Low dose oral ketamine treatment in chronic suicidality: An open-label pilot study
In an open‑label pilot (n = 32) of six weeks' low‑dose oral ketamine for chronic suicidality, mean Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation scores fell from above to below the clinical threshold, with 69% showing clinical improvement at week 6 and 50% maintaining significant improvement at 10‑week follow‑up. These results suggest oral ketamine is a feasible, tolerable alternative to IV ketamine for reducing suicidal ideation.
Authors
- Beaudequin, D. A.
- Can, A. T.
- Dutton, M.
Published
Abstract
AbstractRecently, low-dose ketamine has been proposed as a rapid-acting treatment option for suicidality. The majority of studies to date have utilised intravenous (IV) ketamine, however, this route of administration has limitations. On the other hand, oral ketamine can be administered in a range of settings, which is important in treating suicidality, although studies as to safety and feasibility are lacking. n = 32 adults (aged 22–72 years; 53% female) with chronic suicidal thoughts participated in the Oral Ketamine Trial on Suicidality (OKTOS), an open-label trial of sub-anaesthetic doses of oral ketamine over 6 weeks. Participants commenced with 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine, which was titrated to a maximum 3.0 mg/kg. Follow-up assessments occurred at 4 weeks after the final dose. The primary outcome measure was the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) and secondary measures included scales for suicidality and depressive symptoms, and measures of functioning and well-being. Mean BSS scores significantly reduced from a high level of suicidal ideation at the pre-ketamine (week 0) timepoint to below the clinical threshold at the post-ketamine (week 6) timepoint. The proportion of participants that achieved clinical improvement within the first 6 weeks was 69%, whereas 50% achieved a significant improvement by the follow-up (week 10) timepoint. Six weeks of oral ketamine treatment in participants with chronic suicidality led to significant reduction in suicidal ideation. The response observed in this study is consistent with IV ketamine trials, suggesting that oral administration is a feasible and tolerable alternative treatment for chronic suicidality.
Research Summary of 'Low dose oral ketamine treatment in chronic suicidality: An open-label pilot study'
Introduction
Suicide remains a major global public health problem despite an overall decline in rates, and most suicides are associated with psychiatric disorders—particularly mood disorders. Conventional antidepressant treatments can take weeks to exert benefit, do not directly target glutamate or GABA neurotransmission, and leave a substantial proportion of patients with persistent symptoms; around 30% of people with depression meet criteria for treatment-resistant depression after failing two or more antidepressant trials. Ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, produces rapid glutamatergic effects that upregulate neurotrophic signalling and synaptic connectivity and has shown fast-acting reductions in depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation in trials that have mainly used the intravenous (IV) route. IV administration, however, is resource intensive and not readily scalable to many clinical settings, prompting interest in oral ketamine as a more accessible alternative, although evidence about its safety, dosing and feasibility in people with chronic suicidal ideation is limited. Can and colleagues therefore designed an open-label, flexible-dose pilot trial to assess whether once-weekly oral ketamine over 6 weeks, with a 4-week no-ketamine follow-up, is feasible, safe and tolerable and whether it reduces suicidality in adults with chronic suicidal thoughts. The primary objective was change in suicidal ideation measured by the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS), with secondary assessments of suicidal attributes, depressive symptoms, functioning and well-being. The authors hypothesised that oral ketamine would produce a significant reduction in suicidality from baseline to the post-treatment visit.
Methods
This was an open-label, single-arm pilot trial conducted at the Thompson Institute between August 2018 and November 2019. Adults (≥18 years) presenting with chronic suicidality were recruited via referrals from local general practitioners, psychiatrists and advertising; chronic suicidality was operationally defined as suicidal ideation occurring continuously or intermittently over months to years and was confirmed by the principal investigator and a consultant psychiatrist. Inclusion required a BSS score of ≥6 at screening. Key exclusions included a history of psychosis or mania/hypomania, acute suicidality requiring urgent intervention, significant uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or other specified medical contraindications, abnormal liver function, pregnancy or breastfeeding. Participants remained on their usual psychotropic medications during the trial. The intervention comprised six once-weekly oral doses of racemic ketamine, administered as a liquid in fruit juice under clinical supervision. The initial dose was 0.5 mg/kg and doses were adjusted at each visit by +0.2 to +0.5 mg/kg or −0.2 to −0.7 mg/kg according to tolerability, with a maximum permitted dose of 3.0 mg/kg at the sixth treatment. Participants were observed for at least 90 minutes after dosing, advised not to undertake activities requiring alertness for 12 hours, and had twice-weekly phone safety checks between treatments. Baseline assessments within 14 days prior to treatment included physical examination, laboratory tests, urinalysis and standardised rating scales; MRI and EEG were performed but those data are not reported in this paper. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed using validated instruments. The primary outcome was change in BSS across three timepoints: pre-ketamine (baseline), post-ketamine (one to seven days after the final dose; week 6) and follow-up (28–32 days after the final dose; week 10). A response on the BSS was defined as either ≥50% improvement from baseline to post-ketamine or a post-ketamine BSS score ≤6; a prolonged response applied the same criteria at follow-up. Secondary measures (pre-ketamine to follow-up) included the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) and the WHO-5 wellbeing index, with prolonged antidepressant response defined as ≥50% improvement in MADRS. Safety and tolerability measures completed 60 minutes post-dose included the Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE), FIBSER, Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS); vital signs and urine/blood monitoring were performed at prespecified timepoints. For inferential analyses the investigators used repeated measures ANOVA for the primary outcome across three timepoints with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons and reported Cohen's d effect sizes. Secondary outcomes were analysed with repeated measures ANOVAs across two timepoints (pre-ketamine and follow-up). Analyses were conducted in SPSS version 24.0 with significance set at p = 0.05.
Results
Of 64 people screened, 40 met inclusion criteria; five were withdrawn for clinical concerns and three declined to continue, leaving 32 participants who received the six-week treatment. Thirty participants completed the follow-up assessment (two were lost to follow-up). The sample comprised 17 females and 15 males with mean age 45.7 ± 14.2 years and mean weight 91.1 ± 24.8 kg at first treatment. All participants met DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD); MDD was the primary diagnosis for 28 participants, while smaller numbers had primary OCD, PTSD or GAD with comorbid MDD. Two-thirds of the sample were unemployed or not in the labour force. Primary outcome: Mean BSS scores fell markedly from a pre-ketamine mean of 20.0 ± 4.7 (n = 32; range 12–30) to 5.6 ± 7.6 at post-ketamine (n = 32; range 0–22) and were 9.1 ± 8.2 at follow-up (n = 30; range 0–25). A repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant main effect of time (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons indicated large effects for pre-ketamine versus post-ketamine (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.04) and pre-ketamine versus follow-up (p < 0.001; d = 1.54). There was a statistically significant increase in BSS from post-ketamine to follow-up (p < 0.05; d = −0.42), though the mean follow-up score remained at less than 50% of the pre-ketamine mean. Using the predefined responder criteria, 69% of participants were BSS responders at week 6 and 50% met prolonged responder criteria at week 10. The categorical criterion of BSS ≤6 was met by 95% at post-ketamine (all of whom also met the ≥50% improvement criterion) and by 80% at follow-up. Thirteen participants were responders at both post-ketamine and follow-up. Secondary outcomes: All secondary measures showed statistically significant improvement from pre-ketamine to follow-up. SIDAS mean scores decreased from 26.7 to 17.2 (p < 0.001), shifting the group mean from a ‘high’ to a ‘low’ suicidal ideation category. MADRS scores fell from 38.6 (severe depression range) to 15.9 (mild), SOFAS clinician-rated functioning improved from 57.3 to 69.3, and WHO-5 wellbeing increased from 17.6% to 33.6% though remained below the 50% threshold for ‘good’ wellbeing. Sixty-three per cent of participants were prolonged antidepressant responders by MADRS criteria; of these, 13 were also prolonged BSS responders while six were MADRS responders without prolonged BSS response. Safety and tolerability: No serious adverse events were reported. Vital sign changes were transient; mean systolic blood pressure rose by 3.6 mmHg and mean diastolic blood pressure by 4.7 mmHg from pre-ketamine to 30 minutes post-dose. No significant changes in heart rate, respiratory rate or oxygen saturation were observed. The most frequent side effects across the six weeks were decreased energy and fatigue, anxiety, poor concentration, restlessness, general malaise, dry mouth, dizziness and tremor. Symptom frequency and reported distress were greatest in week 1 and generally declined across weeks 2–6, with distressing fatigue reported by about 22% at week 6 and other symptoms at <10% by week 6. Approximately 94% of participants (30/32) rated overall symptom intensity as mild, and 31/32 rated overall burden as mild. Dissociative symptoms measured by CADSS did not exceed a rating of 2 (moderate) across the trial; a small number of participants endorsed particular CADSS items at moderate level on no more than one or two occasions. No BPRS positive-symptom item exceeded mild (rating 3) and no YMRS total score exceeded 6 (well below the threshold for mania). No participants withdrew because of ketamine side effects.
Discussion
Can and colleagues interpret their findings as supporting the feasibility, safety and tolerability of once-weekly, low-dose oral ketamine for people with chronic suicidal ideation. They report a very large reduction in suicidal ideation at the group level from baseline to post-treatment, with a substantial effect size (Cohen's d > 2.0) that remained large at four-week follow-up (d > 1.5) despite a modest rebound in scores after treatment cessation. Secondary measures of suicidal attributes, depressive symptoms, functioning and wellbeing shifted in the same direction, with MADRS moving into the mild range and SIDAS into a low-risk category at follow-up; improvements in functioning and wellbeing were smaller and the group mean wellbeing score remained in the ‘poor’ range. The investigators note that response rates (69% antisuicidal response at week 6; 50% prolonged antisuicidal response at week 10) are broadly consistent with those reported in IV ketamine studies, suggesting oral administration could be a viable alternative when administered under supervision. They highlight that their dosing strategy was conservative—once-weekly administration with a maximum of 3.0 mg/kg—contrasting with some earlier oral protocols that used higher doses or more frequent dosing. Tolerability was acceptable in this sample, with mainly transient, mild adverse effects and no serious adverse events. Key limitations are acknowledged by the authors: the open-label, uncontrolled design introduces the possibility that non-specific factors including expectancy and frequent clinical contact contributed to observed improvements; concurrent psychopharmacological treatments were permitted, so the independent contribution of ketamine cannot be isolated; and the trial did not prospectively define a minimum duration for ‘chronic’ suicidality (although all participants had ideation for at least six months). The sample size was small and the authors caution that efficacy cannot be definitively established without randomised controlled trials. They recommend larger, randomised studies to examine whether ketamine's antisuicidal effects are separable from its antidepressant effects and to evaluate impacts on suicidal behaviour and attempts.
View full paper sections
RESULTS
The primary outcome measure for the study was a reduction in suicidality with ketamine treatment, as determined by the BSS. A 'response' was defined by: (i) ⩾50% improvement in BSS score from the pre-ketamine to the post-ketamine visit; or (ii) BSS score ⩽6 at the postketamine visit. A 'prolonged response' was defined by: (i) ⩾50% improvement in BSS score from pre-ketamine to the follow-up visit; or (ii) BSS score ⩽6 at the follow-up visit. Secondary outcome measures included preketamine to follow-up changes in SIDAS, MADRS, WHO-5 and SOFAS scores. Furthermore, 'prolonged antidepressant response' was defined by ⩾50% improvement in the MADRS score from pre-ketamine to the follow-up visit.
