Microdosing psychedelics: Motivations, subjective effects and harm reduction
This survey study (n=525) found that the motivation for microdosing (psilocybin and LSD) was mainly to improve mental health, personal development, and cognitive enhancement. Four out of five participants used one or more harm reduction techniques on microdosing days (e.g. not dosing when unwell, no alcohol, avoiding driving).
Authors
- Amada, N.
- Jungaberle, H.
- Klein, M.
Published
Abstract
Background: In recent years there has been growing media attention on microdosing psychedelics (e.g., LSD, psilocybin). This refers to people routinely taking small doses of psychedelic substances to improve mental health and wellbeing, or to enhance cognitive performance. Research evidence is currently limited. This paper examines microdosing motivations, dosing practices, perceived short-term benefits, unwanted effects, and harm reduction practices.Methods: An international online survey was conducted in 2018 examining people's experiences of using psychedelics. Eligible participants were aged 16 years or older, had used psychedelics and could comprehend written English. This paper focuses on 525 participants who were microdosing psychedelics at the time of the survey.Results: Participants were primarily motivated to microdose to improve mental health (40%), for personal development (31%) and cognitive enhancement (18%). Most were microdosing with psilocybin (55%) or LSD/1P-LSD (48%). Principal components analysis generated three factors examining perceived short-term benefits of microdosing: improved mood and anxiety, enhanced connection to others and environment, and cognitive enhancement; and three factors examining negative and potentially unwanted effects: stronger-than-expected psychedelic effects, anxiety-related effects, and physical adverse effects. Most participants (78%) reported at least one harm reduction practice they routinely performed while microdosing.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that people microdosing are commonly doing so as a self-managed therapy for mental health, either as an alternative or adjunct to conventional treatments. This is despite psychedelics remaining prohibited substances in most jurisdictions. Recent findings from clinical trials with standard psychedelic doses for depression and anxiety suggest that a neurobiological effect beyond placebo is not unreasonable. Randomised controlled trials are needed, complemented by mixed methods social science research and the development of novel resources on microdosing harm reduction.
Research Summary of 'Microdosing psychedelics: Motivations, subjective effects and harm reduction'
Introduction
Microdosing psychedelics — the practice of taking sub-perceptual doses of substances such as LSD or psilocybin on a regular schedule, typically to improve mental health, wellbeing, or cognitive performance — has attracted substantial media attention and a growing self-reported user base. Despite this interest, empirical research into the motivations, dosing practices, perceived benefits, and potential harms of microdosing has remained sparse, with the evidence base largely anecdotal at the time of this study. This context coincided with renewed clinical investigation of psychedelics at standard therapeutic doses, including regulatory breakthroughs for psilocybin and the first phase III trials for anxiety and depression. This study aimed to characterise the real-world practices and experiences of people who microdose psychedelics through an international online survey, with particular attention to motivations, short-term perceived benefits, unwanted effects, and harm reduction strategies.
Methods
The Psychedelic Experiences Survey was an international online cross-sectional questionnaire conducted in late 2018, targeting current or recent psychedelic users including those who had microdosed. Recruitment was conducted via psychedelic community email lists, online discussion forums (including the microdosing subreddit), psychedelic non-profit organisations, and paid social media advertisements. Participants were eligible if they had microdosed a psychedelic in the preceding 12 months. Comparisons were made between participants who reported exclusively microdosing LSD/1P-LSD and those exclusively using psilocybin. Principal components analysis was applied to derive reliable scales capturing perceived benefits and unwanted effects. The Severity of Dependence Scale was included as a screen for potential adverse consequences of psychedelic use. Statistical analyses were conducted in Stata v13.0 using t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariate modelling.
