM Treatment effect: F = 4.81, df = 1, p = 0.03). The between-treatment effect size at D2 was reported as Cohen's d = 0.53 (medium). There were no significant main effects of group (MD vs CG), phase (D0 vs D2) or interactions involving group and phase. In the patient subgroup, those treated with ayahuasca (n = 14) showed a significant negative correlation at D2 between serum BDNF and MADRS scores (Spearman rho = -0.55, p ≤ 0.05), indicating higher BDNF associated with lower depressive symptoms; this correlation was not observed in patients given placebo (n = 14, rho = -0.27, p > 0.05). Regarding clinical outcome, the number of previous unsuccessful antidepressant treatments was the strongest predictor of remission at D2 (binary logistic regression: χ2 = 10.14, df = 1, p = 0.001; Nagelkerke r2 = 0.42; B = -1.48, p = 0.035). Patients who remitted at D2 (n = 11) had fewer prior unsuccessful trials (median/mean reported) than non-remitters (n = 17) (Mann-Whitney U = 33, p = 0.003). Models combining number of previous treatments and type of treatment improved fit modestly, but previous treatment burden remained the primary predictor. The authors note that in the parent clinical trial there was no significant difference in remission rates between ayahuasca and placebo at D2, with larger treatment effects emerging at D7; BDNF was not measured at D7 in this study. Some numerical reporting in the extracted text included apparent inconsistencies between means and confidence intervals for BDNF values; the extraction did not make all descriptive statistics entirely clear.

Discussion

Leite Galvão-Coelho and colleagues interpret their findings as evidence of a relationship between peripheral cortisol regulation and serum BDNF at baseline, and of an increase in serum BDNF 48 hours after a single ayahuasca dose. They highlight that individuals with hypocortisolaemia presented lower baseline serum BDNF than eucortisolaemic volunteers, and that within eucortisolaemic participants BDNF and cortisol were negatively correlated. The authors discuss this pattern in light of prior work proposing an inverted U-shaped relationship between cortisol and BDNF and molecular interactions between glucocorticoid receptors (GR) and TrkB signalling. The increase in serum BDNF after ayahuasca is considered notable because BDNF is mechanistically linked to neuroplasticity; the authors point to pharmacology of ayahuasca constituents (N,N-DMT as a 5-HT2A and σ1R agonist and β-carbolines as reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors and serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and to prior preclinical reports that harmine and related compounds can increase BDNF expression. They also note that ayahuasca produces an acute cortisol rise in these volunteers and suggest that cortisol modulation could be implicated in the pathway by which ayahuasca affects peripheral BDNF. Nevertheless, the investigators caution that neither baseline BDNF nor D2 BDNF predicted remission at D2; instead, remission was best predicted by the number of prior unsuccessful antidepressant treatments. They acknowledge several limitations: the 2-week washout may have been insufficient to reveal baseline BDNF deficits associated with untreated depression; a single-day, single-timepoint measurement of cortisol and BDNF limits assessment of circadian and day-to-day variability; the ELISA used measured total BDNF and did not distinguish precursor and mature isoforms (pro-BDNF versus m-BDNF), which have different biological actions; and genetic variants such as BDNF Val66Met were not assessed. The authors conclude that, while further preclinical and clinical work is needed to delineate mechanisms, the observed early association between ayahuasca administration and increased serum BDNF at 48 hours supports a potential neuroplasticity-related mechanism underlying its antidepressant effects.

