Interactions of hallucinogens with the glutamatergic system: permissive network effects mediated through cortical layer V pyramidal neurons

This chapter (2017) reviews the effects of serotonergic psychedelics on cortical layer V pyramidal neurons.

Authors

  • Marek, G. J.

Published

Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
meta Study

Abstract

Recordings made from layer V (L5) pyramidal cells of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and neocortex in rodent slice preparations have shown that serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and serotonergic hallucinogens induce an increase in the frequency of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in the apical dendritic field by activating 5-HT2A receptors. Serotonergic hallucinogens induce late EPSCs and increase recurrent network activity when subcortical or mid-cortical regions are stimulated at low frequencies (e.g., 0.1 Hz). A range of agonists or positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) for mostly Gi/o-coupled receptors, including metabotropic glutamate2 (mGlu2), adenosine A1, or μ-opioid receptors, suppress these effects of 5-HT2A receptor stimulation. Furthermore, a range of mostly Gq/11-coupled receptors (including orexin2 [OX2]; α1-adrenergic, and mGlu5 receptors) similarly induce glutamate (Glu) release onto L5 pyramidal cells. Evidence implicates a number of brain regions in mediating these effects of serotonergic hallucinogens and Gq/11-coupled receptors including the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei, claustrum, and neurons in deep PFC. These effects on 5-HT2A receptors and related GPCRs appear to play a major role in the behavioral effects of serotonergic hallucinogens, such as head twitches in rodents and higher order behaviors such as rodent lever pressing on the differential-reinforcement-of-low rate 72-s (DRL 72-s) schedule. This implies that the effects of 5-HT2A receptor activation on the activity of L5 pyramidal cells may be responsible for mediating a range of behaviors linked to limbic circuitry with connectivity between the PFC, striatum, thalamus, claustrum, striatum, amygdala, and the hippocampal formation.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Interactions of hallucinogens with the glutamatergic system: permissive network effects mediated through cortical layer V pyramidal neurons'

Introduction

Marek frames this chapter as an integration of decades of electrophysiological, pharmacological, lesion, behavioural and clinical evidence linking serotonergic hallucinogens to glutamatergic signalling in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and neocortex. Earlier work established that LSD, mescaline and psilocybin share potent agonism at 5-HT2A receptors and that activation of these receptors can produce psychotomimetic effects. Over time, however, it became clear that simple 5-HT2A blockade does not fully account for the clinical picture of psychosis and that interactions with glutamate transmission, especially onto layer V (L5) pyramidal neurons, offer a richer mechanistic account relevant to perception, cognition, mood and potential therapeutics. This review sets out to synthesise findings showing that 5-HT2A receptor activation evokes glutamate (Glu) release onto the apical dendritic field of L5 pyramidal cells, producing spontaneous and late excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) and recurrent network activity. Marek aims to connect cellular and circuit-level mechanisms (including the likely involvement of midline/intralaminar thalamic nuclei, claustrum and deep PFC neurons) to behavioural readouts in rodents and to clinical observations, with attention to the modulatory roles of many G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that either enhance or suppress this Glu release.

Methods

This paper is a narrative review assembling evidence from multiple experimental modalities rather than reporting a new empirical study. The material marshalled includes in vitro electrophysiology from rodent brain slices (intracellular and whole-cell recordings from L5 pyramidal neurons), focal electrical stimulation paradigms, pharmacological manipulations (agonists, antagonists, PAMs and NAMs at a range of GPCRs), fibre-sparing and chemical lesions (notably of midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei), anterograde labelling and two-photon calcium imaging, and a variety of in vivo rodent behavioural assays (head-twitch response, 5-choice serial reaction time test, differential-reinforcement-of-low rate 72-s operant schedules, locomotor and antidepressant-like screens). Clinical data integrated into the review comprise results from trials and case series testing selective 5-HT2A antagonists/inverse agonists, mGlu2 ligands, opioid-modulating agents, orexin antagonists, and rapidly acting antidepressants such as ketamine and scopolamine. Where available, receptor autoradiography, immunohistochemistry and mRNA localisation studies are used to infer receptor distributions and potential presynaptic versus postsynaptic localisation. The extracted text does not report systematic search methods, inclusion/exclusion criteria, databases searched or formal meta-analytic procedures; the review therefore appears to be a focused synthesis of selected primary studies and mechanistic evidence rather than a systematic review with explicit reproducible methodology.

Results

At the cellular level, multiple slice studies demonstrate that bath application of serotonin (5-HT) or serotonergic hallucinogens (examples: LSD 10 nM, DOI 3 µM) increases the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs recorded in the apical dendritic field of PFC and neocortical L5 pyramidal neurons. These 5-HT-induced synaptic currents are: potently blocked by 5-HT2A antagonists; largely dependent on AMPA receptors (blocked by LY293558); abolished by TTX and by zero-calcium/high-magnesium perfusion; minimally affected by GABAA antagonism (<15% suppression by bicuculline); and mimicked by focal iontophoretic 5-HT application to layers I and Va. When combined with focal low-frequency electrical stimulation (≈0.1–1 Hz), serotonergic hallucinogens induce late EPSCs or prolonged recurrent ‘‘Glu spillover’’ and UP-state-like network activity that can persist long after washout. Several lines of evidence implicate subcortical thalamic afferents as a major source of the glutamate release onto L5 apical dendrites: midline and intralaminar thalamic lesions reduce 5-HT-induced EPSC frequency by ~61–67% and reduce mGlu2/3 and μ-opioid receptor binding in layers I and Va (reported reductions ≈20% for mGlu2/3 and ≈40% for μ-opioid sites). Complementary experiments using anterograde labelling and two-photon calcium imaging show hypocretin-2 (OX2 receptor agonist) induced calcium transients in apical spines apposed to thalamic terminals, and thalamic lesions suppress hypocretin-induced EPSCs. Nonetheless, lesion data and some gene-rescue experiments leave open additional potential sources including the claustrum and intrinsic cortical projections. Pharmacologically, a consistent theme is reciprocal modulation of the 5-HT2A–driven Glu release by multiple GPCRs. Agonists or PAMs at predominantly Gi/o-coupled receptors suppress the 5-HT/DOI-induced EPSCs; these include mGlu2 (orthosteric agonists LY354740, LY379268 and selective mGlu2 PAMs), mGlu4, mGlu8, adenosine A1, and μ-opioid receptors. Gs-coupled receptor activation (dopamine D1/D5 agonists like SKF38393, adenylyl cyclase activation by forskolin, or 8-Br-cAMP) also suppresses DOI-induced recurrent activity, mechanistically linked to upregulation of EAAT3 and downstream cAMP signalling. Conversely, activation of several Gq/11-coupled receptors (α1-adrenergic, mGlu5, OX2, NK3) or α4β2 nicotinic receptors similarly induces feedforward Glu release onto L5 cells, with characteristic dependence on TTX and AMPA receptors and suppression by μ-opioid agonists. Behavioural correlates in rodents align with the slice physiology: the DOI-induced head-twitch response (HTR) is attenuated by mGlu2/3 agonists and mGlu2 PAMs, adenosine A1 agonists, μ-opioid agonists, mGlu4 PAMs, some NK3 antagonists, α1-adrenergic antagonists, OX2 antagonists and β2-adrenergic agonists. The 5-CSRTT and DRL-72s paradigms link 5-HT2A activation and Glu modulation to motoric impulsivity and antidepressant-like effects respectively: intra-mPFC DOI increases impulsivity (suppressed by mGlu2/3 agonists and α1 antagonists), while 5-HT2A antagonists and agents that suppress Glu release (mGlu2 PAMs, adenosine A1 agonists, OX2 blockade) produce antidepressant-like rightward shifts in DRL behaviour. Not all modulators produce consistent behavioural translations—for example, nicotine suppresses HTR despite increasing spontaneous EPSCs and dopamine D1/5 effects show mixed behavioural findings. At the receptor interaction level, in vitro BRET/FRET studies support co-localisation of 5-HT2A and mGlu2 receptors and raise the possibility of heterocomplexes; functional evidence is mixed. Some mutational data implicate direct 5-HT2A–mGlu2 interactions, yet autoradiography, lesion and distribution studies emphasise a largely presynaptic role for mGlu2 and a predominantly postsynaptic localisation for 5-HT2A, leaving open three hypotheses: purely functional interactions, heterocomplex-mediated interactions, or a combination. Clinical translations are heterogeneous. Selective 5-HT2A antagonists showed limited efficacy as monotherapy in schizophrenia, but pimavanserin (a 5-HT2A inverse agonist) produced clinically meaningful benefit in Parkinson's disease psychosis and has encouraging signals in Alzheimer's disease psychosis. A clinical trial of an mGlu2 PAM added to SSRI/SNRI treatment showed only a non-significant trend in major depressive disorder; buprenorphine (μ-opioid partial agonist/κ antagonist) has open-label antidepressant signals. Rapid-acting antidepressants (ketamine, scopolamine) produce synaptogenic and electrophysiological changes in L5 pyramidal neurons—ketamine increases spontaneous EPSCs and induces new spine formation within 24 h, effects tied to mTOR signalling and potentiated by lithium—supporting the circuit-level relevance of these cellular phenomena to mood outcomes.