Results
The sample of 525 participants had a mean age of 34.5 years and was predominantly male (73.5%), university-educated (52.8%), and based in the United States (48.2%). The most common primary motivation for microdosing was to address mental health or substance use concerns (40.4%), which was reported more frequently among psilocybin users than LSD users (47.1% vs 32.1%, p = 0.001). Personal and spiritual development was reported by 31.2%, and cognitive or professional enhancement by 18% of participants. Most participants had been microdosing for six months or fewer. Principal components analysis yielded three reliable benefit domains: improved mood and anxiety, enhanced connection to people and environment, and enhanced cognitive and other performance. Unwanted effects were similarly structured across three factors: potentially perceptual or psychedelic effects, anxiety effects, and unpleasant physical effects. Psilocybin users reported higher physical effects scores than LSD users. Common harm reduction practices included not microdosing when feeling unwell (31.0%), avoiding alcohol (30.8%) and caffeine (23.8%), and avoiding driving (20.3%). A quarter of participants reported regularly microdosing before important work or study events.
Discussion
The finding that mental health improvement was the primary motivation for most participants — with psilocybin users more likely than LSD users to report this motivation — reflects the broader cultural context of psychedelic research and suggests that many people are self-treating symptoms of depression, anxiety, and related disorders outside clinical frameworks. The diversity of perceived benefits across mood, social connection, and cognitive domains is consistent with anecdotal reports, though without placebo controls these effects cannot be attributed causally to the microdose. The authors highlight that most participants experienced unwanted effects at least occasionally, and that a notable minority regularly microdosed in high-stakes contexts (e.g., before work or study) or combined microdosing with cannabis. The absence of significant dependence scores is consistent with the known low-addiction-liability profile of classic psychedelics. The authors call for controlled longitudinal studies to establish efficacy, optimal dosing schedules, and the long-term safety of regular microdosing.
Conclusion
This international survey characterises the real-world microdosing landscape, finding that mental health and wellbeing improvement is the most commonly reported motivation, and that perceived benefits span mood, social connection, and cognitive performance domains. Whilst unwanted effects were reported by a majority of participants at some point, serious adverse outcomes were uncommon. The evidence base for microdosing remains limited, and controlled trials are needed to determine whether the benefits reported by self-selecting users are attributable to the pharmacological effects of sub-perceptual psychedelic doses.
View full paper sections
RESULTS
Data were analysed using Stata (v13.0) and statistical significance was set at p<0.05. We compared participants who were currently microdosing exclusively using LSD/1P-LSD with those exclusively using psilocybin using t-tests and chi-square tests for sociodemographic characteristics, psychedelic use history, microdosing motivations, dosing practices, perceived benefits, unwanted effects, and harm reduction practices. A proportion of respondents did not complete items on unwanted effects and harm reduction practices. We conducted a sensitivity analysis to compare the sociodemographic characteristics of respondents who completed these questions (n = 467) with those who did not (n = 58). No significant differences were detected. We conducted two principal component analyses using polychoric correlation matrices to determine whether items about (1) short-term benefits from microdosing and (2) unwanted effects of microdosing formed reliable scales. Polychoric methods are appropriate when conducting factor analyses with binary and ordinal scales. The minimum loading for inclusion on a factor was 0.4. If an item loaded on two factors, a difference of at least 0.2 between loadings was required to include the higher loading item. For scales generated from factors for short-term benefits, scale scores ranged from 0 (no items endorsed) to 1 (all items endorsed), and for unwanted effects, scale scores ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (always). We used multivariate linear regression to examine differences in mean scores on each scale between participants microdosing LSD/1P-LSD only and participants microdosing psilocybin only, and according to participants primary motivation for microdosing, controlling for potentially confounding variables (age, gender, education, employment, country of residence, taken standard psychedelic dose in past year). Regression results report standardised betas. Harm reduction practices were not examined via principal component analysis as several items were not applicable to all participants (e.g., avoiding antidepressants on microdosing days).
