Ketamine Treatment and Global Brain Connectivity in Major Depression
This open-label, counterbalanced, between-subjects study (n=43) compared brain activity before and after ketamine (35mg/70kg) administration across healthy control and patients with major depression. The treatment normalized restored abnormally low brain connectivity levels in the prefrontal cortex of patients with depression, which may be indicative of a potential mechanism whereby ketamine restores synaptic dysconnectivity related to chronic stress and increased extracellular glutamate in the prefrontal cortex. The authors highlight the method of global brain connectivity with signal regression as a useful biomarker for quantifying treatment response to rapid-acting antidepressants.
Authors
- Abdallah, C. G.
- Anticevic, A.
- Averill, C.
Published
Abstract
Introduction: Capitalizing on recent advances in resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fcMRI) and the distinctive paradigm of rapid mood normalization following ketamine treatment, the current study investigated intrinsic brain networks in major depressive disorder (MDD) during a depressive episode and following treatment with ketamine.Methods: Medication-free patients with MDD and healthy control subjects (HC) completed baseline rs-fcMRI. MDD patients received a single infusion of ketamine and underwent repeated rs-fcMRI at 24 h posttreatment. Global brain connectivity with global signal regression (GBCr) values were computed as the average of correlations of each voxel with all other gray matter voxels in the brain.Results: MDD group showed reduced GBCr in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) but increased GBCr in the posterior cingulate, precuneus, lingual gyrus, and cerebellum. Ketamine significantly increased GBCr in the PFC and reduced GBCr in the cerebellum. At baseline, 2174 voxels of altered GBCr were identified, but only 310 voxels significantly differed relative to controls following treatment (corrected α<0.05). Responders to ketamine showed increased GBCr in the lateral PFC, caudate, and insula. Follow-up seed-based analyses illustrated a pattern of dysconnectivity between the PFC/subcortex and the rest of the brain in MDD, which appeared to normalize postketamine.Discussion: The extent of the functional dysconnectivity identified in MDD and the swift and robust normalization following treatment suggest that GBCr may serve as a treatment response biomarker for the development of rapid acting antidepressants. The data also identified unique prefrontal and striatal circuitry as a putative marker of successful treatment and a target for antidepressants' development.
Research Summary of 'Ketamine Treatment and Global Brain Connectivity in Major Depression'
Introduction
Resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rs-fcMRI) has revealed widespread alterations of large-scale brain networks in major depressive disorder (MDD), but most prior work used seed-based approaches that require preselecting regions of interest. Abdallah and colleagues adopted a fully data-driven, graph-based metric—global brain connectivity with global signal regression (GBCr)—to quantify whole-brain functional dysconnectivity without a priori seeds. GBCr indexes the average correlation of each voxel's BOLD time series with all other grey-matter voxels and has been related to regional cerebral blood flow and normal cognitive function in earlier studies. This study set out to compare GBCr in medication-free patients with MDD during a depressive episode versus healthy controls, and to test whether a single subanaesthetic infusion of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) would rapidly normalise GBCr abnormalities. The investigators hypothesised that MDD patients would show reduced prefrontal cortex (PFC) GBCr at baseline and that ketamine's rapid antidepressant effects—typically evident within 24 hours—would parallel increases in PFC GBCr, with greater GBCr change in clinical responders.
Methods
Participants were male and female adults aged 21–65 years. Eighteen patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for current MDD with at least moderate severity (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated score ⩾ 32) and documented nonresponse to at least two adequate antidepressant trials were enrolled, together with 25 healthy control (HC) volunteers free of lifetime psychiatric illness. Exclusion criteria included current alcohol or substance abuse disorder and lifetime bipolar or psychotic disorder. Patients were medication-free for at least one week prior to imaging; benzodiazepines were permitted as needed but withheld on scan days. Urine drug screen, medical stability and MRI safety were required. After baseline clinical assessment and structural and resting-state MRI, MDD participants received a single intravenous infusion of ketamine hydrochloride 0.5 mg/kg over 40 minutes in a monitored clinical research setting. Resting-state BOLD scans were repeated 24 hours after infusion. Depression severity was rated at baseline and 24 hours by independent, blinded raters using the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); response was defined as ⩾ 50% reduction in MADRS score. Imaging used a Philips 3.0 T scanner with standard high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical scans and a resting-state BOLD acquisition (TR = 2000 ms; 120 frames; voxel dimensions ≈2.2 × 2.2 × 3.25 mm). Participants rested with eyes open. GBCr for each voxel was calculated as the average correlation between that voxel's BOLD time series and all other grey-matter voxels; the authors note prior methodological details and rationale in supplementary material. Statistical analyses compared demographic features with t-tests and chi-square tests. Voxel-wise GBCr contrasts used independent t-tests for between-group comparisons and paired t-tests for within-subject pre/post treatment comparisons. Delta GBCr (post minus pre) was compared between responders and non-responders. Type I error was controlled by peak and cluster-extent correction; all tests were two-tailed with significance at p ⩽ 0.05. Non-parametric permutation testing (5,000 permutations) was used to confirm responder-related findings.
