Hallucinogens and Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Signaling Pathways
This book chapter (2018) describes the history, physiological response to psychedelics, and signaling pathway activated by serotonin (5-HT) 2A receptors.
Authors
- González-Maeso, J.
- López-Giménez, J. F.
Published
Abstract
The neuropsychological effects of naturally occurring psychoactive chemicals have been recognized for millennia. Hallucinogens, which include naturally occurring chemicals such as mescaline and psilocybin, as well as synthetic compounds, such as lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), induce profound alterations of human consciousness, emotion, and cognition. The discovery of the hallucinogenic effects of LSD and the observations that LSD and the endogenous ligand serotonin share chemical and pharmacological profiles led to the suggestion that biogenic amines like serotonin were involved in the psychosis of mental disorders such as schizophrenia. Although they bind other G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes, studies indicate that several effects of hallucinogens involve agonist activity at the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. In this chapter, we review recent advances in understanding hallucinogen drug action through characterization of structure, neuroanatomical location, and function of the 5-HT2A receptor.
Research Summary of 'Hallucinogens and Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Signaling Pathways'
Introduction
López-Giménez and colleagues frame the chapter within a long-standing interest in how hallucinogenic drugs — including mescaline, psilocybin and LSD — produce profound alterations in perception, emotion and cognition. Earlier pharmacological and clinical observations linked the actions of hallucinogens to the serotonergic system, and subsequent work identified the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor as a principal mediator of many hallucinogen effects. The Introduction therefore sets out the conceptual background of receptor pharmacology (especially G protein-coupled receptors, GPCRs) and the specific relevance of 5-HT2A receptors to the neuropsychological actions of hallucinogens. This chapter aims to review recent advances in understanding hallucinogen drug action by characterising the structure, neuroanatomical localisation and signalling functions of the 5-HT2A receptor. The authors focus on molecular and cellular signalling pathways, receptor–protein interactions and receptor complexes (notably with metabotropic glutamate receptors), and how these mechanisms may differentiate hallucinogenic from non‑hallucinogenic 5-HT2A agonists. The review emphasises translational links from cellular assays and rodent models to human neuropharmacology.
Methods
The extracted text presents this work as a narrative, mechanistic review synthesising molecular, cellular, anatomical and behavioural studies rather than a systematic review with a specified search strategy. The authors integrate data from radioligand autoradiography, heterologous expression systems, gene‑expression profiling, phosphoproteomics, knockout and transgenic mouse models, electrophysiology, and human pharmacology studies. The chapter draws on both in vitro assays (for example HEK293 and CHO‑K1 cell systems) and in vivo rodent experiments, as well as postmortem human brain autoradiography. The extracted material does not clearly report a formal methods section describing literature search criteria, inclusion/exclusion rules, or quality assessment procedures. Instead, the approach is to combine historic pharmacological findings with recent experimental results to build mechanistic models explaining how distinct ligands acting at the same 5-HT2A receptor can produce different cellular and behavioural outcomes. Where relevant, the authors report specific experimental manipulations (e.g. genetic knockouts, pertussis toxin treatment, viral overexpression and use of selective radioligands) that underpin the mechanistic conclusions.