CONCLUSION
This study examined motivations, practices and subjective experiences of microdosing psychedelics in an international online sample. Almost all participants were microdosing psilocybin (55%) or LSD (48%), most had been microdosing for up to six months (65%), and a diverse range of motivations and dosing practices were reported. The most common motivation for microdosing was an alternative treatment for mental health (40%), either as a replacement or adjunct to conventional treatments, followed by personal development and general wellbeing (31%), and enhancement of cognitive function (18%). Most participants reported experiencing benefits on microdosing days, including improved mood and reduced anxiety, greater connection to other people and their environment, and enhanced cognitive performance. Some participants reported having experienced negative effects while microdosing, including psychedelic effects typically associated with regular doses, anxiety and physical symptoms, although few participants reported that these occurred regularly. Two in five participants reported that their primary reason for microdosing was as an alternative mental health therapy, most of whom perceived that microdosing reduced depression and anxiety symptoms, and improved their self-confidence and social connectedness. This supports the findings of other non-clinical studies that have described improved psychological wellbeing among people microdosing. However, most microdosing studies have excluded people with previous or current mental health diagnoses and have not reported microdosing motivations, a limitation that the present study addresses. These findings suggest that standard mental health treatments like antidepressants have not met the needs of many of our study participants, who were resorting to self-managed treatment with psychedelics. As most participants had previous experience of using psychedelics, it is possible that they were less apprehensive about psychedelic use and had better knowledge of where to access them compared to those without prior experience. A recent study of psychedelic users found that among those diagnosed with a mental health disorder, 62% had used psychedelics as an adjunct or replacement therapy to prescribed medication or psychotherapy. It is unsurprising that some people are turning to alternative mental health treatments like microdosing. Psychiatric medications have variable levels of effectiveness and adherence, and treatment engagement for mental disorders is often below 50%. Recent meta-analyses have found that differences in the effectiveness of antidepressants and placebo are small and unlikely to be clinical meaningful. Antidepressant side effects are common, and more than half report withdrawal on cessation (56%), which can last from weeks to months. Participants microdosing with psilocybin were more likely than participants microdosing with LSD to report that their primary motivation was as a treatment for depression and anxiety. It is unclear why this was found, but could be related to participants' knowledge of recent clinical trials, which are predominantly investigating psilocybinand have been reported in major newspapers. Additional research is required to better understand why people choose one psychedelic over another for different microdosing motivations, as well as more focused research with people who have microdosed more than one substance. Few participants reported microdosing to manage substance use cessation or reduction, which could reflect greater media attention on microdosing for cognitive enhancement and as alternative therapies for depression and anxiety, as well as the higher prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders than substance use disorders in the general population (and acknowledging the high comorbidity of substance use and mental disorders). Less than one in five participants had discussed microdosing with a health professional. While this may be less of a concern for people microdosing for cognitive enhancement, people microdosing as a treatment for mental health, and particularly those ceasing psychiatric medications to commence microdosing, should consider discussing microdosing with their prescribing physician and psychotherapist. These may be difficult conversations given the legal status of these substances, and individuals may be concerned about unsupportive or stigmatizing responses, degradation of the therapeutic relationship or fear of legal repercussions. Opting not to discuss changes in psychiatric medications is common; a recent UK survey found that only half of those who stopped antidepressants did so in consultation with their doctor. While popular media has often portrayed microdosing as a tool to improve focus, productivity and creativity, less than one in five participants reported cognitive enhancement as their primary motivation. We reported participants' primary motivation for microdosing, and it is possible that cognitive enhancement was a secondary motivation for some participants. Cognitive benefits while microdosing were not as commonly reported as improved mood, reduced anxiety and enhanced connectedness, but were still reported by more than 40% of the sample. Enhanced cognitive performance was more likely to be reported by participants microdosing with LSD than psilocybin, which may reflect psychopharmacological differences, and LSD may be more suited to focus and attention to a specific task than psilocybin. Microdosing psychedelics for cognitive enhancement may carry fewer risks than using other nootropics like psychostimulants. Most participants reported having experienced unwanted effects while microdosing, although few reported that this was a common occurrence. It is concerning that one in five participants reported having experienced paranoia while microdosing, and a more in-depth investigation is warranted. Very few participants reported regularly experiencing increased anxiety while microdosing, which does not support suggestions that people with anxiety consider avoiding microdosing. Although we found no relationship between dose and experiencing anxiety (which may be due to difficulty in reliably assessing dose size), people microdosing to reduce anxiety may do better at lower doses. Adverse physical effects were not commonly reported, consistent with evidence that there are few physical harms from psychedelics. Physical effects were more commonly reported by participants microdosing LSD than psilocybin, which could reflect psychopharmacological differences.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicssurvey
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics