Long-lasting subjective effects of LSD in normal subjects
This double-blind cross-over trial (n=16) found that LSD (200μg) led to positive well-being/life-satisfaction scores up to 12 months later. The subjects experienced it as one of the top 10 most meaningful experiences (70%) in their lives.
Abstract
Rationale: Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and other serotonergic hallucinogens can induce profound alterations of consciousness and mystical-type experiences, with reportedly long-lasting effects on subjective well-being and personality.Methods: We investigated the lasting effects of a single dose of LSD (200 μg) that was administered in a laboratory setting in 16 healthy participants. The following outcome measures were assessed before and 1 and 12 months after LSD administration: Persisting Effects Questionnaire (PEQ), Mysticism Scale (MS), Death Transcendence Scale (DTS), NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).Results: On the PEQ, positive attitudes about life and/or self, positive mood changes, altruistic/positive social effects, positive behavioral changes, and well-being/life satisfaction significantly increased at 1 and 12 months and were subjectively attributed by the subjects to the LSD experience. Five-Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness (5D-ASC) total scores, reflecting acutely induced alterations in consciousness, and Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ30) total scores correlated with changes in well-being/life satisfaction 12 months after LSD administration. No changes in negative attitudes, negative mood, antisocial/negative social effects, or negative behavior were attributed to the LSD experience. After 12 months, 10 of 14 participants rated their LSD experience as among the top 10 most meaningful experiences in their lives. Five participants rated the LSD experience among the five most spiritually meaningful experiences in their lives. On the MS and DTS, ratings of mystical experiences significantly increased 1 and 12 months after LSD administration compared with the pre-LSD screening. No relevant changes in personality measures were found.Conclusions: In healthy research subjects, the administration of a single dose of LSD (200 μg) in a safe setting was subjectively considered a personally meaningful experience that had long-lasting subjective positive effects.
Research Summary of 'Long-lasting subjective effects of LSD in normal subjects'
Introduction
Classic serotonergic hallucinogens such as LSD act primarily at 5-HT2A receptors and have been reported to produce profound acute alterations of consciousness and, in some reports, enduring positive changes in attitudes, mood, values and well-being. Earlier human research, including older studies of LSD and more recent work with psilocybin, has described persisting subjective benefits and increases in lifetime mystical-type experiences after single high-dose sessions. However, contemporary experimental data on long-term effects following administratively controlled LSD in psychiatrically healthy volunteers remain scarce, particularly using instruments comparable to those applied in recent psilocybin trials. Schmid and colleagues therefore designed a study to characterise persisting subjective effects after a single oral dose of LSD (200 μg) in healthy participants. The a priori hypotheses were that participants would attribute personally meaningful and spiritually significant effects to the LSD experience up to 12 months later, that mystical-experience scales would increase at 1 and 12 months versus pre-LSD screening, that acute alterations of consciousness would correlate with longer-term changes, and that trait openness might increase as has been reported in some prior hallucinogen studies.
Methods
The study used a randomised, double-blind, balanced cross-over design with two 25-hour experimental sessions (LSD 200 μg p.o. and placebo), separated by at least a 7-day washout. Ethical and regulatory approvals were obtained in Switzerland, participants provided written consent, and the trial was registered. Although the crossover compared acute LSD and placebo effects, the present report focuses on safety and persisting effects after the single LSD session with follow-up assessments at approximately 1 month (mean 37 ± 14 days) and at least 12 months (mean 491 ± 199 days) post-LSD. Sixteen healthy adults (eight men, eight women; mean age 28.6 ± 6.2 years) were recruited; most were well educated and screened for psychiatric, medical and recent substance-use exclusions. Seven participants reported one to three prior hallucinogen uses and nine were hallucinogen-naive. During each test session participants were supervised continuously for up to 16 hours after dosing and remained in a calm hospital research ward environment overnight. LSD (200 μg; Lipomed AG) was administered in gelatin capsules. Outcome measures mirrored those used in contemporary psilocybin work: the Persisting Effects Questionnaire (PEQ), Mysticism Scale (MS; lifetime version), Death Transcendence Scale (DTS), NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) for personality traits, and the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for trait anxiety. Acute measures included the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ) and the Five Dimensions of Altered States of Consciousness (5D-ASC), administered 24 hours after dosing to capture retrospective peak effects. Because some instruments were not available in validated German versions, the study team forward- and back-translated and pretested translations; the authors note these versions were not formally validated. Statistical analyses used paired t tests for acute MS comparisons between LSD and placebo, repeated-measures ANOVA (screening, 1 month, 12 months) with Tukey post hoc tests for longitudinal measures, and one-sample t tests to compare PEQ domain scores to a no-change value of zero. Sex was assessed as a between-subjects factor where relevant. Associations between acute responses and 12-month outcomes used Spearman rank correlations. The significance threshold was P < 0.05 and the authors report results without correction for multiple comparisons because many hypotheses were a priori. Some attrition occurred: one subject was lost to follow-up at 12 months and several participants did not complete all items on some questionnaires, yielding 14 complete datasets for many key outcomes and 15 for some personality measures.
Results
Acute effects: Compared with placebo, LSD produced robust acute increases on the Mysticism Scale (MS). Mean MS total scores 24 hours after dosing were 194 ± 14 for LSD versus 45 ± 9 for placebo (t13 = 8.9, P < 0.001). All three MS factors (interpretation, introvertive mysticism and extrovertive mysticism) were significantly higher after LSD than placebo (for example, interpretation 72 ± 6 vs 17 ± 3, t13 = 7.6, P < 0.001; introvertive 55 ± 3 vs 12 ± 2, t13 = 13.2, P < 0.001). The authors also report significant acute increases in 5D-ASC total and MEQ30 scores after LSD (details summarised in a table not fully reproduced in the extracted text). Persisting subjective effects (PEQ): On the Persisting Effects Questionnaire, ratings of positive attitudes about life/self, positive mood changes, altruistic/positive social effects and positive behavioural changes were significantly greater than zero at both 1 and 12 months, indicating participant-attributed positive changes. Conversely, ratings of negative attitudes, negative mood, antisocial/negative social effects and negative behavioural changes were not different from zero at either follow-up. Ratings of personal meaningfulness and spiritual significance increased at 1 and 12 months compared with minimal reference values: at 12 months 10 of 14 participants rated the LSD experience among the top 10 most meaningful experiences of their lives (rating ≥ 6), and among these 10 participants five rated it among the top five (rating = 7). Spiritual-significance ratings at 12 months showed that eight of 14 participants rated the experience as very strongly spiritual (rating ≥ 4), five of these rated it among the five most spiritually meaningful experiences (rating ≥ 5), and one participant rated it as the single most spiritually significant experience (rating = 6). Ratings of well-being or life satisfaction increased at both follow-ups compared with no change; no participant reported decreased well-being attributed to the LSD session. Mysticism Scale (lifetime) and Death Transcendence: The MS lifetime total score and the introvertive and extrovertive factors were significantly increased at 1 and 12 months relative to pre-LSD screening. The Death Transcendence Scale (DTS) total score and its mysticism subscale were also significantly higher at 1 and 12 months; mysticism subscale ratings further increased from 1 to 12 months. No sex differences were observed for these longitudinal measures. Personality and anxiety measures: No relevant changes in personality traits (NEO-FFI) were detected at 1 or 12 months; the study did not replicate an increase in trait openness. Trait anxiety on the STAI remained unchanged across time. Correlations: Greater acute alterations of consciousness, reflected by the 5D-ASC total score, were positively associated with several 12-month outcomes attributed to LSD: PEQ positive mood (Rs = 0.56, P < 0.05), PEQ behaviour (Rs = 0.53, P < 0.05), PEQ well-being/life satisfaction (Rs = 0.53, P < 0.05), MS total score (Rs = 0.62, P < 0.05) and DTS total score (Rs = 0.76, P < 0.01). Acute mystical-type measures also predicted long-term outcomes: MEQ30 total correlated with PEQ well-being/life satisfaction at 12 months (Rs = 0.60, P < 0.05), and MS total and MEQ30 total correlated with DTS changes (Rs = 0.66, P < 0.01 and Rs = 0.65, P < 0.05, respectively). Adverse events: Transient adverse effects were minimal. At 1 month one subject reported a 10-day period of increased vivid dreams and difficulty falling asleep; no participants reported psychological problems or perceptual disorders such as flashbacks up to 1 month, and there were no spontaneous reports of adverse effects at 12 months.
Discussion
Schmid and colleagues interpret their findings as evidence that a single high oral dose of LSD (200 μg) administered in a controlled hospital setting can produce an experience that participants subsequently regard as personally meaningful and associated with enduring positive changes in attitudes, mood, social behaviour and well-being up to 12 months later. The investigators note that the magnitude of acute alterations of consciousness, particularly the 5D-ASC total score, and measures of acute mystical-type experiences predicted greater long-term positive changes, consistent with prior work linking acute phenomenology to persisting outcomes. The authors position these results alongside earlier LSD reports and a larger body of contemporary psilocybin research. They observe similarities with psilocybin studies showing lasting positive subjective effects and increases in lifetime mysticism scores, but they also note differences: in this study LSD did not alter personality trait measures such as openness, whereas some prior reports have described transient openness changes after different dosing regimens. The investigators highlight that the 5D-ASC, reflecting overall mind-altering effects, was a stronger predictor of long-term subjective changes in their sample than more specific mystical-type scales, suggesting that broad alterations of consciousness may be an important mechanistic correlate of persisting benefits. Schmid and colleagues discuss the likely importance of set and setting and preparatory support in determining the frequency and intensity of mystical-type experiences and downstream effects. They compare their hospital-based protocol and participant sample (mostly students, paid, not selected for spiritual practice) with studies by other groups in which participants were spiritually active, received substantial preparatory contact and group support, and reported higher absolute MEQ scores and higher rates of complete mystical experiences. The authors caution that some high MEQ scores reported in other studies may partly reflect setting and preparatory interventions rather than drug effects alone. Several limitations are acknowledged. First, there was no parallel control group to evaluate longer-term effects, so attribution of persisting changes specifically to LSD cannot be definitively established and expectation bias cannot be excluded. Second, the sample size was small and underpowered to detect small personality effects. Third, many questionnaires were translated into German but not formally validated in translation. Fourth, the study population consisted of healthy volunteers studied under stringent safety precautions, limiting generalisability to other populations or settings where adverse acute or long-term responses could be more likely. The authors conclude that, in their sample, a single LSD session produced lasting, subjectively positive and spiritually meaningful effects without relevant long-term adverse outcomes or changes in personality trait measures.
View full paper sections
RESULTS
The present LSD study used the same acute and long-term outcome measures as the previous psilocybin studies, including the PEQ, MS, DTS, and similar and additional personality measures. The PEQ, MS, and DTS were unavailable in validated German versions. Therefore, the original English questionnaireswere independently forward-translated into German by two translators with German as their mother tongue. Discrepancies between the two forward-translated versions and other previous German versions were then discussed, and selected items were backtranslated. The versions were then pretested for comprehension by people with prior LSD use. The non-validated German versions that were finally used in the study are available online (Supplementary Appendices 1-3). Persisting Effects Questionnaire The 143-item PEQ is a non-validated questionnaire that has previously been used to study long-term effects of psilocybin. A non-validated German version was used (Supplementary Appendix 1). A total of 140 items are rated on six-point Likert scales to assess possible changes in positive or negative attitudes about life and/or self (17 items each), positive and negative mood changes (4 items each), altruistic/positive and antisocial/negative social effects (8 items each), and positive and negative behavioral changes (1 item each;. All ratings reflect persisting changes that are subjectively related to the LSD experience, and no change would be reflected by a score of 0. Three additional questions were included as previously described: (1) How personally meaningful was the experience? (1 = no more than routine, everyday experiences; 2 = similar to meaningful experiences that occur on average once or more per week; 3 = similar to meaningful experiences that occur on average once per month; 4 = similar to meaningful experiences that occur on average once per year; 5 = similar to meaningful experiences that occur on average once every 5 years; 6 = among the 10 most meaningful experiences of my life; 7 = among the 5 most meaningful experiences of my life; 8 = the single most meaningful experience of my life); (2) indicate the degree to which the experience was spiritually significant for you (1 = not at all; 2 = slightly; 3 = moderately; 4 = very much; 5 = among the 5 most spiritually significant experiences of my life; 6 = the single most spiritually significant experience of my life); and (3) do you believe that the experience and your contemplation of the experience have led to a change in your current sense of personal well-being or life satisfaction? (+ 3 = increased very much to -3 = decreased very much; 0 indicates no change;. The questionnaires were completed 1 and 12 months after LSD administration. One subject was lost to follow-up at 12 months, one subject did not complete all of the questions at 1 and 12 months, and one subject did not complete all of the questions at 1 month, thus resulting in data from 14 subjects at both time points.
