Interaction of psychoactive tryptamines with biogenic amine transporters and serotonin receptor subtypes
This study (2014) analyzed the interaction of 21 different tryptamines with specific neurotransmitter transporters and receptor subtypes implicated in psychedelic effects in rodent brains. The authors found that all substances were 5-HT2A agonists, but that SERT activity may play an important role for some of the compounds.
Authors
- Baumann, M. H.
- Blough, B. E.
- Decker, A. M.
Published
Abstract
Rationale: Synthetic hallucinogenic tryptamines, especially those originally described by Alexander Shulgin, continue to be abused in the USA. The range of subjective experiences produced by different tryptamines suggests that multiple neurochemical mechanisms are involved in their actions, in addition to the established role of agonist activity at serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptors.Objectives: This study evaluated the interaction of a series of synthetic tryptamines with biogenic amine neurotransmitter transporters and with serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes implicated in psychedelic effects.Methods: Neurotransmitter transporter activity was determined in rat brain synaptosomes. Receptor activity was determined using calcium mobilization and DiscoveRx PathHunter® assays in HEK293, Gα16-CHO, and CHOk1 cells transfected with human receptors.Results: Twenty-one tryptamines were analyzed in transporter uptake and release assays, and 5-HT2A, serotonin 1A (5-HT1A), and 5-HT2A β-arrestin functional assays. Eight of the compounds were found to have 5-HT-releasing activity. Thirteen compounds were found to be 5-HT uptake inhibitors or were inactive. All tryptamines were 5-HT2A agonists with a range of potencies and efficacies, but only a few compounds were 5-HT1A agonists. Most tryptamines recruited β-arrestin through 5-HT2A activation.Conclusions: All psychoactive tryptamines are 5-HT2A agonists, but 5-HT transporter (SERT) activity may contribute significantly to the pharmacology of certain compounds. The in vitro transporter data confirm structure-activity trends for releasers and uptake inhibitors whereby releasers tend to be structurally smaller compounds. Interestingly, two tertiary amines were found to be selective substrates at SERT, which dispels the notion that 5-HT-releasing activity is limited only to primary or secondary amines.
Research Summary of 'Interaction of psychoactive tryptamines with biogenic amine transporters and serotonin receptor subtypes'
Introduction
Synthetic hallucinogenic tryptamines — many first described by Alexander Shulgin — remain used recreationally and are chemically related to endogenous serotonin and classical psychedelics such as LSD and psilocybin. Prior work has established that agonism at the serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor is central to psychedelic effects, but not all 5-HT2A agonists produce hallucinations, and evidence for functional selectivity and involvement of other targets (for example SERT, 5-HT1A, 5-HT2C, trace amine and dopamine receptors) suggests multiple neurochemical pathways may shape subjective effects. Structure–activity observations have also suggested that some tryptamines may act at the serotonin transporter (SERT) either as uptake inhibitors or as transporter substrates that induce 5-HT release, analogous to the distinction between MDMA (a releaser) and LSD (a 5-HT2A agonist) in therapeutic contexts. Blough and colleagues set out to characterise a panel of 21 synthetic tryptamines across biogenic amine transporters (DAT, NET, SERT) and serotonin receptor subtypes implicated in psychedelic pharmacology (human 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A). The study aimed to determine which compounds act as SERT substrates (releasers) versus SERT uptake inhibitors, to profile 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A agonist activity including β-arrestin recruitment, and to relate these in vitro pharmacologies to structural features of the molecules.
