Improved colour blindness symptoms associated with recreational psychedelic use: Results from the Global Drug Survey 2017
Analysis of self-reports from the Global Drugs Survey 2017 found that 23 of 47 usable respondents described improved colour blindness after using psychedelics (commonly LSD and psilocybin), with some changes persisting from days to years. The authors present this as preliminary evidence and suggest a mechanism in which psychedelic-induced novel photisms become linked to pre-existing colour concepts via enhanced visual–linguistic cortical connectivity, recommending targeted follow-up studies.
Authors
- Ferris, J. A.
- Nutt, D. J.
Published
Abstract
It is well documented that psychedelic drugs can have a profound effect on colour perception. After previous research involving psychedelic drug ingestion, several participants had written to the authors describing how symptoms of their colour blindness had improved. The Global Drugs Survey runs the world’s largest annual online drug survey. In the Global Drugs Survey 2017, participants reporting the use of lysergic acid diethylamide or psilocybin in the last 12 months were asked, We have received reports from some people with colour-blindness that this improves after they use psychedelics. If you have experienced such an effect can you please describe it in the box below, say what drug you took and how long the effect lasted. We received 47 responses that could be usefully categorised of which 23 described improved colour blindness. Commonly cited drugs were LSD and psilocybin; however, several other psychedelic compounds were also listed. Some respondents cited that the changes in colour blindness persisted, from a period of several days to years. Improved colour blindness may be a result of new photisms experienced in the psychedelic state aligning with pre-existing concepts of colour to be ascribed a label. Connections between visual and linguistic cortical areas may be enhanced due to disorder in the brain’s neural connections induced by psychedelics allowing these new photisms and concepts to become linked. This paper provides preliminary data regarding improved colour blindness accompanying recreational psychedelic use which may be further investigated in future iterations of the Global Drugs Survey or in a stand-alone Global Drugs Survey-managed psychedelics survey.
Research Summary of 'Improved colour blindness symptoms associated with recreational psychedelic use: Results from the Global Drug Survey 2017'
Introduction
Historical and laboratory literature describes profound alterations to colour perception produced by psychedelic drugs, including changes to spectral patterns and hue discrimination. Such reports challenge simple models that treat colour vision as determined solely by retinal photoreceptors, because central processing can alter the experienced colour without changing retinal input. The authors also note anecdotal reports from prior research participants and online forums claiming that psychedelic use produced improvements in previously congenital colour-blind perception. Anthony and colleagues set out to collect preliminary, population-level data on whether recreational psychedelic use is associated with perceived improvements in colour blindness. Rather than a mechanistic experiment, the study used an exploratory item added to the Global Drug Survey 2017 to gather self-reported accounts about whether people who reported recent LSD or psilocybin use had experienced an improvement in their ability to distinguish colours and how long any change lasted. The stated aim was to assess whether this phenomenon occurs frequently enough to merit more detailed follow-up studies or a dedicated survey module.
Methods
The study analysed responses to an item embedded in the Psychedelics section of the Global Drug Survey (GDS) 2017, an annual anonymous cross-sectional online survey. GDS2017 ran for seven weeks from mid-November to the end of December 2016 and, after cleaning, included 119,075 participants overall. Recruitment was via media partners across more than 20 countries and secondary sharing on social media and forums. Multi-institutional ethics approval was obtained from institutional committees at King’s College London, the University of Queensland and the University of New South Wales. Participants who reported use of LSD or psilocybin in the prior 12 months were presented with a free-text item asking whether they had experienced an improvement in colour blindness after taking psychedelics, to say which drug they took and to report how long the effect lasted. The question was translated into 14 languages. Responses were later categorised into two groups: 1) colour blind and colour change (labelled EXPERIENCED) and 2) colour blind and no colour change (labelled NOT EXPERIENCED). For a response to count as 'experienced', it had to indicate a marked improvement in the ability to distinguish colours; reports of merely increased colour intensity without improved discrimination were classified as not experienced. The authors noted that because the question phrased ‘‘If you have experienced such an effect’’ respondents were not required explicitly to self-identify as colour blind, and that many replies were free-text narratives of variable clarity. Graphing and basic summary analyses were performed using RStudio. No specialised psychophysical testing, clinical verification of colour vision deficits, or detailed dose-response data were collected within this item.