CONCLUSION
The main findings of the present study were that the administration of a single dose of LSD (200 μg p.o.) in healthy volunteers induced a subjectively meaningful experience with lasting positive effects that were attributed to the LSD experience by the participants. Greater ratings of acute LSDinduced alterations of mind on the 5D-ASC and/or mysticaltype experiences on the MEQ30 scales were associated with greater ratings of well-being 12 months after the experience and changes in lifetime mystical experiences. LSD did not increase trait openness or produce relevant changes in personality measures. In the present study, LSD was not associated with lasting negative effects, as no lasting increases of negative attitudes, negative mood, and negative behavior could be observed after one and 12 months. The present findings confirmed most of our hypotheses and complemented similar recent reports of lasting effects of psilocybin in healthy subjects using the same outcome measures. The lasting effects of LSD were also reported in psychiatrically healthy subjects in older studies). Short-term effects on personality measures were reported in one recent study. Specifically, in the older study by, psychological tests were administered before and 2 weeks and 6 months after three single dose sessions (200 μg LSD p.o. in each session) in 24 healthy subjects to explore potential changes in attitudes and values. The participants were graduate students, were paid for participation, were LSD-naive, and received the drug in a secure setting but without suggestions of possible lasting effects. In contrast to our study, the drug sessions were held in a Btastefully decorated room specifically designed to enhance the drug experience^without distractions by experiments. A higher proportion of participants reported lasting effects on personality and greater appreciation of music and art. The majority of the participants also rated the acute LSD response as a very dramatic and interesting experience. However, the pre-LSD vs. post-LSD comparison of a series of personality and creativity test ratings did not document relevant changes. These previous findings of LSD-attributed subjective changes in attitudes, values, and esthetic interests in the absence of alterations in more objective test measureswere largely confirmed by the present results. More recently, Griffiths and colleagues administered a single dose of psilocybin in a supportive setting in 30 hallucinogen-naive and spiritually active healthy subjects to evaluate the long-term effects of psilocybin. A cross-over study design was used, including a control condition (methylphenidate, 40 mg/70 kg p.o.), to assess the acute effects of psilocybin (30 mg/70 kg p.o.). The MS and MEQ were used to assess acute mystical-type experiences, similar to the present study. Lasting effects of psilocybin were assessed at 2 and 14 months using the PEQ and MS. In contrast to the present study with LSD, the volunteers did not receive monetary compensation for participation. The investigators met with the participants on four occasions (for a total of 8 h) before the psilocybin session to prepare them for the experience. In contrast to the present study, this presession preparation explicitly included the monitor's expectation that the psilocybin session could increase personal awareness and insight) and thus could have lasting positive effects. Additionally, all of the subjects participated at least intermittently in religious or spiritual activities, in which 56% of the volunteers reporting daily engagement, and 39% indicated at least monthly activities. Griffiths and colleagues also conducted a dose-effect study that included the administration of four different single doses of psilocybin and placebo in 18 participants and assessed lasting effects at 1 and 14 months using the PEQ, MS, DTS, and NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI), similar to the present study. Similar to LSD in the present study, a single dose of psilocybin (30 mg/70 kg) significantly increased ratings of acute mystical-type experiences on the MS and MEQ. However, 17 of the overall 54 participants also reported strong or extreme fear sometimes during the session after administration of psilocybin at this dose. Consistent with the present findings, psilocybin also produced significant positive effects but no negative effects on the PE compared with the control condition, which lasted up to 1, 2, and 14 months after the sessions. Total scores on the MS lifetime version increased 2 months after a single dose of psilocybinand at the 14-month follow-up, similar to the present findings, in which MS scores increased 1 and 12 months after LSD administration. In the present study, we also observed