Methods
The investigators evaluated 21 tryptamines in transporter assays using rat brain synaptosomes and in human receptor functional assays using transfected cell lines. Synaptosomes for dopamine transporter (DAT) assays were prepared from rat striatum; synaptosomes for norepinephrine transporter (NET) and SERT assays were prepared from whole brain minus striatum and cerebellum. Radiolabelled uptake assays used low-nanomolar concentrations of tracer substrate (the extracted text reports approximately 5 nM for DA and 5-HT, and 10 nM for NE) and included selective unlabeled blockers to optimise selectivity for each transporter. Compounds were characterised as uptake inhibitors or as transporter substrates/releasers, with release activity confirmed by substrate reversal (a method that distinguishes releasers from blockers). Receptor activity was measured with human receptors in cell-based functional assays. 5-HT2A-mediated Gq/11 signalling was assessed by calcium mobilisation in HEK293 cells stably expressing the human 5-HT2A receptor. 5-HT1A activity was measured by calcium mobilisation in Galpha16-CHO cells stably expressing the human 5-HT1A receptor. β-arrestin recruitment at 5-HT2A was quantified using a DiscoveRx PathHunter assay in CHO-K1 cells expressing the 5-HT2A receptor fused to a ProLink fragment; cells were plated at 15,000 cells/well, compounds incubated, and luminescence measured to derive EC50 and percent Emax values. EC50 and Emax values were obtained from three independent experiments performed in duplicate unless otherwise noted, using three-parameter logistic curve fitting. Chemical sourcing and preparation were reported briefly: many compounds were synthesised following Shulgin-style methods, some were procured from the National Institute on Drug Abuse Drug Supply Program, and others were purchased commercially. Structural variation among the panel included differing N-alkyl substitutions (from primary amines to N,N-diisopropyl) and indole ring substituents (unsubstituted, 5-methoxy, 5-hydroxy, or 4-hydroxy), allowing exploration of structure–activity relationships for transporter and receptor interactions.
Results
Twenty-one tryptamines were profiled for transporter and serotonin receptor activity. The compounds segregated into two functional groups at SERT: eight acted as SERT-mediated releasers (substrates) and the remaining 13 were either SERT uptake inhibitors or inactive in the transporter assays (compounds 2 and 23 reported as inactive). Smaller, less sterically hindered molecules (for example primary and simple secondary amines) tended to be releasers, while larger N-alkyl substituents generally produced uptake inhibition, consistent with the hypothesis that translocation through the transporter favours smaller substrates. Quantitatively, unsubstituted indole releasers displayed SERT-mediated release potencies in the low tens of nanomolar (reported EC50 range ~18.6 to 32.6 nM). N-ethyltryptamine (NETP, compound 15) was the most potent and selective 5-HT releaser in the series, with an EC50 for SERT-mediated release of 18.6 nM and relatively little activity at DAT or NET. By contrast, 5-methoxy substitutions generally reduced SERT potency: 5-MeO-DMT (compound 7) acted as a weak SERT uptake inhibitor (IC50 reported as 2,184 nM), whereas the 5-hydroxy analog bufotenin (5-OH-DMT, compound 16) was a potent SERT-mediated releaser (EC50 30.5 nM). Psilocin (N,N-dimethyl-4-hydroxytryptamine, compound 24) functioned as a moderate SERT uptake inhibitor (IC50 662 nM). Examples illustrating how small positional changes altered mechanism included the transposition of a hydroxyl from 5- to 4-position converting a substrate into an uptake inhibitor. Several examples illustrate the effect of N-substitution size: DET (compound 19) was a relatively potent SERT uptake inhibitor (IC50 258 nM) whereas its 5-methoxy analog had far lower potency (IC50 2,184 nM). Diisopropyl derivatives (DIPT and 5-MeO-DIPT) showed improved SERT inhibition relative to their monosubstituted counterparts, with reported IC50s of about 288 and 646 nM, respectively. Some N,N-dialkyl tertiary amines, notably DMT and N,N-dimethyl-5-hydroxytryptamine, were unexpectedly SERT-selective releasers (EC50s reported as ~114 nM and 30.5 nM), challenging the prevailing expectation that releasers are limited to primary or secondary amines. At the receptor level, all compounds acted as 5-HT2A agonists in calcium mobilisation assays, with a wide span of potencies and efficacies. Methoxy-substituted analogs tended to display low-nanomolar potency at 5-HT2A and were frequently active in β-arrestin recruitment, whereas many unsubstituted compounds were weaker or inactive in the β-arrestin assay. Notable receptor values included 5-methoxy-N-ethyltryptamine (compound 18) with a 5-HT2A EC50 of 1.9 nM and 112% efficacy, and an unnamed compound (25 in the text) reported as particularly potent (EC50 0.5 nM, 119% efficacy). Only a minority of compounds were 5-HT1A agonists and those that were showed partial efficacies (reported 43–95%). Most compounds that elicited Gq/11-mediated responses also recruited β-arrestin, with exceptions such as N-methyltryptamine (NMT) and DMT, which were inactive in the β-arrestin assay at the top tested concentration (the extracted text reports 10 µM). The authors report no clear correlation between the in vitro transporter or receptor profiles and the heterogeneous psychoactive effects collated from human reports; metabolic factors, pharmacokinetics and interactions with other receptors likely modulate in vivo outcomes.