Discussion

Marek interprets the assembled data to support a working model in which activation of cortical 5-HT2A receptors leads to glutamate release onto the apical dendrites of L5 pyramidal neurons, promoting recurrent cortical activity that can influence downstream limbic and subcortical circuits. This ‘‘permissive network’’ effect, mediated at least in part by thalamocortical and possibly claustral or intracortical afferents, provides a unifying mechanism linking hallucinogen pharmacology to observable behaviours in rodents and to certain clinical phenomena in humans. The review emphasises that a broad array of GPCRs can modulate this 5-HT2A-driven Glu release in predictable ways: Gi/o-coupled receptors tend to suppress Glu spillover, whereas multiple Gq/11-coupled receptors can themselves induce feedforward Glu release. These interactions offer mechanistic explanations for why manipulations at mGlu2, adenosine A1, opioid, orexin, adrenergic and dopaminergic systems alter both electrophysiological signatures and behavioural outcomes such as head twitches, impulsivity and DRL performance. Marek positions these mechanistic insights as a rationale for exploring non-schizophrenia therapeutic indications—examples being pimavanserin in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's psychosis, and adjunctive opioid or orexin strategies in mood disorders. The authors acknowledge important uncertainties and limitations. The precise source(s) of the glutamatergic afferents remain incompletely resolved: midline/intralaminar thalamic nuclei are strongly implicated but do not account for the entirety of effects, leaving room for claustral or intrinsic cortical contributions. Technical limitations—such as antibody sensitivity for presynaptic 5-HT2A detection, promoter-driven expression patterns in gene-rescue models, and the interpretative limits of in vitro heteromer assays—are discussed. Translational gaps are also noted: robust preclinical modulation of 5-HT2A–Glu interactions has not consistently produced clear clinical efficacy in schizophrenia, though successes in neurodegenerative psychoses and with rapid-acting antidepressants demonstrate that circuit-informed targets can translate under some conditions. Marek calls for further mechanistic work using modern approaches (optogenetics, gene-based targeting, refined receptor pharmacology) to resolve receptor localisation, heterocomplex existence and circuit-level causality, and to better guide clinical development.

Conclusion

Marek concludes that serotonergic hallucinogens exert prominent effects on PFC and neocortical circuitry by engaging 5-HT2A receptors and provoking glutamate release onto L5 pyramidal neurons, with downstream consequences for network dynamics and behaviour. A wide range of receptor systems can modulate this Glu release and the associated behaviours, and some of these targets have produced promising clinical effects (notably pimavanserin in Parkinson's disease psychosis and synaptogenic effects of ketamine and scopolamine relevant to antidepressant action). Nonetheless, important questions about afferent sources, receptor–receptor interactions, post-receptor signalling and circuit-level roles remain, and resolving these will be necessary to translate mechanistic insights into new treatments for psychosis, depression and related conditions.

View full paper sections

SECTION

The present chapter will detail the emergence over the last several decades of evidence demonstrating that hallucinogenic drugs share a common pharmacological action in stimulating cortical 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT 2A ) receptors, which may provide an important clue to the treatment of psychotic disorders. While focusing on psychosis and potential links to lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)induced perceptual changes, we will also discuss hallucinogen-induced changes in mood and cognition as well as potential therapeutic applications. The genesis of this line of work began in many ways with the discovery of LSD by the Sandoz chemist Albert Hoffman in the early 1940s and the observation that this drug, like mescaline, appears to mimic certain symptoms exhibited by patients with schizophrenia. Woolley and Shaw first suggested that the serotonergic properties of LSD might explain its psychotomimetic effects. By the late 1970s and early 1980s, convergent receptor binding, behavioral and electrophysiological studies suggested that LSD, mescaline, and psilocybin all share a common agonist action at 5-HT 2A receptors. While both stimulants like amphetamine and Nmethyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists such as phencyclidine (PCP) and ketamine began to overtake serotonergic hallucinogens as models of a broader range of the symptoms of schizophrenia, others continued to use hallucinogen effects on 5-HT 2A receptors as a model psychosis with potential links to the family of schizophrenic disorders. More recently, evidence has accrued for pathophysiologic and therapeutic influences of 5-HT 2A receptors in neurodegenerative disease states ranging from Parkinson's disease (PD) psychosis to the psychosis-like symptoms associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The initial clues indicating that serotonergic hallucinogens have effects on glutamate (Glu) release appeared around the time that it was recognized that selective 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists are not highly effective antipsychotic drugs in patients with schizophrenia. First, discoveries linking the glutamatergic system and hallucinogens will be discussed. The initial report showing that bath application of serotonin (5-HT) induces spontaneous (i.e., not evoked by electrical stimulation) excitatory postsynaptic potentials/currents (EPSPs/EPSCs) in prefrontal cortical and neocortical layer V (L5) pyramidal neurons in rat brain slice preparations was published in 1997. The basic pharmacological observations were that these spontaneous 5-HT-induced EPSPs/EPSCs were potently blocked by 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists at concentrations that were consistent with their K i values for the 5-HT 2A receptor, but were not affected by 5-HT 1A or 5-HT 3 /5-HT 4 receptor antagonists. The other basic pharmacological finding was that the broad spectrum presynaptic metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor agonist (1S,3S)-ACPD also suppressed the frequency of the 5-HT-induced EPSPs/EPSCs. Previously, inhibitory EPSPs were observed in piriform cortical and hippocampal neurons due to excitation of 5-HT 2A receptors on GABAergic interneurons. However, the 5-HT-induced synaptic currents in prefrontal and neocortical pyramidal cells were (1) potently and completely blocked by the AMPA receptor antagonist LY293558; (2) only minimally (<15%) suppressed by the GABA A receptor antagonist bicuculline; (3) completely suppressed by the fast sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX); (4) completely suppressed by perfusing the slice with an artificial cerebrospinal fluid solution containing no added calcium ("0" calcium) and high magnesium; and (5) mimicked by iontophoretic application of 5-HT in layers I and Va in a distribution consistent with stimulation of the apical dendrite but not the basilar dendrites. Furthermore, the firing of pyramidal neurons in response to bath applied 5-HT could not be detected even after exhaustive searches, unlike the ready identification of firing interneurons in piriform cortical slices. Taken together, these observations suggested a model where 5-HT, via activation of 5-HT 2A receptors, releases Glu from glutamatergic afferents terminating in the layer I and Va dendritic field of L5 pyramidal cells. Subsequently, studies that will be described below suggested that the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei are at least one of the sources providing the glutamatergic afferents. Thus, these 5-HT-induced EPSCPs/EPSPs are a novel form of feedforward excitation of glutamatergic afferents to the principle output neurons of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and neocortex. Another model paradigm for observing Glu release induced by serotonergic hallucinogens via 5-HT 2A receptor activation in PFC slices was subsequently identified. After applying a serotonergic hallucinogen such as LSD (10 nM) or DOI (3 lM) to a prefrontal cortical slice for 10 min, focal electrical stimulation of the slice in the middle of the cortex at approximately 1 Hz results in an early fast EPSC followed by an UP state and recurrent network activity. More cumbersome protocols to induce what was originally described as "late EPSCs" involved identifying stimulation sites in the white matter below cortical layer VI where stimulation at approximately 0.1 Hz induced these late EPSCs/EPSPs or recurrent network activity during the washout of 5-HT. Subsequent application of a serotonergic hallucinogen for approximately 10 min would then induce a long-lasting (up to several hours) appearance of late EPSCs or recurrent network activity after low-frequency 0.1 Hz stimulation of the white matter. The fact that washout of 5-HT from the slice is required to observe this form of recurrent network activity highlights the likelihood that a primary but relatively brief effect of 5-HT in the PFC is to inhibit Glu release, probably via some combination of effects on 5-HT 1A , 5-HT 1B , and 5-HT 1F receptors (Fig.). By contrast, bath application of 5-HT appears to result in a more sustained activation of 5-HT 2A receptors. Bath applications of serotonergic hallucinogens such as LSD and DOI, which potently bind to and activate 5-HT 2A receptors, together with focal electrical stimulation, combine to produce late synaptic currents or Glu "spillover", which can otherwise be described as excitatory feedforward and feedback recurrent network activity. The 5-HT-induced EPSCs and the recurrent network activity induced by the combination of DOI and focal low-frequency electrical stimulation are suppressed by a range of neurotransmitter receptors that are known to inhibit presynaptic Glu release (Tableand