a lasting increase in scores on the DTS Mysticism subscale, indicating an increase in mystical experiences, which is consistent with increases in lifetime mystical experiences on the MS, but no effects on the other subscale. In contrast, psilocybin only slightly changed scores on the DTS, with a slight increase on the religious subscale but not mysticism subscale at 14 months compared with pre-psilocybin screening. Overall, the present study found no lasting effects of LSD on various personality trait measures 1 or 12 months after LSD administration. We did not confirm our study hypothesis that LSD would increase trait openness on the NEO-FFI. In contrast to the lack of long-term effects of LSD on personality in the present study, NEO-PI Openness scores increased 2 weeks after administration of a lower dose of LSD (75 μg i.v.) in healthy subjects with mostly significant prior LSD use). These mid-term personality changes were likely transient. Consistent with the present LSD follow-up results, psilocybin did not alter personality trait ratings 2 or 14 months after a single dose of psilocybin compared with pre-psilocybin screening. Although increases in openness were noted 14 months after psilocybin administration in a pooled analysis of both studies, another more recent study by the same group again found no effects of psilocybin on NEO-PI personality measures 6 months after psilocybin administration. Trait anxiety ratings on the STAI were unchanged after LSD administration compared with pre-LSD screening in the present study. In contrast, LSD reduced trait anxiety ratings in patients with anxiety that was associated with life-threatening diseases. Altogether, the findings of controlled clinical studies, including the present study, are consistent with the view that serotonergic hallucinogens mainly produce lasting increases in lifetime mystical experiences and enduring positive effects on attitudes, mood, and behavior that are subjectively attributed to the hallucinogen experience. In contrast, the subjectively perceived changes did not result in relevant long-lasting changes in personality trait measures in healthy subjects. The use of LSD and psilocybin has been associated with mystical experiences. Mystical experiences that are induced by the hallucinogen psilocybin have been shown to be associated with long-term positive effects in healthy subjects) and therapeutic outcomes in patients). An interesting line of investigation is to explore the factors that contribute to these mystical experiences and whether they specifically predict the long-term effects of hallucinogens. Mystical-type experiences predicted positive therapeutic outcomes in patients even after controlling for subjective intensity of the drug effect. Similar to previous studies with psilocybin in healthy subjects, the present study found that the long-term effects of LSD were associated with the extent of the acute response to LSD. However, the overall alterations of mind, reflected by 5D-ASC scores, better predicted the long-term effects of LSD compared with assessments of the more specific acute mystical-type experience, such as MS acute total scores or MEQ30 scores. Thus, the present findings indicate that the overall alterations in consciousness that are acutely induced by LSD may contribute to LSD's lasting positive effects in normal subjects and in patients. The extent of acute hallucinogen-induced mystical-type experiences has been shown to be mainly dose-dependent. Higher rates of meditation/spiritual practice or greater support for spiritual practice also increased ratings of acute mystical-type effects and contributed to the positive long-term effects compared with a group that received psilocybin but less spiritual support. In this study, spiritual practice suggestions to all participants included 10-30 min of daily meditation, awareness practice, journaling, and other activities personally judged to facilitate spiritual growth). However, high support for spiritual practice included dialog group sessions to discuss implementing and sustaining spiritual practices of meditation and spiritual awareness and a total of 35 h of guide-participant contact from study start to the 6-month follow-up compared with no group sessions and only 7 h of contact in the group with less spiritual support. Absolute ratings of the acute mystical-type effects of the hallucinogen on the MS and MEQ were generally higher in the studies by Griffiths and colleaguescompared with the present study). Importantly, this was the case in both the hallucinogen and control conditions, whereas the acute hallucinogen-induced increases in MS and MEQ scores relative to the control condition were greater after LSD than psilocybin administration). In the