Results
Eighteen MDD patients and 25 healthy controls completed the protocol. Groups did not differ significantly in age, gender, race or education. The MDD sample had a chronic, treatment-refractory illness course. Ten of 18 patients (56%) met the response criterion at 24 hours post-ketamine. Depression severity decreased significantly after treatment: mean delta MADRS = 14.2 ± 1.9, t(17) = 7.6, p = 0.000001. At baseline, voxel-wise whole-brain comparisons revealed widespread GBCr abnormalities in MDD relative to HC. Seven PFC clusters showed significantly reduced GBCr in MDD. Areas of relatively increased GBCr in MDD at baseline included the posterior cingulate, precuneus, lingual gyrus/occipital cortex and extensive cerebellar regions. Across the brain, 2,174 voxels showed altered GBCr in the preketamine MDD vs HC contrast (corrected p < 0.05). Twenty-four hours after ketamine, GBCr abnormalities were markedly reduced in spatial extent: only 310 voxels differed between MDD and HC, of which 123 overlapped with the baseline set. Paired within-subject tests showed significant post-treatment increases in GBCr in the right lateral PFC and reductions in the left cerebellum. Changes in GBCr related to clinical response. Delta GBCr was higher in responders than non-responders in the right lateral PFC and the left anterior insula; a 5,000-permutation non-parametric test produced similar clusters. No baseline GBCr differences distinguished future responders from non-responders. Postketamine, responders exhibited significantly higher GBCr than non-responders in five clusters: bilateral caudate, bilateral lateral PFC and left middle temporal cortex, and individual-level plots related delta GBCr in these clusters to percentage MADRS improvement. Distribution analyses of PFC GBCr showed a large effect-size leftward shift (reduced PFC GBCr) in preketamine MDD vs HC: Cohen's d = 0.95 (CI 0.91–0.99). Postketamine, the PFC GBCr distribution in responders overlapped more with controls (d = 0.46, CI 0.43–0.50), whereas non-responders retained a large left shift (d = 0.92, CI 0.87–0.97). Follow-up seed-based analyses provided preliminary circuit-level detail. Using a priori seeds in sgACC, DLPFC and PCC, MDD subjects demonstrated increased short-range connectivity within the PFC but reduced long-range connectivity between PFC and the rest of the brain; ketamine reduced within-PFC connectivity and enhanced PFC-to-other-region connectivity. Data-dependent seeds in lateral PFC and caudate (clusters that increased GBCr in responders) showed that, compared with non-responders, responders had greater postketamine lPFC and caudate connectivity with regions outside the PFC/subcortex but lower within-PFC/subcortical connectivity.