THALAMOCORTICAL AXONS

Fig.Model of extrinsic (thalamus and/or claustrum) and intrinsic (medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and neocortex) afferents to the apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal cells that release glutamate (Glu) in response to activation of 5-HT 2A , a 1A/1B adrenergic, mGlu 5 , OX 2 , NK 3 or a 4 b 2 nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors (shown in green). A variety of presynaptic receptors suppress the 5-HT 2A receptor-induced Glu release including mGlu 2 , mGlu 4 , mGlu 8 , l-opioid, adenosine A 1 , dopamine D 1 and D 5 , b 2 -adrenergic, and 5-HT 1 receptors. The Glu released in response to 5-HT 2A activation activates AMPA receptors on the layer 5 pyramidal neurons. To date, the most convincing evidence suggests that the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei are the primary sources of the afferent glutamatergic axons that terminate on layers I and Va of the PFC and neocortex. The inset diagram shows that these experiments were performed under in vitro conditions using slices of the rat brain containing the anterior cingulate and prelimbic regions of the mPFC that mGlu autoreceptors played an important role in modulating the Glu release induced by 5-HT 2A receptor activation). An autoreceptor role for the mGlu 2 receptor was initially suggested based on the fact that the mGlu 2/3 receptor orthosteric agonists LY354740 and LY379268 could potently suppress 5-HT-induced EPSCs and DOI-induced Glu spillover, whereas the mGlu 2/3 receptor antagonist LY341495 enhanced EPSC frequency. LY354740 was approximately threefold more potent in suppressing 5-HT-induced EPSCs and DOI-induced Glu spillover compared to the early evoked EPSP; importantly, the direct effects on LY354740 on membrane potential were minimal, and LY354740 failed to alter the inward currents induced by bath application of AMPA following perfusion of the slice with TTX to block fast sodium channels. Furthermore, mGlu 2/3 receptor binding sites in layers I and Va of the PFC appeared to overlap with the laminar distribution of 5-HT 2A receptor binding sites. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that midline thalamic lesions caused a *20% reduction in the density of mGlu 2/3 receptors (measured with [ 3 H] LY354740) in PFC layers I and Va, likely a physiologically significant amount given that most [ 3 H]LY354740 binding sites were subsequently suggested to be mGlu 3 receptors). An even more definitive identification of a role for mGlu 2 receptors in mediating these effects was provided by experiments demonstrating that selective mGlu 2 receptor positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) suppressed 5-HT-induced EPSCs in the rat PFC). These effects have also been replicated in other laboratories and with additional selective mGlu 2/3 receptor agonists. Evidence for the behavioral salience of these functional 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 receptor interactions will be described below. Thus, the mGlu 2 receptor appears to function as an autoreceptor on glutamatergic terminals releasing Glu (induced by 5-HT 2A receptor activation) from afferents reaching the layer I and Va dendritic field of L5 pyramidal cells in the PFC and neocortex. Agonists of several other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that generally had inhibitory effects on neurotransmitter release or hyperpolarizing electrophysiological effects (G i/o -coupled receptors) were also found to suppress the spontaneous 5-HT-or DOI-induced EPSCs (Tableand Fig.). This included two other mGlu receptors (mGlu 4 and mGlu 8 ) that were also well known to decrease Glu release. The adenosine A 1 receptor, another well-known heteroreceptor that decreases Glu release, was also found to suppress spontaneous 5-HT-induced EPSCs and the feedforward and feedback Glu release induced by serotonergic hallucinogens and electrical stimulation. Finally, agonists for the l-opioid receptor, a G i/o -coupled GPCR with enrichment in PFC layers I and Va, were also found to suppress 5-HT-induced EPSCs. Thalamic lesions that decreased mGlu 2/3 receptor binding sites by *20% also reduced l-opioid receptor binding sites by *40%, suggesting that the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei are a potential source for the 5-HT-induced EPSCs. These studies are all consistent with the known localization of mGlu 2 , mGlu 4 , adenosine A 1 , and l-opioid receptors in a potential thalamic source of afferents to cortical layers I and V, namely the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei. Thus, converging lines of evidence further suggest a model where 5-HT 2A receptor activation and a range of G i/o -coupled GPCRs have countervailing effects Glu release from at least one pool of subcortical terminals reaching the apical dendritic field of L5 pyramidal cells throughout the PFC and neocortex (Tableand Fig.). In addition to the suppression of hallucinogen-induced Glu overflow induced by a number of G i/o -coupled GPCRs, several G s -coupled receptors appear to have similar effects on hallucinogen-induced recurrent network activity (Tableand Fig.). This effect has been well characterized for the D 1-like class of dopamine receptors (D 1 /D 5 ), which are coupled to G s . The ability of the D 1 /D 5 partial agonist SKF38393 to suppress DOI-induced late EPSCs was blocked by the dopamine D 1 /D 5 receptor antagonist SCH23390 but not the dopamine D 2 receptor antagonist raclopride. In contrast, the dopamine D 2 receptor agonist quinpirole failed to suppress DOI-induced recurrent network activity. The critical role played by Glu spillover in the effect of SKF38393 is indicated by mechanistic experiments linking its suppressant effect to the known ability of the G s pathway to upregulate the excitatory amino acid transporter 3 (EAAT3). Extending the effects observed to levels downstream from receptors, application of the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin, or the phosphodiesterase-resistant cAMP analogue 8-Br-cAMP suppressed DOI-induced recurrent network activity. The modulatory effects of forskolin and 8-Br-cAMP on DOI-induced recurrent network activity occurred in the absence of effects on fast early EPSCs. A cortical versus thalamic site of action for the D 1 /D 5 ligands is consistent with the known cortical versus thalamic localization of these receptors. Both postsynaptic and presynaptic effects relative to L5 pyramidal cells are supported by a range of known mechanisms for dopamine D 1 /D 5 receptors. Preliminary experiments have also suggested that b 2 -adrenergic receptor stimulation by epinephrine or clenbuterol can also selectively suppress DOI-induced recurrent network activity (GJ. The preferential localization of b 2 -adrenergic receptors to the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei compared to the preferential localization of b 1 -adrenergic receptors in the PFC and neocortex, as well as the known physiological effects of b 2 -adrenergic receptor function in one of the midline thalamic nuclei, is also consistent with a role of thalamic inputs in DOI-induced Glu release in the mPFC). Thus, suppression of DOI-induced Glu release by D 1 /D 5 receptor agonists and b 2 -adrenergic receptor agonists could support a model for intracortical circuitry or thalamocortical circuitry or a model combining both types of afferents onto cortical L5 pyramidal cells. Similar to the effect of 5-HT via 5-HT 2A receptors, activation of a number of G q/11 -coupled GPCRs appears to induce feedforward Glu release onto L5 pyramidal cells in the PFC and/or neocortex (Tableand Fig.). Where tested, common features for spontaneous neurotransmitter-induced EPSCs/EPSPCs included dependence on fast sodium channels (i.e., suppression by TTX) and AMPA receptors (i.e., suppression by LY293558), and suppression by a l-opioid receptor agonist (DAMGO). Thus, norepinephrine (NE), (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG), hypocretin-2, and senktide all induce EPSCs/EPSPs via activation of a 1 adrenergic, mGlu 5 , orexin 2 (OX 2 ), and NK 3 receptors, respectively). The NE-induced spontaneous EPSCs are especially interesting given the existence of significant similarities between a 1 -adrenoceptors (especially the a 1B subtype) and 5-HT 2A receptors with respect to regional brain distribution, laminar cortical protein distribution, and laminar cortical mRNA distribution, in addition to a range of physiological and behavioral effects with salient medial PFC (mPFC) involvement as discussed elsewhere) and later in this chapter. Expression of a 1 -adrenoceptors in glutamatergic axons and terminals in the mPFC, including colocalization with vesicular glutamate transporter 1 and 2 (VGluT1 and VGluT2), are consistent with cells of origin in the PFC and midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei, respectively. When compared to the quite modest and more controversial localization of TableNeurotransmitters that induce EPSCs/EPSPs via a feedforward mechanism 5-HT 2A receptors to presynaptic neuronal compartments (primarily monoaminergic axons and varicosities) determined using well-known antibodies, the fact that the majority of a 1 -adrenoceptors in the PFC, ventral tegmental area, and nucleus accumbens are expressed by unmyelinated axons and axon terminals rather than having a postsynaptic localization raises interesting questions about the reliability of monoamine antibody epitopes required to detect labeling in presynaptic terminals and axons. In recordings from L5 pyramidal cells in rat brain slices, the type I mGlu receptor agonist DHPG induces an increase in spontaneous EPSCs that can be blocked by a selective negative allosteric modulator (NAM) of the mGlu 5 receptor. The pharmacology of DHPG-induced EPSCs is similar to 5-HT-induced EPSCs with respect to their suppression and enhancement by mGlu 2/3 receptor agonists and antagonists, respectively. In addition, a l-opioid receptor agonist, as well as a AMPA/GluK5 receptor antagonist (LY293558), suppressed DHPG-induced EPSCs. DHPG was not observed to have consistent effects on membrane depolarization after blockade of sodium channels and impulse flow with TTX. Although mGlu 5 receptors are predominantly expressed at postsynaptic sites in the neocortex, according to light and electron microscopic studies, a minority of mGlu 5 receptors are localized in presynaptic axon terminals. The localization of mGlu 5 receptor mRNA and protein is consistent with a presynaptic role where the cells of origin might arise from either the thalamus, the PFC and neocortex, or both. Strong evidence for a presynaptic effect of orexin-B involving OX 2 receptors will be discussed shortly, including data indicating that the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei are a potential source for these afferents. The pharmacology of the senktide-induced increase in EPSC frequency has not been defined beyond blockade by NK 3 receptor antagonists. Immunohistochemical, receptor autoradiography, and mRNA studies in rats appear to suggest that NK 3 is largely a cortical receptor expressed in mid-cortical layers (layers IV and V) throughout the PFC and neocortex). However, one study suggests that NK 3 receptors are present in the midline thalamic nuclei in primates. Thus, agonists for a number of G q/11 -coupled receptors known to be expressed in the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei appear to induce an increase in the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs similar to the effect of 5-HT on L5 pyramidal neurons in the PFC and neocortex. In addition to the neurotransmitters discussed above, acetylcholine (ACh) and nicotine were also found to induce EPSCs/EPSPs through activation of a 4 b 2 nicotinic receptors on thalamic afferents to L5 pyramidal cells. Evidence also exists that ACh may increase the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs, although the pharmacology of this effect has not been defined beyond the involvement of muscarinic M 1 receptor activation. The potential for a G i/o -coupled muscarinic receptor to suppress 5-HT-, NE-, orexin-B-, and DHPG-induced EPSCs should be explored as well.