Discussion
Blough and colleagues interpret their data as broadly consistent with a serotonergic basis for the pharmacology of these tryptamines: every compound acted as a 5-HT2A agonist, and many also interacted with SERT either as substrates (releasers) or as uptake inhibitors. The investigators emphasise structure–activity patterns in which sterically small compounds tend to be transporter substrates able to induce SERT-mediated 5-HT release, whereas bulkier N-alkyl substitutions reduce substrate translocation and favour uptake inhibition. The finding that certain tertiary amines (for example DMT and an N,N-dimethyl-5-hydroxy analog) behave as SERT substrates was highlighted as surprising and noteworthy because transporter substrates have typically been primary or secondary amines in prior experience. Differences in indole substitution also modulated activity: 5-methoxy substitution commonly reduced SERT releaser potency but increased 5-HT2A potency and β-arrestin recruitment in several cases, while moving a hydroxy group from the 5- to the 4-position could switch a compound from a releaser to an uptake inhibitor. These observations illustrate how small structural changes can alter both transporter mechanism and receptor functional outcomes. The authors note evidence of functional selectivity at 5-HT2A — for example variation between calcium mobilisation (Gq/11) and β-arrestin recruitment — and suggest that such biased signalling could conceivably influence behavioural effects, although further pathway-specific studies would be required to validate this. Several limitations and caveats are acknowledged. The extracted text emphasises that in vitro pharmacology does not necessarily predict human psychoactivity and that other factors — metabolic stability, monoamine oxidase metabolism, pharmacokinetic profiles, and activity at additional targets such as dopamine, trace-amine, cannabinoid, sigma-1 and kappa opioid receptors — could importantly shape in vivo effects. The authors therefore recommend broader pharmacological screening and further studies of downstream signalling pathways and in vivo pharmacology to better understand how transporter and receptor activities map onto subjective and behavioural outcomes. The overall conclusion is that while 5-HT2A agonism is a common feature of psychoactive tryptamines, SERT activity (either release or blockade) and receptor signalling bias are additional dimensions that contribute to the compounds' pharmacological diversity.
View full paper sections
RESULTS
A set of 21 tryptamines was studied in biogenic amine uptake inhibition and release assays, as well as in 5-[HT.sub.2A] and 5-[HT.sub.1A] calcium mobilization and 5-[HT.sub.2A] [beta]-arrestin recruitment assays (Tablesand). The compounds were procured commercially, obtained from the National Institute of Drug Abuse Drug Supply program, or synthesized either as reportedor following a similar synthetic route as reported. These compounds differed by Nsubstitution and indole ring substituents. Ten of the compounds were unsubstituted, nine contained methoxy groups in the 5position, one had a hydroxyl in the 5-position, and one had a hydroxyl in the 4-position. In the unsubstituted and 5methoxylated series, compounds were synthesized such that their N-alkyl groups increased in size and complexity from unsubstituted to the N, N-diisopropyl groups found on Foxy. As shown by Shulgin, these simple structural changes induce a variety of psychoactive effects, involving both auditory and visual systems, making them ideal for a pharmacological mechanistic study. Some highlights of their reported psychoactivity are listed in Tablesandas described in TiHKAL. In order to assess their activity at the biogenic amine transporters, the compounds were characterized as substrates/releasers or uptake inhibitors as previously described. Any release activity was confirmed by substrate reversal. In order to assess the activity of compounds at 5-HT G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), an in vitro calcium mobilization assay was used to measure 5-[HT.sub.2A] receptor activation in HEK293 cells and 5-[HT.sub.1A] receptor activation in G[alpha]16-CHO cells in stably transfected cell lines using the human receptors. 5-[HT.sub.2A] receptor-mediated [beta]-arrestin recruitment was measured using CHO-[beta]-arrestin-2 cells stably expressing the human 5-[HT.sub.2A] receptor fused to the small enzyme fragment ProLink (DiscoveRx PathHunter[R] technology). The tryptamines binned into two groups, depending on their SERT activity. A total of 8 compounds were found to have 5-HTreleasing activity (Table), and the remaining 13 compounds were found to be either 5-HT uptake inhibitors (Table) or were inactive (2 and 23). As expected, the smaller, less sterically encumbered compounds such as the primary amines (12 and 13), the N-methyl derivatives (14 and 17), and N-ethyl derivatives (15 and 18) were found to be releasers (Table). Most of the tryptamines in Tablewere found to be 5-HT uptake inhibitors, with very little activity at either DAT or NET. These compounds have much larger N-alkyl groups and were uptake inhibitors, presumably because the compounds were not transportable.