CONCLUSION
To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to explore the feasibility, safety and tolerability of oral ketamine on chronic suicidality in patients who presented with a range of psychiatric conditions including mood, anxiety, and personality disorders. In this pilot study, 6 weeks of oral ketamine treatment for chronic suicidality led to a significant decrease in the primary outcome measure (BSS) from pre-ketamine to post-ketamine and from pre-ketamine to a follow-up period during which ketamine had ceased for 4 weeks following the postketamine timepoint. A slight increase in BSS scores was observed between the post-ketamine and follow-up timepoints; however, the sample mean score at followup was still representative of a >50% improvement in BSS from the pre-ketamine level. In terms of clinical significance, the effect size for change in BSS score from preketamine to post-ketamine timepoints was very large (Cohen's d > 2.0) and remained very large (d > 1.5) at follow-up (i.e. despite the increase in BSS score from postketamine to follow-up). The other suicidality and depression scales reflected the same overall pattern, for both self-reported and clinician-rated scales. On closer inspection, these scales revealed some important details. The clinician-rated measure for depressive symptoms (MADRS) was in the 'mild' range at follow-up. Furthermore, for the self-reported measure of suicidal ideation (i.e. the SIDAS) the mean score was in the low risk category. In terms of the functional and well-being measures (i.e. SOFAS and WHO-5), the improvements (at follow-up) were incremental, which may be due to the relatively brief period of time (10 weeks) for these constructs to change substantially. Overall, oral ketamine led to significant short-term and prolonged improvements in suicidal ideation, affective symptoms, well-being and sociooccupational functioning in this sample of adults with a history of chronic suicidality and MDD. Furthermore, this trial demonstrated feasibility, beyond the clinically significant reduction in suicidality and overall tolerability, by exceeding the target enrolment (of n = 25) within the funded period of 24 months (as per the trial registry). There were some important findings in terms of the proportions of participants that responded to oral ketamine treatment. More than two-thirds (69%) of participants had an antisuicidal response (i.e. at week 6), and half (50%) showed a prolonged antisuicidal response (week 10). These response levels are consistent with those seen in trials using IV ketamine, suggesting that oral ketamine is a viable form of treatment for chronic suicidality. Interestingly, a similar proportion of individuals (63%) were (prolonged) antidepressant responders, however a third of these were not categorised as prolonged antisuicidal responders (i.e. n = 6 individuals had ⩾50% improvement in the MADRS but not in BSS at follow-up), suggesting there may be individual differences in the way suicidal versus broader depressive symptoms may be improved by oral ketamine. This is consistent with findings that the reduction of suicidal ideation after ketamine treatment is variable in terms of the extent and duration. Furthermore, the differences observed in responder-type are also consistent with the notion that ketamine's effects on suicidality may be partially independent of its effects on other depressive symptoms. A distinct and contemporary feature of this study was that the treatment protocol also assessed specific dosing, titration method, and interval timeframes of oral ketamine. Our approach was conservative in terms of the maximum as well as the frequency of dose. The maximum oral ketamine dosage was capped at 3 mg/kg which is in contrast to previous studies that have reported dosages of up to 7 mg/kg. Moreover, in direct contrast to our study where oral ketamine was administered once per week, previous studies have reported more frequent doses. Utilising such a conservative approach, we found that oral ketamine was relatively well tolerated as reflected by the fact that it was associated with only temporary side effects such as altered sensorium, dissociative experiences, sedation, dizziness and nausea immediately after the treatment. Notably, all of these side effects resolved by the time all participants were discharged. Despite this, based on current knowledge, oral ketamine should be taken under medical supervision until dosing and associated tolerability are well established in future studies. The current study has several limitations that require mention. Firstly, it was an open-label study with no placebo or control group. Furthermore, given the design (that included 20 contact points) it is important to consider the possibility that these findings may in part be due to other factors such as non-specific psychological and/or expectancy effects. Thus, future studies of oral ketamine in chronic suicidality utilising randomised controlled designs are needed. Additionally, ketamine was administered as an augmentation therapy, meaning that participants were allowed to remain on their usual treatment. Therefore, we are not able to disentangle the contribution of the participant's ongoing medications when reporting on participant improvement in well-being. In this respect it is difficult to exclude any combined and/or synergic effects between ketamine and other psychopharmacological agents or psychological interventions. Another limitation was that we did not specify a minimum duration for 'chronic suicidality', however, all participants in this trial experienced suicidality for at least 6 months. Future studies may address this by determining an a priori definition that specifies the duration of suicidality. This study sought to explore the feasibility, safety and tolerability of oral ketamine treatment in adults with chronic suicidality. While any determination of efficacy is limited by a lack of a control arm (and randomisation), the overall findings, given the inclusion criteria, flexible dosing (and mode of delivery) and acceptance of concurrent psychopharmacological agents suggest an overall feasibility and tolerability of oral ketamine in this population thereby providing a foundation for subsequent efficacy and comparative effectiveness trials. The present study has added further evidence to the rapidly increasing ketamine literature regarding the feasibility of glutamatergic based antisuicidal agents. It highlights the importance of the glutamatergic system in treating suicidality (and depression) in contrast to current antidepressants, which primarily targets monoaminergic neurotransmitters. Larger randomised control studies are needed to examine whether the antisuicidal effect of ketamine can be separated from its antidepressant effects. Also, further studies are needed to explore the impact of ketamine on suicidal behaviour and suicidal attempts.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsopen labeldose finding
- Journal
- Compound
- Topics