NEUROCIRCUITRY: THALAMOCORTICAL VERSUS CORTICAL/CLAUSTRUM PROJECTIONS TO MPFC LAYER V NEURONS

At least a majority of the 5-HT-induced EPSCs, if not all, appear to originate from subcortical sources. The frequency of 5-HT-induced EPSCs in rat PFC slices was reduced 61-67% by fiber-sparing chemical or radiofrequency lesions of the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei that were made 12-18 or 6-14 days, respectively, before the intracellular recordings from L5 pyramidal cells). As described above, these thalamic lesions also reduced the expression of mGlu 2 and l-opioid receptors, suggesting that about 40% of the mGlu 2 and l-opioid receptors in the PFC are located on thalamic afferents presynaptic to the L5 pyramidal cells. The fact that these lesions greatly reduce the frequency of 5-HT-induced EPSCs suggests an important functional link to thalamic terminals. Postsynaptic 5-HT 2A receptors present in layers I and Va of the mPFC were significantly upregulated (*114% of control levels) in response to the chemical fiber-sparing thalamic lesions. Because 5-HT 2A receptors are primarily localized postsynaptically on pyramidal cells and interneurons in the PFC and neocortex, an upregulation of postsynaptic 5-HT 2A receptors would likely conceal the fact that a relatively minor pool of presynaptic 5-HT 2A receptors was eliminated by the thalamic lesions. Less than 25% of the prefrontal cortical 5-HT 2A receptors are present on presynaptic sites on axons, and most of those 5-HT 2A receptors are thought to be present on the axons of monoaminergic neurons. This assessment, which was made using currently available antibodies, suggests that glutamatergic terminals and axons expressing 5-HT 2A receptors are relatively rare in the mPFC. A subsequent report confirmed that most of the 5-HT-induced EPSPs recorded in PFC slices appear to originate from axons and terminals of thalamic projections. Additional experiments suggested that 5-HT induces EPSCs by closing Kv1.2-containing potassium channels. Confirming previous reports that presynaptic a 4 b 2 nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors in mid-cortical layers originate from the thalamus, Lambe and colleagues reported that thalamic lesions reduced the frequency of nicotine-and ACh-induced spontaneous EPSCs by *80%. Thus, agonists for both the 5-HT 2A receptor and the a 4 b 2 nAChR induced an increase in spontaneous currents in the PFC via activation of afferents from the midline thalamus. Around this time, compelling converging evidence emerged suggesting that activation of orexin 2 (OX 2 ) receptors induced an increase in spontaneous EPSCs via activation of afferents from the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei. First, in recordings from layer V pyramidal cells, the hypocretin-2 peptide was found to induce spontaneous EPSCs without directly depolarizing the pyramidal cells. Hypocretin-2, an OX 2 receptor agonist, induced calcium transients in a small minority of spines (<10%) in the layer I and Va apical dendritic fields of the pyramidal cells. Similar calcium transients were not induced in basilar dendritic spines. Furthermore, these calcium transients were induced in spines generally in apposition to anterogradely labeled terminals originating from neurons in the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei. Midline thalamic lesions suppressed the hypocretin-induced EPSCs without affecting baseline EPSCs. TTX, l-opioid agonists, and an AMPA receptor antagonist all suppressed the spontaneous EPSCs and the calcium transients, similar to the effects observed previously for 5-HT 2A receptor activation. These findings with hypocretin-2 are also consistent with the hypothesis that 5-HT 2A receptor activation induces Glu release onto the apical dendritic field of L5 pyramidal neurons via thalamocortical afferents. The partial suppression (60-65%) of 5-HT-induced EPSCs in the mPFC by large thalamic lesions suggests that there is at least one additional source of afferents to the L5 pyramidal cells. The basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA) projects to the deep portion of layer I, layer II, and the entire width of layer V, making this amygdaloid nucleus another potential subcortical source for 5-HT-induced EPSCs. However, complete destruction of the BLA bilaterally did not alter the frequency of 5-HT-induced EPSCs, ruling out the amygdala as a feedforward afferent to the L5 pyramidal cells. Several cortical sources that could potentially mediate the EPSCs induced by 5-HT and serotonergic hallucinogens have also been proposed. Rodrigo Andrade and colleagues identified a subpopulation of neurons deep within the mPFC that are depolarized sufficiently by 5-HT 2A receptor activation to fire action potentials; these cells are a potential source of the 5-HT-induced EPSCs). This subpopulation of mPFC neurons needs to be defined in greater detail, especially with regard to the G i/o -coupled GPCRs that suppress 5-HT-induced EPSCs and the other G q/11 -coupled GPCRs that produce similar increases of spontaneous EPSC frequency. To date, the l-opioid receptor is the only GCPR known to modulate the activity of this population of deep cortical neurons. A more complete pharmacological characterization of these cells with respect to inhibitory effects of mGlu 2 , mGlu 4 , mGlu 8 , adenosine A 1 , dopamine D 1/5 , b 2 -adrenergic and 5-HT 1 receptors and the excitatory effects of OX 2 , a 1 -adrenergic, mGlu 5 , a 4 b 2 -nicotinic, and NK 3 receptors is necessary before concluding that these cells represent a cortical source of the afferents activated by 5-HT 2A receptors. Another cortical source for 5-HT-induced EPSCs may be L5 pyramidal neurons that send callosal and commissural projections to the contralateral cortex, which are excited by 5-HT. Unfortunately, the pharmacology of these cells with respect to inhibition and excitation by the range of GPCRs described above has not been explored. One report, which analyzed 5-HT-induced EPSCs recorded from transgenic mice that were rescued from a constitutive knockout of 5-HT 2A receptors throughout the CNS, has suggested that 5-HT-induced EPSCs arise primarily from neocortical afferents intrinsic to the cerebral cortical mantle). However, interpretation of the htr2a gene rescue