Results
The chapter summarises multiple lines of evidence about 5-HT2A receptor biology and signalling. At the anatomical level, autoradiography with selective antagonist radioligands such as [3H]MDL100,907 shows a heterogeneous distribution of 5-HT2A binding sites across mammalian brains, with the highest density in neocortex concentrated in pyramidal neurons. The corpus striatum exhibits a species‑dependent, compartmentalised pattern in humans (patchy labelling corresponding to striosomes), whereas other species (cow, monkey) show different distributions; the authors stress that these cross‑species differences complicate extrapolation from common laboratory animals to humans. Pharmacologically, both hallucinogenic and non‑hallucinogenic compounds can bind and activate 5-HT2A receptors, but closely related agonists differ in their behavioural effects: classical hallucinogens (LSD, mescaline, psilocin, DOI, DOB, DOM) produce psychosis‑like effects that are blocked by 5-HT2A antagonists, whereas some ergot derivatives (lisuride, ergotamine) are non‑hallucinogenic despite acting at the same receptor. Genetic evidence supports a central role for 5-HT2A: hallucinogen‑induced head‑twitch behaviour in rodents is absent in 5-HT2A knockout mice. Mechanistic studies support the concept of biased agonism at 5-HT2A. Although Gq/11‑mediated activation of phospholipase C (PLC) and subsequent inositol phosphate/Ca2+ signalling is a well characterised pathway, its efficacy does not correlate directly with hallucinogenic behavioural effects: hallucinogens stimulate PLC‑IP signalling with relatively low efficacy and Gαq knockout only slightly reduces DOI‑induced head‑twitch. By contrast, hallucinogen‑specific signalling involves additional pathways, notably pertussis toxin (PTX)‑sensitive Gi/o proteins and downstream ERK1/2 activation. Transcriptomic profiling demonstrated reproducible, ligand‑specific gene‑expression fingerprints: c‑Fos and IκBα were induced by both hallucinogenic and non‑hallucinogenic agonists, whereas immediate early genes Egr‑1 and Egr‑2 were consistently induced only by hallucinogens (DOI, DOM, DOB, mescaline, LSD, psilocin). These hallucinogen‑specific transcriptomic signatures were abolished in 5-HT2A knockout somatosensory cortex, supporting receptor dependence. Complementary phosphoproteomic work reported distinct phosphorylation patterns elicited by hallucinogenic versus non‑hallucinogenic 5-HT2A agonists in HEK293 cells, and PTX pre‑treatment abolished ERK1/2 phosphorylation induced by DOI and LSD but not responses to non‑hallucinogenic agonists. Together these data indicate that hallucinogens selectively engage Gi/o‑dependent signalling in addition to Gq pathways. The authors also detail protein interaction networks that shape 5-HT2A function. The extreme C‑terminal tetrapeptide (VSCV) is a canonical Type I PDZ‑binding motif that mediates interaction with PDZ proteins such as PSD‑95; PSD‑95 association enhances Gq/11 coupling, inhibits agonist‑induced internalisation and is required for normal 5-HT2A‑dependent head‑twitch behaviour and induction of genes including c‑Fos and Egr‑1 in mice. Other interacting partners and pathways include JAK2–STAT3 signalling (STAT3 co‑precipitates with 5-HT2A and JAK2), ARF1‑dependent activation of phospholipase D (PLD) that requires an NPxxY motif, and PKC‑dependent receptor internalisation that differs between human and rat receptor isoforms (serine 457 in human influences recycling kinetics). Downstream intracellular effectors and modulators of 5-HT2A signalling covered include DARPP‑32 phosphorylation state changes (multiple phosphorylation sites affect PP1 and PKA activity), and regulation of neurotrophin expression: DOI induces regionally divergent BDNF mRNA changes (down in hippocampus, up in neocortex), an effect blocked by selective 5-HT2A antagonists and modulated by mGlu2/3 ligands and stress. A prominent theme is functional cross‑talk between 5-HT2A and metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGlu2). Electrophysiological studies show that the mGlu2/3 agonist LY354740 suppresses 5-HT2A‑induced excitatory postsynaptic potentials/currents and blocks DOI‑induced head‑twitch behaviour; similar effects are seen with other mGlu2/3 agonists. The authors describe biochemical and ultrastructural evidence that 5-HT2A and mGlu2 receptors form a heteromeric GPCR complex in mouse and human frontal cortex. Functionally, mGlu2 knockout mice show markedly reduced head‑twitch responses to DOI and LSD; viral overexpression of wild‑type mGlu2 in frontal cortex rescues DOI‑induced head‑twitch in mGlu2 knockouts, whereas expression of an mGlu2/mGlu3 chimera that fails to form the heteromer (mGlu2∆TM4N) does not rescue the behaviour. These observations indicate that the 5-HT2A–mGlu2 heteromeric complex is critical for hallucinogen‑like behaviours in mice. The chapter notes that expression alterations of 5-HT2A and mGlu2 have been observed in postmortem frontal cortex of schizophrenic subjects, suggesting translational relevance, but also emphasises that GPCR heteromerisation remains a debated topic. Finally, the authors report practical experimental findings that support these mechanistic claims: antagonist blockade of psychosis‑like effects in humans (ketanserin blocks LSD/psilocybin effects), PDZ‑protein effects on receptor signalling and behaviour in knockout mice, and differential effects of kinase inhibitors and ARF mutants on vascular and cellular responses to 5-HT2A activation.