Discussion
Abdallah and colleagues interpret the findings as evidence that MDD during a depressive episode is characterised by reduced prefrontal global connectivity and that a single ketamine infusion largely normalises these PFC GBCr abnormalities within 24 hours. Responders showed more pronounced increases in PFC, caudate and insula GBCr, implicating these frontal and striatal circuits in successful antidepressant response. Elevated baseline GBCr in posterior midline and occipital regions and extensive cerebellar hyperconnectivity were noted and showed partial or full normalisation after treatment. The authors discuss two non-mutually exclusive interpretations. One is that GBCr abnormalities are state-dependent and reverse with successful treatment regardless of treatment modality; the alternative is that GBCr partly reflects trait-related pathology that ketamine specifically targets. They propose, drawing on preclinical studies, that GBCr may under some circumstances index regional synaptic strength because of its positive association with regional cerebral blood flow and metabolic measures; thus reduced PFC GBCr could reflect chronic stress-related synaptic loss, and rapid restoration of GBCr after ketamine may mirror synaptogenic effects observed in animal models. The paper situates the results within broader literature showing PFC GBCr reductions across several chronic stress–related psychiatric disorders and notes differences in the anatomical distribution of abnormalities across conditions. The authors also propose a mechanistic model in which depression is associated with increased local (short-range) connectivity within PFC/subcortex and reduced long-range connectivity with the rest of the brain, and ketamine restores long-range integration and the PFC's central role in global network function. Key limitations are acknowledged: the sample included comorbid anxiety disorders which might have affected GBCr; the medication-free period was brief so residual effects of prior antidepressants cannot be excluded; resting-state acquisitions were relatively short; and the responder subgroup analysis had limited sample size making those findings preliminary. The authors further note that GBC without global signal regression did not detect MDD abnormalities in this cohort, and that the study examined only a single post-treatment time point so duration of connectivity changes is unknown. They call for multimodal and larger studies, including placebo and conventional antidepressant comparators, to test specificity, to relate GBCr to synaptic measures (for example using SV2A PET or metabolic spectroscopy), and to determine the temporal persistence and clinical utility of GBCr as a biomarker for rapid-acting antidepressants.
View full paper sections
INTRODUCTION
Resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fcMRI) is a powerful tool for interrogating in vivo large-scale brain networks in health and disease. Major depressive disorder (MDD), a debilitating mental illness with high rates of treatment nonresponse, shows widespread dysconnectivity as measured by rs-fcMRI. Early studies have primarily used seed-based methods to identify altered networks in MDD. Such approaches are limited by the need for a priori selection of a seed area, and novel analyses have been developed to conduct fully data-driven assessment of whole-brain connectivity without the need for seed selection. Here we used a recently implemented and optimized graph-based measure, termed global brain connectivity with global signal regression (GBCr), to quantify functional dysconnectivity measured via resting-state blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI in MDD patients. We examined GBCr at baseline during a depressive episode and 24 h following administration of a novel putative rapidly acting antidepressant, ketamine. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist, exerts rapid antidepressant effects with a response rate of 50-60% in treatment-resistant MDD patients. The peak response rates have been reported within 24 h after administration of a single subanesthetic dose (typically 0.5 mg/kg). This rapid mood effect, even in chronic and severely depressed patients, offers a unique pharmacoimaging paradigm to investigate the neural correlates of antidepressant response as well as to determine state vs trait brain abnormalities in MDD. This pharmacological paradigm also allows the investigation of the neurobiological mechanisms hypothesized to underlie depression and antidepressants' effect. Preclinical models of depression and chronic stress show prefrontal synaptic dysconnectivity and homeostasis as the underlying mechanism of depression and rapid acting antidepressants, respectively. These studies demonstrate reduced brain neurotrophins, dendritic arborization, spine density, and synaptic strength following chronic stress, which rapidly normalize within 24 h of ketamine treatment. Consistent with this model, central (eg reduced hippocampal volume) and peripheral abnormalities (eg, reduced brainderived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)) have been demonstrated in depression and other stress-related psychiatric disorders. In addition, synaptic strength enhancement following ketamine treatment was recently reported in humans and was related to increased BDNF and treatment response in depressed patients. It remains unknown, however, if the rapid enhancement of synaptic structure and function observed in animal models following ketamine can be demonstrated in humans at the level of functional connectivity in patients with depression. Studies in depression have reported functional connectivity abnormalities within the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and other cortical and subcortical regions. However, owing to the significant heterogeneity of approaches and findings, the essential network alterations in MDD have yet to be determined. In an effort to implement a simple, robust biomarker of intrinsic brain networks and to circumvent some of the seed-based analysis limitations, here we used GBCr to quantify brain dysconnectivity in MDD and to relate these abnormalities to rapid mood normalization following treatment in a fully data-driven manner. Accumulating evidence indicates that GBCr is a valid biomarker of large-scale intrinsic brain networks. GBCr correlates with normal brain functions (eg, cognition)) and with regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Moreover, GBCr has been successfully used to identify alterations across major networks in clinical conditions. Reduced PFC GBCr was reported in bipolar, chronic schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorders; all of which harbor a strong component of chronic stress and were previously related to glutamate synaptic homeostasis. Additionally, ketamine has been repeatedly shown to increase PFC GBCr during ketamine infusion in healthy volunteers. Based on the above data, we hypothesize that patients with MDD in a current depressive episode will show GBCr alterations relative to HC, in particular, reduced PFC GBCr. We hypothesize that the rapid mood normalization following ketamine treatment would parallel a phenomenon of functional connectivity normalization and that the increases in PFC GBCr would be associated with the ketamine antidepressant response.