experiment for the thalamus appears to have been compromised by the use of a promoter that is weakly expressed in the midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei compared to a robust expression in the primary sensory thalamic nuclei. Further, the htr2a gene rescue directed at the mPFC also included the claustrum as an area being rescued. Because the claustrum, which sends afferents to layers I and V of the mPFC and neocortex, is also a potential source of the afferents mediating the 5-HT-induced EPSCs, it is premature to conclude that the spontaneous 5-HT-induced EPSCs are mediated by cortical afferents based solely on this experiment. Clearly, further work is necessary to understand whether circuitry between the mPFC and claustrum plays a role in mediating the effects of hallucinogenic drugs and 5-HT 2A receptor activation. Additional studies directed at understanding whether hippocampal afferents to the mPFC could be involved are also warranted. Further studies using different technologies to confirm or refute the presence of 5-HT 2A receptors in midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei, such as optogenetic recordings with gene-based targeting strategies, could clarify models of interactions between hallucinogenic drugs and Glu in the PFC). Nevertheless, as indicated by both thalamic lesions and the combined two-photon imaging and anterograde labeling of thalamic projections arising from the intralaminar and thalamic nuclei, these "non-specific" thalamic nuclei clearly seem to serve as an important substrate for the spontaneous EPSCs induced by 5-HT and hypocretin-2. Additional experiments are required to understand the potential role of claustral and/or neocortical afferents to L5 pyramidal cells. 1 From 5-HT 2A Receptor-Induced EPSCs and Recurrent Neuronal Activity to Salient Behavioral Effects Induced by 5-HT 2A Receptor Activation

HEAD-TWITCH RESPONSE

Given that a wide range of neurotransmitter systems appear to have modulatory effects on Glu released from subcortical terminals and/or intrinsic cortical afferents onto the apical dendrites of L5 pyramidal cells, salient behavioral effects would be expected to arise from these interactions since L5 pyramidal cells are the principal source of output from the neocortex to subcortical regions. A range of behaviors induced by systemic administration of hallucinogenic drugs, including a relatively simple behavioral response known as head twitches or head shakes, appear to be modulated by the same neurotransmitter relationships outlined previously for subcortical glutamatergic afferents to L5 pyramidal cells. According to a report published almost 20 years ago, local infusion of DOI into the prelimbic region of the mPFC induces a head-twitch response (HTR) that is blocked by systemic administration of 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists but not by a selective 5-HT 2C receptor antagonist, suggesting that hallucinogen-induced head twitches are mediated by activation of 5-HT 2A receptors in the mPFC. Given that a range of antidepressant drugs, as well as typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs, suppress the HTR induced by DOI, 5-HTP, and quipazine, drugs acting on mGlu 2 receptors were tested for effects on the DOI-induced HTR. Several mGlu 2/3 receptor agonists (e.g., LY354740 and LY379268) and mGlu 2 receptor PAMs (e.g., BINA and CBiPES) were found to suppress DOI-induced head twitches, whereas the mGlu 2/3 receptor antagonist LY341495 potently enhances the frequency of DOI-induced head twitches (Fig.), consistent with an interaction between 5-HT 2A receptors and mGlu 2 autoreceptors on afferents to the mPFC). These observations prompted efforts to determine whether a range of neurotransmitter receptor agonists, PAMs, or antagonists that modulate 5-HT-induced EPSCs can also alter the HTR induced by serotonergic hallucinogens. As expected, l-opioid agonists, adenosine A 1 receptor agonists, AMPA receptor antagonists, mGlu 4 receptor PAMs, mGlu 5 receptor negative allosteric modulators (NAMs; GJ Marek, unpublished observations), NK 3 receptor antagonists (GJ Marek, unpublished observations), a 1adrenergic receptor antagonists, OX 2 receptor antagonists (GJ Marek, unpublished observations), and b 2 -adrenergic receptor agonists (GJ Marek, unpublished observations) have been found to suppress head twitches induced by serotonergic hallucinogens (Fig.). Thus, impressive coherence exists between a range of targets modulating Glu release due to 5-HT 2A receptor activation and the ability of ligands acting at those targets to modulate the hallucinogen-induced HTR in rodents (Table). In contrast to expectations from the molecular targets described above, dopamine D 1/5 receptor antagonists were found to suppress, rather than enhance, DOI-induced head twitches. However, the potency and efficacy of the dopamine D 1 receptor antagonists in suppressing DOI-induced head twitches was equally correlated with affinity for 5-HT 2A receptors and dopamine D 1 receptors, creating uncertainty regarding which mechanism was responsible for the behavioral action. Nicotine is another ligand that has been tested and found to have effects opposite to those expected based on its ability to increase spontaneous EPSCs. Nicotine suppresses DOI-induced head twitches). However, since hallucinogen-induced head twitches in rodents have been reported to have an inverted-U-shaped dose response relationship, it is not clear whether the apparent suppressant effect of nicotine on DOI-induced head twitches reflects a confounding effect of the position on the dose-response curve being studied. Further pharmacological characterization with respect to Glu suggests that low doses of DOI (0.315-0.63 mg/kg) and the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.2 mg) have synergistic effects on horizontal locomotor activity in rats when administered in combination. Taken together, these overall findings are consistent with the hypothesis that modulation of Glu spillover (arising from subcortical afferents and/or intrinsic cortical afferents and directed onto the apical dendritic field of L5 pyramidal cells in the mPFC) is a key substrate for modulating the HTR in mice and rats, a well-known behavioral effect of serotonergic hallucinogens.