Discussion
López‑Giménez and colleagues interpret the assembled evidence to propose that hallucinogens are distinctive because they stabilise particular active conformations of the 5-HT2A receptor that engage a characteristic subset of downstream signalling pathways. This biased agonism model explains how chemically related agonists acting at the same receptor can produce different cellular transcriptomic and phosphoproteomic fingerprints and thereby distinct behavioural outcomes. In particular, hallucinogens appear to recruit both Gq/11 and Gi/o signalling (the latter being PTX‑sensitive) as well as non‑G protein mechanisms involving scaffold proteins such as PSD‑95, β‑arrestins and ARF1‑dependent pathways; these combined signalling events correlate with hallucinogen‑specific gene induction (Egr‑1, Egr‑2) and behavioural readouts such as the rodent head‑twitch. The authors position these findings relative to earlier research by highlighting genetic and pharmacological converging evidence: 5-HT2A knockout animals lack hallucinogen‑induced behaviours, 5-HT2A antagonists block psychosis‑like effects in human challenge studies, and mGlu2 deletion or disruption of the 5-HT2A–mGlu2 heteromer markedly reduces hallucinogen behavioural effects. They further caution that substantial cross‑species differences in 5-HT2A neuroanatomy (for example striatal compartmentalisation patterns) limit straightforward extrapolation from commonly used laboratory species to humans. The authors also note that the functional significance of GPCR homo‑ and heteromerisation is still controversial and requires further validation. Key limitations and uncertainties acknowledged in the text include the incomplete understanding of how specific intracellular cascades translate into complex neuropsychological states, unresolved issues about the physiological relevance of some protein–protein interactions observed in vitro, and the debated generalisability of animal models to human subjective effects. The authors call for additional basic and translational research — including more refined molecular, circuit, and behavioural studies — to define which signalling and neuronal circuit mechanisms are necessary and sufficient for hallucinogen action. In terms of implications, the chapter suggests that elucidating biased signalling at 5-HT2A has potential therapeutic relevance: understanding which pathways mediate desirable versus adverse effects could guide the design of novel drugs that retain therapeutic efficacy without unwanted psychoactive properties. The authors also point to emerging clinical evidence that under medical supervision some hallucinogens may have therapeutic utility for conditions such as alcoholism, obsessive–compulsive disorder and cluster headache, arguing for continued research into both mechanisms and clinical applications.
View full paper sections
INTRODUCTION TO RECEPTOR PHARMACOLOGY
The concept of cellular receptors as we currently know was originally conceived at the end of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century by pioneering physiologists such asand. At that time, it was speculated that "something" located either at the cell surface or within cells could "read" the chemical information contained in substances present in the environment in such a way that this information is finally converted into observable physiological effects. Later in the 1930s, the British pharmacologist Alfred Joseph Clark introduced the receptor theory as a quantitative discipline. He proposed that the data obtained in experimental assays were the result of unimolecular interactions between the evaluated drug and a type of "substance" found at the cell surface corresponding to what we know now as receptor. Currently, it is widely accepted that receptors exist in several forms, including proteins localized at the cell surface, such as enzymes, ion channels, and transporters, as well as nuclear and cytosolic proteins. These receptors are organized in superfamilies according to their protein structure; the largest of these groups includes the seven transmembrane (7TM) receptors, also known as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) because their final response is essentially generated by the activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. From a structural point of view, these receptors are peptides that cross the lipid bilayer through seven transmembrane domains in such a way that they are embedded in the plasma membrane with the amino terminus facing the extracellular space and the carboxyl terminus orientated towards the cytoplasm. At the same time, three extracellular and three intracellular loops interconnect these domains. The recent explosion in GPCR crystal structures confirms these biophysical features. The most extensively characterized mechanism of action of these receptors resides in their coupling to G proteins after binding to a specific activating element known in pharmacology as an agonist. G proteins are heterotrimeric complexes found at the plasma membrane and they are constituted by monomeric Gα subunits and Gβγ dimeric subunits. Following their interaction with an activated receptor, Gα monomeric proteins dissociate from Gβγ subunits and exchange GDP guanine nucleotide for GTP. Subsequently, the Gα subunits bound to GTP initiate different second messenger cascades at the intracellular level by interacting with other proteins such as adenylyl cyclases or