Results
The free-text item elicited 382 responses from participants across 10 countries, of which 47 responses could be categorised against the defined criteria. Among those 47, 23 respondents (49%) reported an improved ability to discriminate colours following psychedelic use, while 24 respondents (51%) did not report such an improvement. The small number of usable responses limited quantitative inference, but the authors considered the number reporting improvement sufficient to indicate the phenomenon occurs in at least some recreational users. Fifteen of the 23 respondents who reported improvement specified the drug or drugs involved; LSD and psilocybin mushrooms were the most commonly cited. Single mentions included several novel or substituted psychedelics such as 25I-NBOMe, 2C-C, 5-MeO-DMT and 4-HO-MET. The responses did not provide evidence that any specific psychedelic produced the effect more frequently than others. Regarding duration, 39% of those reporting improved colour vision indicated the change persisted beyond the acute intoxication period, with reported persistence ranging from about three days to 'years'. The authors emphasise that these time estimates were non-specific and could not be precisely quantified from the free-text replies.
Discussion
Anthony and colleagues interpret the self-reported data as preliminary evidence that a subset of people experience an improvement in colour discrimination associated with recreational psychedelic use. They suggest that such changes are plausibly mediated by alterations in central visual processing rather than changes at the retinal level, because congenital colour blindness typically reflects a loss or alteration of cone photoreceptors in the retina. The authors propose a model in which psychedelics induce increased neural plasticity and disordered cortical signalling—linked to agonism at the 5-HT2A receptor and described in the literature as increased cortical entropy—allowing new ‘‘photisms’’ (novel colour experiences) to become associated with pre-existing linguistic concepts of colour. The paper links this account to related phenomena such as drug-induced synaesthesia and long-lasting perceptual changes previously reported after psychedelic use. The authors note parallels with evidence that psychedelics can alter emotional face processing and personality, arguing that if associations for emotion can be reorganised, so too might associations for colour. They caution that reporting bias likely affected their estimates: the question invited positive reports, and responses were self-validated anecdotes without clinical verification of the type or severity of colour blindness. Other limitations highlighted include the small number of usable responses (47/382), potential respondent fatigue because the question was placed near the end of a 20–30 minute survey, variable quality and interpretability of free-text answers, and lack of dose, set-and-setting, or standardised timing information. For future research the authors propose a more focused GDS-managed psychedelics survey or a revised questionnaire embedded in GDS that uses structured multiple-choice items to capture pre-existing colour vision deficits, the specific drug and dose, objective measures of colour discrimination and clearer quantification of persistence. They also note that rare but persistent perceptual disorders, such as hallucinogen persisting perception disorder, have been reported in the literature and that some individual case reports describe long-lasting acquired synaesthesia following psychedelic ingestion. Overall, the authors present this work as an exploratory, hypothesis-generating step pointing to an effect that merits more rigorous follow-up rather than as definitive evidence of long-term restoration of normal trichromatic vision.
View full paper sections
METHODS
Data were compiled from the GDS. GDS has been running annually since 2012 (naming convention refers to year the data are released, not the year of collection) and runs the world's largest annual online drug survey. The survey uses an anonymous crosssectional design. The GDS2017 ran for seven weeks between the second week of November and end of December 2016 involving 119,075 participants after sample cleaning. Direct participant recruitment occurred through media partnerships in over 20 countries including outlets such as Vice, The Guardian and Zeit-on-Line, with secondary recruitment occurring via sharing of the content on social media such as Facebook or discussion forums such as Reddit. Multi-institutional ethics approval was obtained from the Kings College London Research Ethics Committee 11671/001: Global Drug Survey, University of Queensland (No. 2017001452) and The University of New South Wales (HREC HC17769) Research Ethics Committees. As part of GDS2017 a series of questions were included at the end of the Psychedelics section, to probe the effects of recreational use of psychedelics on colour blindness. Participants reporting the use of LSD or psilocybin in the last 12 months were asked, translated into 14 main languages including German, Italian, French, Danish, Portuguese, Spanish, Hungarian, Flemish and Polish. Responses were categorised as follows: 1. Colour blind and colour change (EXPERIENCED) 2. Colour blind and no colour change (NOT EXPERIENCED) For a response to be marked 'experienced', the respondent had to imply a marked difference in ability to distinguish between colours; however, this effect didn't have to extend beyond the period of intoxication. Since the question was asked, 'If you have experienced such an effect', implying both colour blindness and improvement, respondents weren't required to positively identify as colour blind. Several respondents reported experiences of increased colour intensity; however, these were marked negative as this did not prove an increased ability to discern between colours. An ideal 'experienced' response (ID 19670) was, 'LSD, I'm red/green colour blind and the effect lasted the following 3 or 4 days'. An ideal 'not experienced' response (ID 13385) was, 'I have deuteranopia, but unfortunately I didn't sense any change in my colour perception on psilocybin. (I also figured this out using example images for people with colour blindness)'. Graphs were constructed using RStudio (RStudio Team, 2019).