GLUTAMATERGIC AXONS

Fig.Model of glutamatergic afferents to the apical dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal cells that release glutamate (Glu) in response to serotonergic hallucinogens such as LSD, DOI, and psilocybin (shown in green), which also induce head twitches in rats and mice. A variety of presynaptic receptors can suppress the hallucinogen-induced head twitches, including mGlu 2 , mGlu 4 , l-opioid, adenosine A 1 , b 2 -adrenergic, and 5-HT 1A receptors. All of these receptors suppress recurrent network activity (late EPSPs) induced by stimulation of 5-HT 2A receptors on presumed thalamocortical afferents. Most of these agonists only partially suppress DOI-induced head shakes. The Glu released in response to 5-HT 2A receptor activation then stimulates AMPA receptors on the layer 5 pyramidal neurons. The inset picture on the top right shows a Sprague-Dawley rat. The inset illustration on the bottom right shows a coronal section through the brain with shading indicating the location of the prelimbic (PrL) region of the medial prefrontal cortex. As shown by David Willins and Herb Meltzer in 1997, infusion of DOI into the PrL region induces head-twitch behavior. Abbreviations: Cg1 cingulate area 1; IL infralimbic cortex; M2 premotor cortex Beyond their utility as an in vivo model for modulation of mPFC 5-HT 2A receptor activity, DOI-induced head twitches in rodents have been used as a relatively promiscuous screening model for potential antipsychotic and/or antidepressant drugs. The DOI-induced HTR has also been suggested to be a model for tic disorders, such as Tourette's syndrome. However, the actual physiological role for the HTR, observed to occur at a relatively low spontaneous rate in all vertebrate species outside of most primates and humans, remains to be delineated.

MOTORIC IMPULSIVITY STUDIED USING THE 5-CSRTT

The five-choice serial reaction time test (5-CSRTT) is another intriguing behavioral paradigm that has been studied with respect to activation of 5-HT 2A receptors in the PFC. A particular type of impulsivity, motoric impulsivity or action impulsivity, is assessed using the 5-CSRTT. Important for our discussion, systemic administration of 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists such as ketanserin reduces motoric impulsivity (especially premature responses) in 5-CSRTT studies, but does not alter another form of impulsivity related to delayed reward presentation. Anatomical validation of this behavior was demonstrated by the finding that infusion of selective 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists such as M100907 into the mPFC suppressed anticipatory responding induced by administration of a NMDA receptor. As expected based on in vitro electrophysiological recordings from L5 pyramidal cells and studies of DOI-induced head twitches, pretreatment with the mGlu 2/3 receptor agonist LY379268 blocks impulsivity or over responding induced by DOI in rats performing the 5-CSRTT. Furthermore, intra-mPFC infusions of DOI were shown to increase impulsive responding in the 5-CSRTT whereas the mGlu 2/3 receptor agonist LY379268 suppressed this effect of DOI. Also, as expected from electrophysiological and HTR studies, the a 1 -adrenergic receptor antagonist prazosin suppressed DOI-induced premature responses on the 5-CSRTT, in contrast to the lack of effect for an a 2 -adrenergic receptor antagonist. Both consistent and contradictory behavioral evidence for a modulatory effect of dopamine D 1/5 receptors has been found. For example, the dopamine D 1/5 receptor agonist SKF38393 enhanced the accuracy of attentional performance under low baseline conditions; a dopamine D 1 receptor antagonist blocked the effect of SKF38393. Furthermore, systemic administration of the dopamine D 1/5 receptor agonist SKF38393 improved choice accuracy in the 5-CSRTT, whereas the 5-HT 2A antagonist ketanserin suppressed premature responding when administered systemically or directly into the mPFC. These findings were extended to the striatum where infusions of a dopamine D 1 receptor agonist improved accuracy in the 5-CSRTT; these effects were also blocked by a dopamine D 1 receptor antagonist. In contrast to the previous reports, other experiments suggested that the dopamine D 1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 suppressed the effect of DOI on premature responding. Hence, although further pharmacological characterization with a range of other GPCR agonists and antagonists is necessary, initial experiments have shown that the 5-CSRTT has intriguing consistencies with the electrophysiology of L5 pyramidal cells and the DOI-induced HTR.

DRL 72-S OPERANT BEHAVIOR: A BEHAVIORAL SCREEN FOR ANTIDEPRESSANT-LIKE EFFECTS

Operant lever pressing by rats under a differential-reinforcement-of-low rate 72-sec (DRL-72 s) schedule of reinforcement is another behavioral paradigm involving PFC-striatal-thalamic-amygdala loops with a critical relationship to motoric impulsive behavior. Antidepressant drugs as a class appear to bias the responding of rats operating under DRL 72-s schedules away from impulsive responding (e.g., failing to wait 72-s from the last response to lever press in order to obtain water or food) and increase the probability that responding will occur at time durations matching reinforcement contingencies. Not surprisingly, selective blockade of 5-HT 2A receptors induces cohesive antidepressant-like rightward shifts in the inter-response time (IRT) distribution (along with increases in the reinforcement rate and decreases in the response rate) alone or when added to the SSRI fluoxetine, the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine, and the monoamine oxidase inhibitor tranylcypromine. Similar rightward shifts in IRT distributions were also induced by the selective 5-HT 2A receptor antagonist M100907 following administration of the channel blocking NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. As expected from the relationships between studies of L5 pyramidal cell electrophysiological responses and the DOI-induced HTR, suppressing Glu release with a mGlu 2 receptor PAM or an adenosine A 1 receptor agonist also resulted in antidepressant-like effects in rats responding under DRL 72-s schedules. More recently, the blockade of OX 2 receptors was reported to result in antidepressant effects on DRL 72-s behavior. Interestingly, several decades ago, b 2 -adrenergic receptor agonists such as clenbuterol were demonstrated to produce antidepressant-like activity on DRL 72-s behavior in rats, effects that appear consistent with preliminary clinical observations and also match their profile of effects on rat PFC slice electrophysiology and the HTR induced by DOI. While some receptor systems discussed above have not yet been tested (mGlu 4 receptor agonists, dopamine D 1/5 receptor agonists, and NK 3 receptor antagonists), l-opioid receptor agonists and a 1 -adrenergic receptor antagonists do not appear to induce antidepressant-like effects on DRL 72-s behavior. The lack of antidepressant-like effects on DRL behavior for some agents known to suppress Glu release onto L5 pyramidal cells is not surprising given the likelihood that actions on l-opioid receptors or a 1 -adrenergic receptors elsewhere in prefrontal cortical-striatal-thalamic-amygdaloid circuits may counter their modulatory effects on the thalamic and non-thalamic glutamatergic afferents to cortical L5 pyramidal cells. What is remarkable is that so many of the mechanisms that suppress 5-HT 2A receptor-induced Glu release onto L5 pyramidal cells possess either preclinical antidepressant-like (e.g., DRL 72-s behavior) or antipsychotic-like behavioral effects (e.g., blockade of DOI-induced HTR and/or NMDA receptor antagonist-induced hyperactivity; Table).