CONCLUSION
Our findings with the tryptamine compounds fit with the general hypothesis that psychedelic compounds are serotonergic in nature. Specifically, all of the compounds were active as 5-[HT.sub.2A] agonists and most were either SERT uptake inhibitors or transporter substrate releasers. SERT-mediated release potencies varied widely between the 5-methoxy and unsubstituted compounds. The unsubstituted indole compounds were more active as 5-HT releasers with [EC.sub.50] values in the 18.6-to 32.6-nM range. Tryptamine (), [alpha]-methyltryptamine (13), and N-methyltryptamine () also displayed releasing activity at DA transporters and NE transporters, although with much lower potency when compared to activity at the SERT. The most potent and selective 5-HT releaser was N-ethyltryptamine (15, NETP), which had an [EC.sub.50] for SERT-mediated release of 18.6 nM and was relatively inactive at the other two transporters. The 5-methoxylated version of DMT (5-MeO-DMT, 7) was a weak 5-HT uptake inhibitor ([IC.sub.50] value=2, 184 nM). This was somewhat surprising since the 5-hydroxy analog, 16, was a potent SERT-mediated releaser with an [EC.sub.50] value of 30.5 nM. 5-OHDMT (16), also known as bufotenin, is a compound reportedly found in schizophrenics and proposed as a possible disease biomarker. 5-MeO-DMT (7) and DMT () are also found naturally in psychoactive plants such as Psychotria viridis and Virola calophylla. The N, N-dimethyl-4-hydroxy analog (24, psilocin), is the active metabolite of psilocybin (5), the O-phosphoryl analog of psilocin and the hallucinogenic component of the psychoactive Psilocybe genus of mushrooms which is currently being studied clinically. Psilocin was found to have reasonable uptake inhibitory properties at the SERT, with an [IC.sub.50] value of 662 nM. The transposition of the hydroxyl group from the 5-position () to the 4-position (24) changed the activity from a SERT-mediated releaser to a SERT uptake inhibitor, meaning the 5-substituted compound was a substrate, but the 4-substituted analog was not. The uptake inhibition data for 5-MeO-DIPT (1), 5-MeO MIPT (2), and 5-MeO-DMT (7) in Tablecorrelates well with data reported by Nagai et al. who used a similar assay protocol with rat brain synaptosomes). None of the 5methoxy compounds had appreciable DA or NE uptake inhibitory properties. In all three cases, the [IC.sub.50] values for 5-HT uptake inhibition were slightly lower than reported previously, 646, >10, 000, and 2, 184 nM, respectively (see Table), compared to 2, 200, 6, 400, and 4, 100 nM), though the rank order of potency was the same. Nagai et al. also studied AMT () and found that it was a fairly potent releaser at transporters for DA, NE, and 5-HT, with [EC.sub.50] values of 180, 68, and 79 nM, respectively. Our findings with AMT were similar to those ofshown in Table.have also reported that 5-MeO-DIPT is a potent and selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor using rat brain synaptosomes with an [IC.sub.50] value of 1, 800 nM). Their value is threefold higher than our observation of 646 nM. As with the releasers, the 5-methoxy analogs were much less potent at the SERT when compared to their unsubstituted counterparts. For example, 5-MeO-DET (26) was found to have an [IC.sub.50] of 2, 184 nM, whereas DET (19) was tenfold more potent (258 nM). In general, increasing the overall size of a chemical structure was associated with lower potency at SERT uptake inhibition. However, the diisopropyl compounds, DIPT () and 5-MeO-DIPT (1), inhibited 5-HT uptake much better than their monosubstituted analogs. NIPT (20) and 5-MeO-NIPT (27) were found to be weak 5-HT uptake inhibitors with [IC.sub.50] values of 1, 487 and 5, 442 nM, respectively. The addition of a second isopropyl group (DIPT and 5-MeO-DIPT) improved SERT activity by almost an order of magnitude, to 288 and 646 nM, respectively. Even more surprising was the finding that substitution of one of the isopropyls with a methyl group to form MIPT (23) and 5-MeO-MIPT (2, Moxy) rendered the compounds