present study, LSD produced mean MEQ30 ratings of 61% and a complete mystical experience in only two subjects (12.5%;. In contrast, psilocybin produced mean MEQ30 score ratings of 77% and a complete mystical experience in 67% of the subjects. However, placebo or active placebo (i.e., methylphenidate) also produced MEQ30 mean ratings of 23 and 33%, respectively, in these studies, indicating relevant differences between the studies, including research subjects characteristics (set) and setting. In contrast to the studies by Griffiths and colleagues, the participants in the present study were mostly university students. They received monetary compensation for participation and were not required to be spiritually active. The participants in the present study had a personal or scientific interest in experiencing the mind-altering effects of the hallucinogen in a safe hospital environment, but no explicit expectations or suggestions of mystical or lasting effects were conveyed by the research team. Thus, these differences in the study populations (spiritually active vs. not explicitly active), preparation (suggestion of mystical/lasting effects vs. no suggestions), and setting (esthetic living roomlike environment designed specifically for the study vs. hospital ward) likely accounted for the overall lower ratings of mystical-type effects in the present study compared with the studies by Griffiths and colleagues. We also observed no cases of relevant mystical-type effects after placebo administration, whereas approximately 5% of the subjects in the studies by Griffiths and colleagues experienced a marked or total mystical experience after placebo. Thus, the settings of the studies by Griffiths and colleagues appeared to be highly optimized to foster the emergence of mystical experiences, whereas fewer mystical-type experiences were reported in studies that were conducted by other groups. Notably, the effects of LSD (200 μg) in the present study and psilocybin (30 mg/70 kg) on 5D-ASC scores were comparable, indicating similar alterations in consciousness despite the different settings and acute mystical experiences. Remaining to be tested are what the high acute mystical experiences and associated long-term effects truly reflect. High MEQ scores (also after placebo) were observed in settings that involved more spiritual practice/support, and these scores and associated long-term changes may partly reflect such settingsand not the effects of psilocybin per se. Finally, the 5D-ASC and MEQ acute effect ratings were intercorrelated in the present study. In fact, the acute effect ratings on both the 5D-ASC and MEQ significantly predicted long-term changes in subjective wellbeing and life satisfaction on the PEQ at 12 months in the present study. In contrast, MEQ ratings and thus specifically the mystical-type experiences appeared to mainly predict various long-term effects of psilocybin in more spiritually active subjects. The present study has several limitations. First, the study did not include a true control condition for the long-term effects of LSD (i.e., a parallel control group for the long-term effects and not only for the acute effects of LSD). The lasting effects were subjectively to the LSD experience and/or compared with measures prior to the LSD session over time and within-subjects. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that all of these subjective effects were attributable to expectations of positive long-term effects of LSD. Second, the study sample was small and not sufficiently powered to detect small effects on personality. Third, the questionnaires were previously used in English but were mostly not validated and the translations not validated in German. Forth, the study was conducted in healthy subjects and used many safety precautions. Therefore, the results cannot necessarily be generalized to other settings or patients. Negative acute responses or negative long-term effects could occur in different populations or environments. In conclusion, after 1 year, a single LSD experience produced personal meaning and enhanced well-being, which were subjectively attributed to the LSD experience, but no relevant changes in measures of personality traits. Funding information This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant nos. 320030_1449493 and 320030_170249) and the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. Compliance with ethical standards The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee. All of the subjects provided written consent before participating in the study.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsdouble blindcrossoverplacebo controlledrandomizedfollow up
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topic
- Author