HETEROCOMPLEXES OR FUNCTIONAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN 5-HT 2A AND MGLU 2 RECEPTORS?

In vitro colocalization demonstrated using BRET and FRET technology and a wealth of both in vitro and in vivo functional interactions has led to the suggestion that a heterocomplex is formed between 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 receptors in L5 pyramidal cells in the PFC and neocortex. The in vitro localization of apparent complexes between 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 receptors in transfected cell lines has been confirmed by others). However, functional evidence for heterocomplexes between 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 receptors could not be confirmed in in vitro experiments. Thus, the presence of 5-HT 2A receptors did not appreciably appear to affect the binding of mGlu 2 radioligands and vice versa. Furthermore, it is not clear that heteromeric receptors are necessary for the occurrence of functional interactions such as those that exist between 5-HT 2A receptors and mGlu 2 receptors. The only other G q -coupled GPCR that may be closely localized with mGlu 2 receptors in heteromeric receptor complexes is the mGlu 5 receptor), but such relationships are not known to exist for other receptors that are capable of inducing EPSCs, such as a 1 -adrenergic, OX 2 , or NK 3 receptors. Similarly, heteromeric relationships have not been identified between 5-HT 2A receptors and a range of receptors that can suppress 5-HT-induced EPSCs (Table). In contrast, Doumazane and colleagues did produce evidence for the existence of heterodimers between mGlu 2 and mGlu 4 receptors in overexpressing cell lines. The model for heterocomplexes between 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 receptors places them both on L5 pyramidal cells and ignores the data suggesting that only a very minor subpopulation of 5-HT 2A receptors are expressed presynaptically, as well as the overwhelming evidence for a predominantly presynaptic function of the mGlu 2 receptor. Although it has been suggested that clozapine downregulates both mGlu 2 and 5-HT 2A receptors), this finding was not observed by others. Furthermore, dissociations between mGlu 2 receptor distribution and 5-HT 2A receptor distribution appear to occur following sub-chronic antidepressant treatment in rodents or in depressed patients. Previous evidence for a dissociation between mGlu 2 and 5-HT 2A receptor distribution was derived from studies of midline thalamic lesions, where a *40% reduction of the density of presumed presynaptic mGlu 2 receptors occurred simultaneously with an increase in the density of postsynaptic 5-HT 2A receptors. In contrast to these previous lines of evidence, the in vitro and in vivo evidence that mutating three residues from the intracellular portion of the mGlu 2 receptor suppresses 5-HT 2A receptor activity strongly supports the existence of 5-HT 2A -and mGlu 2 -containing heterocomplexes). Thus, it remains to be completely understood which of the following three hypotheses explains the in vivo interactions between 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 ligands: (1) only functional relationships occur between 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 receptors; (2) only heterocomplexes containing 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 receptors mediate the interactions; or (3) both independently acting 5-HT 2A and mGlu 2 receptors and 5-HT 2A -mGlu 2 heterocomplexes are involved. As an aside with regard to receptor heteromers involving 5-HT 2A receptors, heterocomplexes between 5-HT 2A and cannabinoid CB 1 receptors appear to be involved in D 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced amnesia but not the locomotor, hypothermic, anxiogenic, or antinociceptive effects. These 5-HT 2A and CB 1 heteromers appear to share some similarity to 5-HT 2A -mGlu 2 heterocomplexes since the 5-HT 2A receptor is primarily a postsynaptic receptor while mGlu 2 and CB 1 receptors are primarily presynaptic receptors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN

Glutamate and 5-HT 2A Receptors in the mPFC Based initially on insights regarding the interaction of hallucinogenic drugs with the 5-HT 2A receptor, several 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists were discovered, characterized, and tested in patients with schizophrenia. Clinical results with drugs lacking selectivity at 5-HT 2A versus 5-HT 2C receptors (e.g., ritanserin) or with drugs having at least 30-fold selectivity for 5-HT 2A versus 5-HT 2C receptors (e.g., M100907, SR46349B, pimavanserin, and CYR-101) have been disappointing because none of the drugs exerted antipsychotic effects approaching those of either firstor secondgeneration antipsychotic drugs when tested as monotherapy for schizophrenia. At best, these drugs exert statistically significant but clinically disappointing intermediate efficacy between haloperidol and placebo. Even when added to the atypical antipsychotic risperidone, the positive therapeutic effects of the 5-HT 2A inverse agonist pimavanserin were limited to those subjects on a very low (2 mg) daily dose of risperidone). More recent results over the last 7 years with pimavanserin raise some hope that selective 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists or inverse agonists may provide clinically relevant therapeutic effects for psychosis in patients with neurodegenerative disease. Pimavanserin is only the second potent 5-HT 2A receptors antagonist or inverse agonist that has been shown to improve Parkinson's disease (PD) psychosis. The other antipsychotic exerting both demonstrable antipsychotic efficacy and lacking clinically significant extrapyramidal side effects is clozapine. In April 2016, the FDA approved pimavanserin for psychosis associated with PD. With respect to the disease itself, multiple studies involving both postmortem data and in vivo PET imaging have reported increased levels of 5-HT 2A receptor expression in patients with Parkinson's disease. Changes in brain mGlu 2 receptor expression in Parkinson's disease have yet to be examined in relationship to questions of functional interactions with 5-HT 2A receptors or the existence of an actual heterocomplex between these two receptors. Nevertheless, the effect of pimavanserin on Parkinson's disease does suggest that relatively selective 5-HT 2A blockade can suppress the delusions and hallucinations characteristic of this neurodegenerative disorder. A phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial addressing the effects of pimavanserin on psychosis associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) was recently completed and reportedly showed positive results (www.ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT02035553). Thus, studies in psychosis associated with either PD or AD have brought to realization predictions made years ago by the late psychiatrist Dr. Daniel X. Freedman that the study of LSD would result in advances for the treatment of major mental illnesses. The pimavanserin AD study is intriguing given that (1) down-regulation of 5-HT 2A receptors occurs in AD before other neurotransmitter receptors are altered); (2) pharmacogenetic studies have revealed a potential association between certain 5-HT 2A receptor gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and psychosis in AD patients; and (3) shared pathophysiology exists between AD and PD such as early degeneration of cholinergic and serotonergic neurons, amyloidosis, and the presence of Lewy bodies. The recent studies showing that a 5-HT 2A receptor inverse agonist can be used to treat psychosis associated with either PD or AD raises the provocative question of whether mGlu 2/3 receptor agonists might have a larger effect size in PD or AD psychosis compared with the apparent efficacy of the mGlu 2/3 agonist LY2140023 (pomaglumetad methionil) in only a modest subset of patients with schizophrenia. Given that clinical lore and experience in methadone maintenance clinics indicates that l-opioid receptor agonists may possess clinical antipsychotic activity), the work with 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists in psychosis associated with neurodegenerative diseases suggests that testing compounds acting at novel molecular targets for antipsychotic activity should not be solely limited to patients with schizophrenia. As described earlier, a number of drugs targeting receptor sites that modulate 5-HT-induced EPSCs in rat mPFC slice preparations also exert antidepressant-like effects in the DRL 72-s schedule. This includes selective 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists such as M100907, ketanserin, and pipamperone. 5-HT 2A receptor antagonists also enhance the therapeutic effects of SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. These findings are consistent with the results of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies suggesting antidepressant efficacy for drugs such as trazodone, nefazodone, mirtazapine, and mianserin, which block 5-HT 2A receptors. Some, but not all, studies examining augmentation with mirtazapine or mianserin have demonstrated improved antidepressant efficacy. Furthermore, these preclinical data are also consistent with a metaanalysis confirming that adding atypical antipsychotic drugs, which block 5-HT 2A receptors among a range of pharmacological effects, onto ongoing treatment with SSRIs or SNRIs improves the clinical antidepressant action. Previous open-label and controlled studies suggested that the b 2 -adrenergic receptor agonist salbutamol might have antidepressant effects in depressed patients. A mGlu 2 receptor PAM is the only novel mechanism suppressing 5-HT-induced EPSCs that has also been tested in a clinical study. The results of a single trial investigating the effect of adjunctive treatment with a mGlu 2 receptor PAM in combination with SSRIs/SNRIs largely appeared negative with a numerical but not a significant advantage for the mGlu 2 receptor PAM over placebo. The primary limitation of this mGlu 2 PAM trial in major depressive disorder (MDD), which only showed a weak trend toward antidepressant efficacy, was uncertainty whether optimal doses and/or dosing schedules had been used. A number of open-label trials with buprenorphine, a l-opioid agonist, and j-opioid antagonist, in patients with MDD, including several involving patients with treatment-resistant depression, have suggested that this compound has antidepressant activity). These effects of buprenorphine are consistent with the fact that opiates had a long history of use in depressed patients prior to the development of other effective treatments. A selective OX 2 receptor antagonist (Min-202 or JNJ-42847922) is currently being developed by Minerva Neurosciences and Janssen as a treatment for insomnia and MDD. Preliminary reports from phase 1b studies with this OX 2 receptor antagonist in patients with MDD indicate that there were improvements in both sleep and mood, but these results await confirmation in phase 2 proof-of-concept trials. Thus, a number of compounds that block 5-HT 2A receptors or suppress the effects of hallucinogens in either in vitro brain slice preparations or in vivo HTR studies in rodents appear to possess at least some potential antidepressant efficacy in patients. A series of studies with the channel blocking NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine have raised the possibility that a unique pattern of results may have predictive utility for discovering drugs having positive effects in treatment refractory MDD or bipolar depression. In addition to having well-known pro-psychotic effect in subjects with schizophrenia, administration of subanesthetic doses of ketamine produces nearly immediate (90 min) but short-lived (up to approximately 2 weeks) antidepressant effects in subjects with treatment refractory MDD or bipolar depression. When brain slices are prepared from rats treated 24 h earlier with ketamine, an increase in spontaneous EPSCs is observed in recordings from L5 pyramidal cells. More remarkably, a single subanesthetic dose of ketamine (10 mg IP) induces the formation of new synaptic spines in the apical dendritic field of L5 pyramidal cells within 24 h. At the behavioral level, 24 h after ketamine administration antidepressant-like effects were observed in the forced swim test, the learned helplessness paradigm, and the novelty suppressed feeding test. At a mechanistic level, blockade of the mTOR pathway blocked these effects, which had been observed 24 h following an acute dose of ketamine. Deficits in synaptic electrophysiology, spine number, synaptic protein expression, and behavior induced by 21 days of chronic stress exposure are reversed by administration of a single dose of ketamine. These effects of ketamine are also consistent with its antidepressant-like activity in a number of depression models and screens for antidepressant drugs (Table). Ketamine has even been found to exert antidepressant-like effects on DRL 72-s behavior, although this effect appears to be limited to a period ranging from minutes to 2 h after dosing and is not apparent 24 h after a single acute administration (GJ Marek, unpublished observations). The evidence with ketamine is further strengthened by recent findings with lithium (Table). Lithium potentiates the electophysiological, synaptogenic, and antidepressant-like behavioral effects of ketamine in rats. These findings are of interest because lithium augmentation has long been a gold-standard treatment for treatment refractory MDD and bipolar disorder. The fact that the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine produces electrophysiological, synaptogenic, and antidepressant-like behavioral effects in preclinical rodent studies) that parallel its clinical antidepressant effects observed for MDD and bipolar depression, including treatment refractory cases, provides additional support for the use of this paradigm to discover novel antidepressants for treatment refractory patients. From a theoretical standpoint, the effects of rapidly acting putative antidepressants such as ketamine and scopolamine on synaptogenesis may point to a fundamental link between depressive symptoms and the loss of the neuropil observed in MDD patients in postmortem histopathology studies and inferred from the decrease in cortical thickness seen in neuroimaging and postmortem neuropathology studies.

CONCLUSIONS

After the discovery of LSD's potent psychotropic effects by Albert Hofmann in Basel, Switzerland in April 1943, serotonergic hallucinogens have inspired research goals ranging from curing major neuropsychiatric diseases to understanding consciousness. Understanding the common shared effects of hallucinogens such as LSD, mescaline, and psilocybin has directed modern neuroscience toward the PFC and neocortex, where some of the highest densities of 5-HT 2A receptors are found. At the cellular level, a significant literature has described the effects of hallucinogens and 5-HT 2A receptor activation on L5 pyramidal cells, which are the principal output cells of the PFC and neocortex. A range of monoaminergic, glutamatergic, purinergic, and peptide neurotransmitter receptor ligands suppress Glu release from putative thalamic afferents and from other sources (potentially including the PFC, neocortex, and claustrum) where the release is induced by activation of 5-HT 2A receptors, as inferred from intracellular and whole cell recordings of L5 pyramidal cells in the PFC. Most of these transmitter systems also suppress the HTR induced by serotonergic hallucinogens. Administration of agonists or antagonists for most of these transmitter systems also results in antidepressant-like and/or antipsychotic-like effects for salient behaviors mediated by the PFC. Positive results have been observed for a number, though not all, of these targets when evidence for antidepressant or antipsychotic effects has been evaluated clinically in patients. One important recent lesson in CNS drug development regarding testing for clinical antipsychotic effects is that the recent positive results for pimavanserin in PD psychosis demonstrate that negative or disappointing results in schizophrenia do not always rule out a potential antipsychotic action in patients with neurodegenerative disease. Finally, recent studies with ketamine, lithium, and scopolamine raise the possibility that studying unique electrophysiological, synaptogenic, and behavioral profiles may help to uncover new medications for treatment refractory MDD and bipolar depression. However, there still remain a plethora of outstanding questions at multiple levels of inquiry ranging from receptor-receptor interactions, post-receptor transduction pathways, and both micro-and macro-circuit involvements in a range of behaviors, emotions, thoughts, and in consciousness itself.

Study Details

Your Library