RESULTS
The question received 382 responses from 10 different countries of which 47 responses could be categorised with regards to the question. Of the categorised responses, 23 experienced and 24 didn't experience improved colour blindness symptoms (Figure). Despite the low number of categorised responses, there was a sufficient number of respondents reporting improved colour blindness to suggest that, in some people, recreational psychedelic use may improve colour blindness. We were interested in whether the specific psychedelic drug used would influence the prevalence of improved colour blindness being experienced. Of the 23 respondents who experienced the effect, 15 indicated the drug used, with some indicating multiple drugs. LSD and psilocybin mushrooms were the most commonly cited psychedelic drugs (Figure). There were single mentions of novel psychedelic substances used with which this effect occurred. This included substituted 2C family drugs such as 25I-NBOMe and 2C-C and several novel substituted tryptamines such as 5-MeO-DMT and 4-HO-MET. Responses did not indicate that a specific drug induced changes in colour blindness with a greater frequency than other drugs. The question also asked about the length of time the changes in colour blindness lasted for. Of respondents who experienced changes in their colour blindness, 39% indicated that their changed perception continued for a period after the drug had worn off ranging from three days to 'years'. The time frames given for persistence of this phenomenon beyond the immediate effects of the drug were largely non-specific and further quantification was not possible due to the nature of the responses given.
CONCLUSION
This study explored the effects of recreational psychedelic use on colour blindness through a self-reported survey question included in GDS2017. There were 382 responses to the question of which 47 could be categorised. Of these, 23/47 reported experiencing improved colour blindness relating to recreational psychedelic use, defined as an improved ability to discriminate between colours. Respondents reported a range of drugs and time frames associated with improved colour vision. The number of respondents reporting improved colour blindness suggests that such improvements do occur in a proportion of recreational users of psychedelics. Psychedelics may facilitate the experience of an expanded spectrum of colours. In the excited psychedelic state, new communication between cortical regions may link new photisms to pre-existing concepts of colours, thus facilitating a new colour experience and improving colour blindness. The self-reported anonymous nature of the GDS made it hard to verify claims and the 20-30 minutes length of the survey meant responses to this question, placed at the end, may have been affected by participant fatigue, thus reducing their quality and utility. In the future, we plan to run a more in depth GDS managed psychedelics survey to further gather reports regarding this phenomenon. Psychedelics do not alter the innate nature of the visual signal from the retina because the defect is of genetic origin -the result of fewer 'colour-sensing' cones in the retina. The signal sent to the primary visual cortex from the retina likely remains unchanged under the influence of psychedelics. Colour signals are then processed, via the ventral visual pathway, in the V4 region of the occipital cortex and it is from this point that psychedelics may affect higher order processing and ultimately perception of colour. Psychedelics may result in new colours being experienced, termed 'alien' photisms. In the psychedelic state, increased neural plasticity may aid the formation of associations between new photisms and pre-existing concepts of colours that were not previously distinguished, thus improving the range of colours experienced and improving colour blindness. Classical psychedelics, such as LSD and psilocybin, are 5-HT 2A receptor agonists; however, each psychedelic drug has its own unique binding profile, particularly regarding other 5-HT receptor subtypes. These differences may affect the extent to which different psychedelic drugs can improve colour blindness; however, the nature of the responses provided did not allow such analysis. Despite the variation in binding profiles, most psychedelic drugs principally agonise the 5-HT 2A receptor. Agonism at this receptor depolarises deep-layer pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortexresulting in disordered signalling and a window of increased neural plasticity, described byas the 'Entropic Brain Hypothesis'. The period of increased uninhibited cortical signalling induced by modulation of the 5-HT 2A receptor may enable new neural connections to form. Psilocybin, a classical psychedelic, has been shown to increase the formation of homological scaffolds of brain functional networks under fMRI analysisand such changes in brain chemistry may persist beyond the immediate pharmacological actions of the drug. We propose that the new neural networks may enable new associations between the perceived and linguistically known colour of objects, altering the experience of colour perception. Under the influence of psychedelic drugs, users may experience an expanded array of colours, possibly as a result of enhanced entropy in the V4 cortex leading to over-exaggerated cross visual field comparisons. This does not necessarily mean the colours seen of objects are more representative of their true colour, merely a wider variety of colours are experienced. Some of the colours experienced in this state may be entirely new to the user. Colour blind synaesthetes have reported experiencing 'alien' photisms, which are reported to not exist within the range of their normal perception, in relation to certain numbers, showing the ability of the brain to alter the experience of colour beyond optic nerve input. Thus, the notion of a new colour being experienced under the influence of psychedelic drugs is not unfathomable. The 'alien' colours experienced whilst under the influence of psychedelic drugs may become ascribed to objects