totally inactive as 5-HT uptake inhibitors. Our findings also fit with the general hypothesis that releasers are transporter substrates, similar to 5-HT, while uptake inhibitors are not. This hypothesis posits that structurally small compounds tend to be releasers because they are able to be transported and hence induce transporter-mediated release. On the other hand, larger compounds cannot be substrates because steric interactions with the transporter prevent translocation. These compounds either bind at the surface of the transporter, thereby blocking reuptake of neurotransmitter, or do nothing. As noted above, N-ethyltryptamine (15) was a SERTmediated releaser, but the addition of a second N-ethyl group caused the compound to become a modestly potent 5HT uptake inhibitor (19, DET) with an [IC.sub.50] for inhibition of 25 nM. This finding reinforces the notion that bulky substituents render compounds that are too large to be transported. Presumably, both NETP and DET bind to the site of translocation, but the second ethyl group of DET prevents the transporter from making the required conformational changes to induce translocation. One of the most interesting structural observations with the transporter data involve the N, N-dimethyl analogs. Both N, Ndimethyltryptamine (6, DMT) and N, N-dimethyl-5-hydroxytryptamine () were found to be SERT-selective releasers, with [EC.sub.50] values of 114 and 30.5 nM, respectively. This observation was somewhat surprising because our previous experience has demonstrated that the vast majority of transporter substrates are primary or secondary amines. Cozzi et al. also observed substrate activity for DMT, as well as for DPT (21), DIPT (), andwhich are also N, N-dialkyl analogs and much larger than DMT. Our assay protocol uses rat synaptosomes and compares activity in SERT release and uptake inhibition. Using this protocol, the latter three compounds were found to be SERT uptake inhibitors (Table). Mechanistically, substrate-type releasers are active in both release and uptake inhibition assays, while uptake inhibitors are only active in the uptake inhibition assay. The protocol used by Cozzi et al. to identify SERT substrates was an indirect method of determining mechanism by comparing binding affinity to potency in uptake inhibition. Compounds with high binding to uptake ratios were considered SERT substrate releasers. The binding to uptake ratio protocol was originally developed by the Rothman laboratory, but this method was found to be inconsistent and replaced with a protocol similar to the release assays used hereAll of the neurotransmitter-releasing tryptamines (Table) were potent and efficacious 5-[HT.sub.2A] agonists as measured in a calcium mobilization assay. The most potent and efficacious compound of this group is 5-methoxy-N-ethyltryptamine (18), which had an [EC.sub.50] value of 1.9 nM with 112 % efficacy. Compounds that exhibited G[[alpha].sub.q/11]-mediated functional responses also promoted the recruitment of [beta]-arrestin, except for NMT () and DMT, which were inactive at 10 (M. The two methoxy derivatives (17 and 18) had similar potencies in the [beta]-arrestin recruitment assay, but 17 was 67 % efficacious as a partial agonist while 18 was fully efficacious. This difference in efficacy was also present in the 5-[HT.sub.2A] calcium assay, where 17 was less efficacious than 18. Interestingly, compound 17 and 18 displayed similar 70 % efficacy in the 5-[HT.sub.1A] receptor assay. These results indicate that adding a methoxy group to the 5-position on the phenyl ring leads to small changes in 5-[HT.sub.2A] potency but large changes in efficacy. One additional compound () was active at 5-[HT.sub.1A] with an [EC.sub.50] value of 366 nM and was 95 % efficacious as opposed to 17 and 18. All of the compounds in Tablewere also potent and efficacious 5-[HT.sub.2A] agonists in the calcium mobilization assay, with compounds 23 and 24 being the least efficacious (74 and 76 %) and compound 25 being the most potent ([EC.sub.50] of 0.5 nM) and efficacious (119 %). Interestingly, in contrast to their weak 5-HT uptake-inhibiting properties, the compounds containing a methoxy group on the phenyl ringdisplayed low nanomolar potency at the 5-[HT.sub.2A] receptor, as opposed to the unsubstituted compounds which were less active. The methoxy compounds were also among the most potent in the [beta]-arrestin recruitment assay, a trend that was also observed for two of the 5-HT releasers as well. These compounds have a range of efficacies starting at 56 % and increasing to 124 %, which does not seem to follow any trend related to N-substitution patterns. Four of the compoundswere potent at 5-[HT.sub.1A] but only partially efficacious (43-66 %). Functional selectivity is becoming an important aspect in GPCR ligand development because of the possibility that an agonist might be able to activate one downstream signaling pathway over another leading to differences in pharmacological effects. All of the compounds in Tablesandwere efficacious as 5[HT.sub.2A] agonists in the calcium mobilization assay, but interestingly, the unsubstituted compounds were weak agonists or inactive in the [beta]-arrestin recruitment assay. The methoxy-substituted compounds were all active in the [beta]-arrestin recruitment assay, although severalexhibited lower efficacies (56 to 68 %). The implications of these findings are unknown since additional experimentation would be required to validate functional selectivity, although such differences in [beta]-arrestin recruitment could alter behavioral effects. It would be interesting to extend these studies to other downstream signaling pathways such as activation of Akt and/or Erk phosphorylation. A description of reported psychoactive effects in humans has been included in Tablesandtabulated from Shulgin reportsin order to provide the reader with a sense of the wide range of psychological effects produced by tryptamine agents. There did not seem to be a correlation between in vitro activity and psychoactive effects for SERT-mediated activity, 5-[HT.sub.2A] receptor activity, or 5-[HT.sub.1A] receptor activity. The psychoactive effects of five of the compounds have not been reported. Further pharmacological characterization of these compounds would need to be conducted in order to further understand their behavioral outcomes, in particular related to metabolism by monoamine oxidasesand their pharmacokinetic profiles), which could be critical. As noted above, psychoactivity can also be influenced by a number of other receptors such as DA receptors, trace amine-associated receptors, cannabinoid receptors, the sigma-1 receptor, and the kappa opioid receptor. Future studies should employ more comprehensive pharmacological screening to explore the role of additional biological targets in the mechanism of action for psychoactive tryptamines. In conclusion, we have synthesized and studied a set of tryptamines, most of which have been reported to have psychoactivity in humans. Determining the pharmacology of hallucinogens like the tryptamines will be necessary to fully understand the recent clinical results with compounds like psilocybin noted above and for the future design of new analogs. Some of the psychoactive tryptamines were 5-HT releasers while others blocked 5-HT uptake. All of the tryptamines were 5-[HT.sub.2A] agonists, but there was a mix of activity in the [beta]-arrestin recruitment and 5-[HT.sub.1A] assays. The in vitro transporter data confirm general structure activity trends for releasers and uptake inhibitors. Releasers tend to be sterically small compounds, likely because they undergo transporter-mediated translocation. Larger compounds, which cannot be translocated and therefore cannot induce release, often block neurotransmitter uptake, possibly because they fit in the site of translocation but are too large to undergo translocation. Finally, we found no obvious relationships between the receptor/transporter activity and the reported in vivo effects of the compounds examined.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Journal