View full paper sections

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found an interaction between serum BDNF and serum cortisol levels at baseline. The serum cortisol was predictor of baseline serum BDNF of volunteers. Individuals with hypocortisolemia, both patients and controls, presented lower serum BDNF levels when compared to volunteers with eucortisolemia (patients and controls). Moreover, we found a negative correlation between serum cortisol and serum BDNF in eucortisolemic volunteers. However, neither BDNF nor cortisol levels were predictors of major depression and none of the clinical characteristics of patients predicted their BDNF levels. Forty-eight hours after treatment (D2), we observed higher BDNF levels in both groups (patients and controls) who were treated with ayahuasca, compared to those treated with placebo. In addition, at D2 patients treated with ayahuasca, and not with placebo, presented a negative significant correlation between BDNF levels and MADRS scores. However, the number of previous unsuccessful antidepressant treatments was the main predictor of remission rates found at D2. These results corroborate in part our initial hypotheses. On one hand, we found a relationship between serum cortisol and serum BDNF at baseline. Among the various responses induced by the glucocorticoid, the direct modulation of cortisol on BDNF appears to be extremely significant in understanding the etiology and treatment of major depression. The expression of BDNF in the central nervous system is modulated by various brain molecules, including cortisol. It is known that one interaction between these two molecules occurs at the level of messenger RNA. It is observed that high concentrations of cortisol induce reduction of BDNF gene expression, and hippocampal and neocortex neurogenesis. Analogously, low concentrations of the cortisol interfere negatively in the expression of BDNF. An inverted U-curve relationship between cortisol and BDNF has been proposed, where intermediate levels of cortisol are the most suitable for the expression of BDNF. In addition, it is suggested that there is an interaction between TrkB and GR receptor activity. In order TrkB receptor to be activated by BDNF, the GR receptor must be coupled to the TrkB, forming a complex. When cortisol levels are high, cortisol binds to its GR receptor and removes it from the complex, reducing the potential response of BDNF. Therefore, the literature suggests that allostatic levels of cortisol are important to adequate BDNF expression and function. Herein, this hypothesis is corroborated by the model where baseline serum cortisol levels predict serum BDNF levels and by the negative correlation between BDNF and cortisol found only for eucortisolemic volunteers that consequently induced a baseline difference in serum BDNF levels of eucortisolemic and hypocortisolemic volunteers in our study. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is a broad-acting neurotrophin that plays important roles in protection, differentiation, viability and growth of new neurons, and its effects go beyond the central nervous system. Outside of nervous system, the BDNF is mainly synthesized in platelets, which also is the main storage site of peripheral tissues. Rodent studies point out to the existence of bidirectional transport of BDNF in the blood-brain barrier, and peripheral administration of BDNF enhances hippocampal neurogenesis in mice, indicating that blood levels of BDNF are significant for brain function. Recent evidence suggests that several pathways of neuronal plasticity are activated by psychedelic compounds. The induction of neuroplasticity and neurogenesis by psychedelics are a relevant aspect of their action as potential antidepressants since several studies have shown that the efficacy of clinical antidepressants is related to an increase in hippocampal plasticity induced after monoaminergic enhancement. Even though most studies suggest that the serum BDNF levels of patients with depression are significantly lower than healthy controls, this finding is not unanimous. In our study, baseline serum BDNF levels, baseline serum cortisol levels, sex and income did not predict major depression and we did not find any clinical characteristics that predict baseline levels of BDNF in the group of patients. Both results are opposite to our hypothesis. Here, the variable age could predict the presence of depressive symptoms. However, as our patients were older than controls, this find might be biased by this baseline difference. It has been speculated that wash-out periods may mask the expected reduced BDNF levels found in depression, as it is been proposed that antidepressants stimulate BDNF synthesis. In fact, studies indicate that the reduction of BDNF is most consistently observed after a 4week wash-out periodor in severe untreated patients. Herein, all patients were in a 2-week wash-out period, which might not have been enough to allow the detection of lower BDNF levels at baseline. Furthermore, there are still controversies regarding the correlation between blood and central BDNF levels. There is no consensus in the literature about how far human blood BDNF reflects accurately the concentration of BDNF in the central nervous system. Therefore, this could also explain why we did not find difference in BDNF levels between healthy controls and depressed patients and the baseline serum BDNF levels did not predict major depression in our study. In addition, it is important to note that more recently three isoforms of BDNF have been identified. The intracellular synthesis of BDNF is initiated as the pre-pro-BDNF precursor form, and then the pre-region is removed resulting in the pro-BDNF form, which after a new cleavage forms mature BDNF (m-BDNF) and BDNF pro-peptide. In vitro assays suggest that pro-BDNF is the major secreted form, not m-BDNF, but in the extracellular medium, the pro-BDNF may undergo cleavage by the action of