SUBJECTS
The current study enrolled male and female individuals aged 21-65 years with MDD and healthy control volunteers (HC). Enrollment and treatment procedures have been previously reported. Study criteria included negative urine drug screen, no unstable medical illness, and no MR contraindication. MDD patients had to have failures of two adequate antidepressant trials as determined by a standardized questionnaire, be antidepressants/antipsychotics-free for at least 1 week prior to imaging (as needed benzodiazepines were allowed but withheld the day of each scan), and meet criteria of current major depressive episode with MDD diagnosis as determined by a structured clinical interview. Patients were in a current depressive episode as determined by the SCID-IV and at least moderate severity with score of ⩾ 32 on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated. Current alcohol or substance abuse disorder and lifetime history of bipolar or psychotic disorder were exclusionary. HC were free of lifetime psychiatric illness.
STUDY PROCEDURES
Following medical and psychiatric assessment, eligible participants completed baseline structural MRI and rs-fcMRI scans (see Supplementary Figure). Within a week of baseline scans, ketamine 0.5 mg/kg infusion over 40 min was administered intravenously to MDD participants as previously described. Briefly, patients were admitted to a clinical research unit; an indwelling catheter was placed in the antecubital vein of the non-dominant arm, and pulse, blood pressure, digital pulse oximetry, and ECG monitoring were instituted. An anesthesiologist administered ketamine hydrochloride via an infusion pump and patients were discharged home following a 4 h recovery period. MDD patients underwent a repeated rs-fcMRI scan 24 h after ketamine infusion. Depression severity, at baseline and 24 h after ketamine, was determined by independent raters blinded to the treatment using the clinician-administered Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Patients were divided into responders and non-responders to treatment. As widely accepted, depression response was defined as ⩾ 50% reduction in MADRS scores.
NEUROIMAGING DATA ACQUISITION
Philips Achieva 3.0 T X-series MRI using an eight-channel birdcage head coil for radio frequency transmission and reception was used. High-resolution T1-weighted images were collected using a three-dimensional turbo field echo sequence (3D_TFE; repetition time = 7.5 ms; echo time = 3.5 ms; voxel dimensions = 1 × 1 × 1 mm 3 ; field of view = 224 × 224 mm 2 ; flip angle: 8°) and 172 sagittal slices. Participants were instructed to rest with their eyes open during the resting-state scan. Resting-state functional data based on the BOLD signal was acquired using a T2*-weighted gradient echo-planar imaging sequence (repetition time = 2000 ms; echo time = 26.6 ms; voxel dimensions = 2.2 × 2.2 × 3.25 mm 3 ; field of view = 210 × 210 mm 2 ; flip angle = 90°, 120 frames) and 38 contiguous and ascending near-axial slices parallel to the intercommissural (AC-PC). Following the resting-state acquisition, taskbased fMRI and diffusion tensor imaging scans were acquired during the same session. Only the resting-state data were examined in the current report.
GBCR VALUES
Details of GBCr methods were previously described) (see Supplementary Information). GBCr value for each voxel is the average of the correlation between the BOLD time series of a voxel and all other gray matter voxels in the brain. In graph theory terms, Global Brain Connectivity (also known as Functional Connectivity Strength;is considered a measure of nodal strength of a voxel in the whole brain network-determining brain hubs and examining the coherence between a local region and the rest of the brain.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES
For additional details, see Supplementary Information. Briefly, demographic differences between the study groups were examined using t-test and chi-square. Paired t-test examined the effect of treatment on depression severity and on GBCr. Independent t-tests were conducted to compare voxel-wise GBCr and seed-based maps between groups. Type I error correction was based on peak and cluster extent. All tests are two-tailed with significance set at p ⩽ 0.05.
CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Eighteen MDD and 25 HC participants successfully completed all the study procedures. Age, gender, race, and education did not differ between groups (see Supplementary Table). MDD patients on average had a chronic and treatment-refractory course of illness (Supplementary Table). Following ketamine treatment, 10 (56%) MDD patients achieved response. Paired t-test showed a significant effect of treatment on depression severity; delta MADRS = 14.2 ± 1.9, t = 7.6, df = 17, p = 0.000001 (Supplementary Figure).
GBCR VALUES PREKETAMINE AND POSTKETAMINE
Prior to treatment, whole-brain comparison revealed widespread dysconnectivity in MDD (Figure; Supplementary Figure). Altered GBCr voxels were spread over 12 clusters (Table). Seven clusters, all of which in the PFC, showed significant reduction in GBCr in MDD compared with HC (Table). Following treatment, GBCr abnormalities of increased or reduced GBCr in MDD were divided over three small clusters (Figure; Supplementary Figure; Table). Examining the changes in GBCr over the treatment period, a paired t-test revealed significant increases in the right lateral PFC and reductions in the left cerebellum (Supplementary Figure; Table).
GBCR AND TREATMENT RESPONSE
Delta GBCr (postketaminepreketamine) was compared using t-test between responders and non-responders. Responders showed higher delta GBCr values in the right lateral PFC and the left anterior insula (Supplementary Figure). To further assess the robustness of the findings, the results were confirmed by a non-parametric test with 5000 permutations that showed similar clusters (data not shown). Preketamine showed no GBCr differences between future responders and non-responders. However, postketamine comparison revealed five clusters of significantly higher GBCr in responders compared with non-responders. These clusters were found in the left and right caudate, left and right lateral PFC (lPFC), and left middle temporal (Figure). To illustrate, at the individual level, the spread of GBCr changes in these clusters, we plotted the average delta GBCr (posttreatmentpretreatment) for each of the five clusters in relation to percentage of improvement in MADRS scores (Figure).
EXPLORATION OF GBCR DISTRIBUTIONS PREKETAMINE AND POSTKETAMINE
To explore the spread of GBCr abnormalities in MDD at baseline and following treatment, we extracted the absolute z-values of all brain voxels showing GBCr alterations preketamine or postketamine (Figure). Preketamine MDD vs HC comparison showed GBCr abnormalities in a total of 2174 voxels (ie, reduced or increased GBCr in MDD with corrected αo0.05). In the postketamine MDD vs HC comparison, 310 voxels differed between groups, of which 123 voxels overlapped with baseline comparison (Figure). To further delineate the distribution of GBCr alteration in the PFC, we plotted the average GBCr of each PFC voxel across all subjects in each study group. As shown in Figure, comparison of PFC GBCr distributions of preketamine MDD vs HC showed a left shift of large effect size reduction in PFC GBCr values in the MDD group, Cohen's d = 0.95, CI = (0.91, 0.99). The PFC GBCr distributions postketamine in responders vs HC largely overlapped with remaining smaller effect size left shift, Cohen's d = 0.46, CI = (0.43, 0.50) (Figure). However, similar to preketamine, we noticed postketamine a large effect size of left shift PFC GBCr distribution in non-responders compared with HC, Cohen's d = 0.92, CI = (0.87, 0.97) (Figure).
EXPLORATORY SEED-BASED ANALYSES
To provide preliminary data illustrating the circuitry underlying GBCr alterations, we conducted two follow-up seedbased analyses. The first analysis used data-independent a priori seeds in the affective (subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC)), cognitive control (dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC)), and default mode networks (posterior cingulate/ precuneus (PCC)). In this analysis, the MDD group showed an increase in connectivity within the PFC, in contrast with a reduction in connectivity between the PFC and the rest of the brain (Figure). Ketamine significantly reduced the connectivity within the PFC and enhanced connectivity between the PFC and other brain regions (Figure). The second analysis used data-dependent seeds of the four clusters in the lPFC and caudate (Figure), which showed increased GBCr in responders. Compared with non-responders, postketamine seed-based analysis revealed increased lPFC and caudate connectivity with several brain regions outside the PFC/subcortex. However, responders showed lower connectivity within the PFC and subcortical regions (Supplementary Figure).