phospholipases. The sequential activation or inhibition of these different elements in a cascade fashion constitutes the biological process known as cell signaling, which may be initiated at the cell surface by the activation of receptors and often concludes in the cell nucleus with modulated transcription of different genes. All of these cell signaling processes, initiated upon the activation of GPCRs, can be terminated at different points. At the G protein level, bound GTP is hydrolyzed to GDP through the GTPase activity of the Gα subunit, permitting its association with Gβγ subunits to reassemble the heterotrimeric complex, allowing the signaling process to commence again. In the case of GPCRs, receptor activation may be terminated by phosphorylation of different amino acids in the intracellular loops or in the carboxy terminus by specific receptor kinases known as GPCR kinases (GRKs), which leads to receptor desensitization with respect to its G protein coupling. At the same time, phosphorylated receptors are susceptible to interact with β-arrestins, a family of cytosolic proteins involved in the endocytosis of receptors after their activation by agonist molecules. Once receptors are internalized within the different intracellular compartments, the endosomes may either divert to lysosomes by following different degradation pathways, or alternatively may recycle back to the plasma membrane where the receptors will be restored in a state that is susceptible to activation once again by an agonist ligand. Receptor internalization can be considered as another mechanism that completes the cell signaling processes initiated by receptor activation. This general paradigm has been widely accepted until the present time and it is based, for the most part, on the investigations carried out over several decades by Robert Lefkowitz and his collaborators who used the β 2 adrenoceptor as an experimental model. Nevertheless, new findings discovered in more recent investigations have contributed to a conceptual expanding of this general mechanistic model. Specifically, some recent reports suggest that β-arrestins play new roles in addition to those originally linked to receptor endocytosis. One of these new functions includes the participation of β-arrestins as scaffolding elements that help to facilitate the transmission of signaling from receptors to diverse intracellular effectors-indicating that G proteins, although considered as the canonical pathway for the signal transmission in GPCRs, are not the exclusive elements connecting these receptors to cell signaling pathways. Similarly, recent investigations conducted with β 2 adrenoceptors have revealed their capacity to couple to Gα subunits from the lumen of endosomes, meaning that the activation of intracellular effectors continues following endocytosis. Taken together, this intricate amalgam of interacting proteins demonstrates the extreme complexity of the molecular mechanisms involved in the function of these receptors at the cellular level, and makes patent the large number of unanswered questions remaining in this field of knowledge. As evidence of their biological relevance, approximately 900 different types of GPCRs have been identified in the human genome; these receptors participate in the majority of the physiological processes including sense perceptions, as well as neuropsychological, cardiovascular, and endocrine functions, and are the therapeutic target of nearly half of the total number of medicines that are currently prescribed for the treatment of diseases.
SEROTONIN
The discovery of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) dates back to the middle of the nineteenth century when early experimenters recognized that a substance contained in serum was capable of inducing the contraction of smooth muscle. Later in the first third of the twentieth century, Italian scientists extracted a substance from enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal tract, named for this reason "enteramine", that also caused smooth muscle contraction, particularly in stomach and uterus). Nearly at the same time, during the 1940s, Maurice Rapport isolated and characterized a substance from blood that acted as a vasoconstrictor; they called the compound serotonin due to these peculiarities, i.e., serum and tonic). The similar chemical structures observed for enteramine and serotonin, basically defined by the presence of an indole entity, led to conjecture that both substances corresponded essentially to the same compound; this point was corroborated later when serotonin was first synthesized and found to have the same properties as the substances obtained from natural sources, i.e., enterochromaffin cells and serum. The intimate relationship between 5-HT signaling and hallucinogens was envisaged during the period of intense research activity that coincided with the discovery of this biogenic amine.serendipitously discovered the hallucinogenic properties of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). In 1951, John Gaddum at the University of Edinburgh reported the antagonistic action of LSD on the effects induced by 5-HT in rat uterus and rabbit ear preparations (see. These results, together with the demonstration in 1968 by George Aghajanian at Yale University that LSD modulates the activity of midbrain neurons containing 5-HT, led to conjecture that the psychoactive effects of LSD were mediated by its interaction with the serotonergic system in the CNS. Currently, it is common knowledge that 5-HT is present in all animal organisms where it participates in numerous physiological functions by acting either as a hormone or as a neurotransmitter. 