based upon known linguistic ideas of any object, for example an apple is red or the sky is blue. Despite having difficulty distinguishing these colours, depending on the type of colour blindness, individuals still have a concept of these colours. Congenitally blind children have been shown to have a 69-80% agreement in associations of colours relative to their sighted counterparts. For example, yellow may be conceptualised as a 'happy, nice, shiny colour'. It was shown that these concepts of colour were purely language based and relied on being taught their associations. Alien colours experienced in the psychedelic state may align with the colour-blind user's conceptual understanding of a colour they are not normally able to observe. This may be ascribed to certain objects leading to lexically driven changes in the perception of specific objects in line with their colour. Such changes would be unlikely to occur universally or consistently due to different colour associations between individuals coupled to different sets and settings. Synaesthesia may be traditionally be thought of as 'seeing sound' or mixing of traditional special senses; however, there are a plethora of other inducerconcurrent associations. There are a variety of explanations for the phenomenon of synaesthesia including increased neural connectivity in the psychedelic stateor cortical disinhibition and hyperexcitability. It is feasible that increased connection between regions of the cortex responsible for higher colour perception, V4, to concepts of colour in language centres may occur in the psychedelic state through 'noisy' disordered signalling. New connections between these aforementioned areas of association cortex complement Whorfian ideas of colour discrimination which may affect an individual's perceptions of coloured objects, consequently leading to the improvement of colour discrimination in the colour blind. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest serotonergic hallucinogens can affect recognition of facial expressions. LSD has been shown to reduce recognition of sad or fearful faces alongside enhancing emotional empathy. In a different study, the day after a 25-milligram psilocybin treatment, enhanced amygdala responses to emotional faces, particularly fearful ones, were found, suggesting alterations in the manner in which depressed patients respond to emotional stimuli. The brain contains concepts of emotions and if the response to emotional stimuli and their associations in the brain can be altered it is plausible that our associations of colours and thus their perception can be changed too, particularly because the raw visual signals entering the brain in the cases of recognising facial expression and processing colour are constant. Long term changes in colour blindness, lasting beyond psychedelic experience, were reported by 39% of respondents. This would suggest that such effects are likely to be common in a larger proportion of the colour-blind population. However, the number of colour-blind respondents not experiencing this was likely underreported due to the positive nature of the question and thus this high proportion is likely an artefact of the wording. A possible reason for the persistence of changes in colour vision could be the extrapharmacological effects of psychedelics such as set and setting, which likely vary between respondents, producing lasting changes in neural networks. Dosage may also account for this as levels of 5-HT 2A receptor occupancy have been shown to correlate with the intensity of effects experiencedwhich may complement the extra-pharmacological effects. However, the design of the GDS study makes it difficult to control for these factors. There are recorded instances of psychedelic-induced visual perceptual changes persisting. Hallucinogen persisting perception disorder is estimated to have an occurrence of 1/50,000 in regular users of psychedelic drugsand some case studies have reported symptoms lasting for months or years. Recently, a case of acquired synaesthesia was reported in a 29-year-old male following the use of 2C-B which had persisted for over seven years. This study found that a proportion of colour-blind participants reported improved colour blindness following the recreational use of psychedelics, defined as an improved ability to discern between colours. There are several limitations to the study. The data consisted of self-reported anecdotes of variable quality, some of which proved hard to interpret, thus making accurate quantification and standardised interpretation difficult. The reports were self-validated both as to the nature of the colour blindness and whether this phenomenon was experienced. Colour blindness is not a unimodal disorder and different forms of colour blindness may have been affected differently. We were unable to obtain this level of detail with the responses given. The question was asked in a 'special section' at the end of GDS2017 which itself takes 20-30 minutes to complete and number of usable responses was small, 47/382. Some responses didn't relate to the question or were too difficult to decipher, which may reflect participant fatigue. Language barriers were unlikely to play a role due to the wide variety of language translations available. In future iterations of the GDS, we plan to revisit this exploratory study and more clearly identify the nature of pre-existing colour vision deficit and more specifically assess changes in visual perception, the drug taken and better quantification of the persistence of the effects. Rather than a free-text response, participants could provide answers in a multiple-choice format with the question deconstructed into discrete parts. Due to the length of the standard GDS, a GDS managed stand-alone psychedelics survey may be more suitable to minimise participant fatigue. This would enable a variety of phenomena regarding recreational use of psychedelics to be evaluated, not just colour perception, such as visual acuity which was mentioned by several respondents.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicssurvey
- Journal
- Compounds