DISCUSSION
We found reduced GBCr within the PFC in patients with MDD compared with healthy subjects and this largely normalized 24 h following ketamine. Responders to ketamine treatment evidenced more robust increases in PFC, caudate, and insula GBCr compared with non-responders, implicating enhancement of GBCr in the antidepressant mechanism of action of ketamine. High GBCr values in preketamine MDD compared with HC were found in the posterior cingulate, precuneus, and occipital cortices; all of which normalized following treatment. Large clusters of high GBCr were also found in the cerebellum, which only partially normalized following treatment. Although baseline GBCr was not related to treatment response, postketamine GBCr distinguished brain regions, which showed increased GBCr in responders compared with non-responders (Figure). Of note, given the very short half-life of ketamine and its active metabolite norketamine (both o2 h), our functional imaging results at 24 h are not confounded by the presence of ketamine. A working model of depression and chronic stress proposes prefrontal glutamate synaptic dysconnectivity as a key underlying neural correlate of depression. In this model, antidepressants exert their effects-at least in part-by restoring synaptic homeostasis in the PFC and other brain regions critical to emotion regulation. In the current study, the rapid normalization of functional connectivity following successful treatment with ketamine suggests at least two possibilities. The first interpretation is that the observed GBCr abnormalities are state dependent and are likely to normalize with successful treatment regardless of the specific treatment modality, be it a rapidly acting drug, traditional antidepressant, psychotherapy, or placebo. The second possibility is that GBCr abnormalities are at least partially trait-dependent and related to the etiology of depression; however, the unique mechanisms of ketamine normalized these large-scale abnormalities. These possibilities are not necessarily mutually exclusive, considering the widespread abnormalities and the differential normalization in connectivity across different brain regions. In addition, neurobiological mechanisms of mental disorders such as MDD are likely complex and involve interacting circuitry and molecular alterations. However, concurring with the mathematician George Box that 'all models are wrong but some are useful', we believe that these working hypotheses provide insight into valuable mechanistic questions to be further explored in future studies. (1) Is GBCr normalization unique to ketamine treatment? A definitive answer could be obtained in future studies including placebo and traditional antidepressant arms to compare with ketamine (see Supplementary Information). Prior evidence suggests that traditional antidepressants may reverse some intrinsic network abnormalities identified using seed-based analyses or other approaches. However, the swift and robust connectivity networks' normalization revealed in this study were not previously observed. (2) What is the relationship between GBCr abnormalities and synaptic dysconnectivity? Although speculative in nature, our working hypothesis is that GBCr-under certain circumstances-may reflect overall synaptic strength in a brain region. Considering the tight coupling between synaptic strength, glutamate cycling, and neuroenergetics, it is important to highlight that GBCr has been found to positively correlate with rCBF. Similarly, other GBC-type measures were positively associated with rCBF and cerebral metabolic rate of glucose. In this context, the observed PFC reduction in GBCr could be an indirect measure of chronic stress-induced synaptic dysconnectivity. Consistent with this hypothesis is the rapid normalization, in the current study, of GBCr following ketamine, which is known to rapidly restore synaptic homeostasis in animal models. Moreover, the GBCr changes were associated with treatment response, which parallel prior evidence showing that the normalization of synaptic connectivity is necessary for successful antidepressant treatments. Prefrontal GBCr reduction has been observed in several chronic psychiatric disorders (ie, bipolar, obsessive-compulsive, and schizophrenia), all of which are influenced by chronic stress. Acute stress has been found to increase synaptic strength. In contrast, chronic stress is believed to precipitate glutamatergic dysregulation, leading to increased extracellular glutamate, and excitotoxicity, with subsequent synaptic dysconnectivity and reduced synaptic strength. Intriguingly, earlycourse schizophrenia patients were found to have increased PFC GBCr. However, following a long course of illness, chronic schizophrenia patients showed significant reduction in PFC GBCr. These observations suggest the possibility of increased overall glutamate synaptic strength early in the course of the disorder, comparable to NMDA antagonists' effect-which temporally increase glutamate activities as well as GBCr in healthy volunteers. However, the chronic glutamate activation-owing to NMDA hypofunction and/or psychopathology-related stress-precipitates PFC synaptic dysconnectivity and GBCr reduction. Together these data support a relationship between GBCr and underlying synaptic strength; however, the circumstances under which this relationship is maintained and the nature of this relationship (causal vs correlational) remain to be ascertained in future studies. (3) To what extent are the observed GBCr abnormalities specific to MDD, rather than reflecting a nonspecific effect of chronic stress? As described above, it is plausible that GBCr abnormalities are at least partially related