5-HT can be found in the body at the peripheral level in platelets, mastocytes, and enterochromaffin cells, and in the central nervous system (CNS) in serotonergic neurons located preferentially in the brainstem, which only contains 1-2% of the total amount of 5-HT present in the whole organism. 5-HT is synthesized from tryptophan, an essential amino acid that is obtained from food, following two biochemical reactions. First, tryptophan is hydroxylated to 5hydroxytryptophan by the enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase. Second, 5-hydroxytryptophan is decarboxylated by an amino decarboxylase, resulting finally in 5-HT. Tryptophan hydroxylase is the rate-limiting step in this sequential reaction. Control of the synthesis of 5-HT is also determined by the availability of oxygen, the heterocyclic compound pteridine, and by the amount of tryptophan present in the bloodstream. The principal route of degradation of 5-HT is by deamination, which is performed by monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes. The deamination of 5-HT results in the formation of 5-hydroxyindolacetaldehyde, which in turn is oxidized to the final metabolite 5-hydoxyindolacetic acid or 5-HIAA). In the CNS, 5-HT plays a fundamental role as a neurotransmitter. However, 5-HT is not able to cross the blood-brain barrier, which means that it must be synthesized within the brain from tryptophan. This synthesis takes place in a cluster of specific neurons with their soma restrictively located in the different raphe nuclei of the brainstem. Axons originating from these neurons innervate practically the entire brain, projecting their terminals to either the fore-brain (upper raphe nuclei) or to the spinal cord (lower raphe nuclei). 5-HT is released from terminals into the synaptic cleft where it is liberated to interact with specific receptors located mainly in postsynaptic neurons. Once neurotransmission occurs, 5-HT is taken back up into serotonergic neurons by specific transporters found on the plasma membrane of presynaptic terminals and is either stored for future synaptic release or metabolized by MAO enzymes. 5-HT performs its physiological functions by binding to specific cell membrane receptors. Currently, 14 different serotonin receptors, classified into 7 subfamilies according to their primary structure and functional properties, have been described. Excluding 5-HT 3 , which belongs to the ion channel receptor superfamily, the remainder of the 5-HT receptors are GPCRs.
SEROTONIN RECEPTORS
Despite the fact that the existence of at least two different subtypes of 5-HT receptors (initially referred as D and M) had been reported in the 1950s, it was not until the mid-1970s when different 5-HT receptor subtypes were pharmacologically characterized in mammalian brain homogenates using radioligand binding techniques newly developed during that period. Several radioligands developed during that period (such as [ 3 H]5-HT, [ 3 H]LSD and [ 3 H] spiperone) were found to bind to sites suspected to be 5-HT receptors. During the course of those early investigations, it was observed that radioligands differentiated between two classes of 5-HT sites; binding sites with high affinity for [ 3 H]5-HT were designated as 5-HT 1 receptors, whereas a second population of sites with high affinity for [ 3 H]spiperone and low affinity for [ 3 H] 5-HT were designated as 5-HT 2 receptors. In this way, by the mid-1980s up to five different 5-HT receptors were described based on their pharmacological profile. The extensive development of new molecular biology techniques that occurred at the end of the 1980s through the beginning of the 1990s permitted cloning of the 14 5-HT receptor subtypes that are currently known. Thus, the contemporary classification of 5-HT receptors has been made according to genetic homologies; consequently, the classification of 5-HT receptors is based on their primary structure, as determined by their amino acid sequence, which in turn is responsible for the functional properties of these cell membrane proteins (for reviews, see. The 5-HT 2 receptor subfamily comprises three different subtypes, namely 5-HT 2A , 5-HT 2B and 5-HT 2C , which are grouped together due to their high structural homology (their genetic sequences are about 50% identical). After interaction with 5-HT or another agonist, 5-HT 2 receptors couple preferentially to G q/11 proteins, promoting the subsequent activation of phospholipase C (PLC). In turn, PLC activation promotes the generation of intracellular inositol phosphates (IP) and promotes the mobilization of intracellular calcium. The 5-HT 2A receptor corresponds to the D-type 5-HT receptor described by Gaddum and Picarelli and later characterized by Peroutka and Snyder as a site exhibiting high affinity for [ 3 H] spiperone. There is extensive evidence that the 5-HT 2A receptor is responsible for the neuropsychological effects of serotonergic hallucinogens in animal models used for experimentation as well as in human subjects. This chapter is focused on the biochemical and pharmacological properties of the 5-HT 2A receptor in relation to its role in the effects of hallucinogenic drugs of abuse, such as LSD, mescaline, and psilocybin.