plasmin. The pro-BDNF/m-BDNF ratio seems to be critical for the determination of physiological or pathological conditions. Increased pro-BDNF levels in the prefrontal cortex and ventral tegmental area, and reduced levels of m-BDNF in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus are observed in different studies using animal models of depression. Despite this, studies with humans that analyze pro-BDNF/m-BDNF ratio in blood are infrequent, and few studies showed changed ratio in patients with major depression. Both m-BDNF, BDNF pro-peptide and pro-BDNF can interact with Trk and p75 NTR receptor, although each one exhibits different biological activities. The m-BDNF has high affinity for TrkB receptorsand its activation has been implicated in neural excitability and increased synaptic strength. On the other hand, pro-BDNF and BDNF pro-peptide performs their biological actions mainly through the binding to p75NTR neurotrophin receptors and have been described as inhibitor of excitability and facilitators of synaptic depression. The commercial kit used in our study is not sensitive to different BDNF isoforms, and the measurement is related to the total BDNF amount of both isoforms. We initially supposed that ayahuasca would modulate BDNF levels, and this was observed. After dosing (D2) we found higher levels of BDNF in individuals treated with ayahuasca compared to placebo, regardless of the group (MD or CG). The between-treatment effect size was medium. Additionally, patients that were treated with ayahuasca, and not with placebo, presented a negative significant correlation between BDNF levels and MADRS scores at D2: higher serum BDNF levels were correlated with lower depression symptomatology after the session with ayahuasca. N, N-dimethyltryptamine (N,N-DMT), the main active compound of ayahuasca, activates 5-HT 2A and σ1R pathways involved in neuroplasticity. Ayahuasca also induces an acute increase of cortisol levels. Specifically, these same volunteers showed an increase of approximately 100% of salivary cortisol 1 h 40 min after ayahuasca intake, which probably was important to reach physiological levels of this hormone in hypocortisolemic volunteers. Thus, the cortisol pathway could be critically implied in the mechanism related to how ayahuasca modulation of BDNF molecule. Although this study suggests higher levels of BDNF in volunteers treated with ayahuasca than those treated with placebo, a detailed explanation of specific pathways possibly involved in ayahuasca modulation of serum BDNF expression needs further pre-clinical and clinical investigation. Nevertheless, the early association between ayahuasca treatment and BDNF found herein 48 h after the dosing session gives support to a potential mechanism behind the observed antidepressant effects of ayahuasca. In this sense, it is also important highlight that previous studies also described significant increases in serum BDNF levels just after a longer period of antidepressant treatment, i.e., after 8-12 weeks, only psychedelics with antidepressant potential that demonstrate rapid action via BDNF synthesis and secretion. However, at D2 neither serum BDNF levels nor the type of treatment (AYA or PLA) predicted remission rates at D2. It is important to highlight, however, that we did not observe a significant difference on remission rates at D2 between treatments (AYA and PLA) in our original clinical trial. In that study, the strongest effect size and a significant difference between treatments on response and remission rates were observed only at D7, and we did not measure BDNF at D7. On the other hand, the number of previous antidepressant treatments predicted remission rates at D2, where patients that were in remission at D2 had a smaller number of previous unsuccessful antidepressant treatments than patients that did not achieve remission. Despite previous findings indicating a positive correlation between antidepressant effects and the expression of BDNF, not all studies support this finding. Few studies using double-blind placebo-controlled design have investigated BDNF in major depression, and studies with psychedelic substances evaluating depression patients are scarce. Ketamine, an anesthetic with psychedelic proprieties, have been tested in MD patients and animal models, and patients with treatment resistant depression exhibited increased plasma BDNF after a ketamine session only in responders between 4 h after intake until 1 week later. In addition to some limitations discussed above, other restrictions in the present study should be considered. First, the genetic factor related to BDNF was not considered in this work. Some studies suggest that major depressive disorder is directly linked to single nucleotide functional polymorphism of BDNF, leading to valine (Val) substitution by methionine (Met) at codon 66 (Val66Met), and heterozygous patients presenting the Val66Met polymorphism have more promising responses to antidepressants when compared to Val/Val homozygotes. Second, serum cortisol and BDNF were measured only once, and considering that these molecules have circadian rhythm, studies that cover sequential measurements throughout the day and for different days could point to more precise results. This was the first double-blind randomized placebocontrolled trial for depression that investigated changes in BDNF levels after an intervention with a psychedelic substance. The results point to important observations, such as the report of different baseline serum BDNF levels in respect to serum cortisol, higher levels of BDNF in volunteers treated with ayahuasca than placebo 48 h after the dosing session, as well a clear association between higher serum BDNF and lower symptoms of depression at D2. Our results suggest a potential link between the observed antidepressant effects of ayahuasca and changes in serum BDNF, which contributes to the emerging view of using psychedelics as an antidepressant.

Study Details

Your Library