to the detrimental effects of chronic stress on synaptic homeostasis. However, this proposed phenomenon is unlikely to explain all the observed GBCr abnormalities in MDD. The interaction between the effects of chronic stress and the unique psychopathology of disorders is likely to lead to differential intrinsic network dysconnectivity, resulting in disease-specific regional abnormalities. For example, although the GBCr alterations were reported in the frontal region of various stress-related psychiatric disorders, there appear to be limited overlap between the locations of abnormal clusters. In addition, some regional GBCr abnormalities may be disease specific, eg, putamen in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Similar to the current findings in MDD, the increase in cerebellar GBCr was found in OCD. However, the posterior cingulate and precuneus clusters-which may reflect alterations in default mode subnetworks-appear to be specific to MDD. It remains to be demonstrated in future study the distribution of GBCr abnormalities in other stress-related disorders, eg, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). (4) What are the long-term effects of ketamine on GBCr? It is important to highlight that the observed GBCr changes were demonstrated at a single time point and that they occurred following a single infusion of ketamine. Thus it is not known for how long the GBCr changes would last and whether repeated ketamine would have comparable effects. To the extent the observed GBCr changes are related to depression relief and to the ketamine-induced synaptogenesis, we speculate that GBCr changes could last for about 10 days; that is the approximate length of antidepressant response in humansand of the synaptogenic effects in rodents. Frequent daily administration of ketamine could lead to repeated glutamate surge, increased extracellular glutamate, excitotoxity, and synaptic dysconnectivity comparable to chronic stress models of depression, consistent clinical data showing impaired cognition and depressive symptomatology in ketamine abusers. However, much more human research in necessary to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of ketamine, which is not currently FDA approved for depression treatment. (5) What circuits are putatively involved in successful antidepressant treatment? Supporting previous reports, we found increased sgACC and DLFPC connectivity (which normalized following treatment) with the dorsomedial PFC, an area termed the dorsal nexus and previously implicated in the pathophysiology and treatment of MDD. Integrating the GBCr and seed-based results, we hypothesize that during depression the brain connectivity balance is altered in favor of short distance connectivity within the PFC/subcortex, combined with long distance disconnect with the rest of the brain. Ketamine normalizes this PFC/subcortex dysconnectivity, by enhancing long distance connectivity and restoring the central role of the PFC in global functions. Consistent with this model, the current study identified specific regions in the lPFC and caudate as neural correlates to successful treatment, in which these brain regions showed more central and balanced connectivity in responders. These frontal and striatal regions have a critical role in higher cognitive control, in particular, in exploration and goal-directed behavior. Thus it is plausible that the enhanced engagement of these frontostriatal regions underlies the behavioral shift from depression, withdrawal, and rumination to exploratory and externally focused behavior following recovery.
LIMITATIONS
This study has several limitations. Given the comorbidity of anxiety disorders in the study sample, it is conceivable that anxiety pathology contributed to the GBCr alterations. Also, given the short medication-free period, we cannot rule out the presence of residual effects from prior antidepressant use on GBCr. Although age did not differ statistically between groups (p = 0.88), numerically the MDD group was 4 years older than the HC group. The short rs-fcMRI scan acquisition is a limitation. Although short resting-state acquisition has previously been shown sufficient, considering recent findings and advances in addressing motion artifacts, future studies would benefit from longer acquisition time (eg, 3 × 5 min sessions). Another limitation is the relatively small sample size in the response analysis; thus this finding should be considered preliminary. GBC without global signal regression (GBCnr) failed to detect abnormalities in MDD (see Supplementary Information). It is plausible that GBCrenhanced sensitivity provided increased power to detect differences in the current cohort. It remains to be determined in future larger studies the utility of GBCnr as a biomarker in ketamine-MDD research. Finally, we speculated about the potential mechanisms of GBCr abnormalities and normalization; however, the current report did not per se investigate the underlying mechanisms. Considering the current findings, future studies are encouraged to employ a multimodal approach investigating the structural (eg, diffusion weighted imaging), chemical (eg, synaptic density using SV2A tracer or glutamate cycling using 13C spectroscopy), and functional (eg, task-based fMRI) correlates of GBCr alterations. The findings of the current report support the use of the GBCr approach to successfully identify intrinsic network dysconnectivity in MDD patients, and provides preliminary evidence regarding the utility of GBCr as a biomarker of target validation for drug development.
Full Text PDF
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsopen labelparallel groupbrain measures
- Journal
- Compound