CHEMICAL NEUROANATOMY OF 5-HT 2A RECEPTORS
The major physiological effects induced by hallucinogens, in particular when evaluated in human subjects, are related to altered states of consciousness, including changes in cognition, mood, and perception. It is widely accepted at the present time that these effects are generated mostly by the interaction of hallucinogens with 5-HT 2A receptors as agonists. Although hallucinogens do not bind exclusively to 5-HT 2A receptors (LSD binds to most 5-HT receptor sub-types as well as to dopaminergic and adrenergic receptors), it has been evidenced in both humans and experimental animals that the activation of 5-HT 2A receptors is necessary to generate hallucinogenesis and a related behavioral response in animals. Therefore, the study of the anatomic distribution of 5-HT 2A receptor in the CNS is essential to elucidate what brain structures are implicated in the neuropsychological effects elicited by hallucinogenic compounds. As noted above, the development of radiochemicals based on the isotopic labeling of particular ligands permitted the characterization of receptors as binding sites specifically recognized by these radioligands. In addition, by exposure to sensitive autoradiographic films, these radioligands can be used to visualize the distribution of their binding sites in histological sections obtained from the human brain postmortem. The initial receptor autoradiography studies investigating 5-HT 2A receptor localization were conducted using either antagonist ([ 3 H] spiperone and [ 3 H]ketanserin) or agonist ([ 3 H]LSD and [ 125 I]DOI) radioligands. Although all of these radioligands have high affinity for 5-HT 2A receptors, they are not completely selective because they bind to sites corresponding to dopamine receptors ([ 3 H]spiperone), adrenergic receptors ([ 3 H] ketanserin), or to other 5-HT 2 receptor subtypes ([ 125 I]DOI). Because of this nonspecific binding, blockers for those undesired binding sites must be used in order to obtain a specific signal corresponding to 5-HT 2A receptors. Another issue that must be taken into consideration when conducting quantitative receptor autoradiography experiments is the pharmacological nature of the radioligand used (in terms of being an agonist or an antagonist). According to the ternary complex model of drug receptor interactions (see below), antagonist radioligands label the entire population of receptors (inactive [R] and active [R*] states), whereas agonist radioligands selectively bind to the receptors present in their active conformation (R*)-therefore detecting only a fraction of the total receptor population. The development of [ 3 H]MDL100,907, a highly selective 5-HT 2A receptor antagonist, in the mid-1990s, addressed many of the problems associated with other 5-HT 2A receptor radioligands, particularly in receptor autoradiography studies where [ 3 H]MDL100,907 displayed a remarkably specific signal devoid of nonspecific binding. The anatomic localization of 5-HT 2A receptors in primate brain visualized with [ 3 H]MDL100,907 showed a heterogeneous and wide-ranging distribution throughout different brain areas, and was comparable to that observed in other mammalian species. The region containing the highest density of 5-HT 2A binding sites was the neocortex, where the autoradiographic signal displayed a banded pattern corresponding predominantly to pyramidal neurons distributed according to the cytoarchitectural organization of different cortical areas. Other regions where 5-HT 2A receptors were detected included structures of the hippocampus, thalamic nuclei, the mammillary bodies in the hypothalamus, and different nuclei of the midbrain. The corpus striatum is a brain structure where 5-HT 2A receptors distribution is paradoxical when comparing different mammalian species. Initial investigations of 5-HT 2A receptor distribution, performed using [ 3 H]ketanserin as the radioligand, described a homogeneous pattern of labeling throughout caudate and putamen nuclei in both rat and human brain samples, with a high component of nonspecific binding. The nonspecific binding was attributed to the vesicular monoamine transporter since it could be blocked by tetrabenazine. Interestingly, when equivalent histological sections were incubated with agonist radioligands such as [ 3 H]LSD or [ 125 I]DOI, the autoradiographic signal did not show the abundance of nonspecific binding observed with [ 3 H]ketanserin, and the pattern of distribution was markedly heterogeneous. Binding sites were particularly enriched in the nucleus accumbens and in the posterior portion of the caudate-putamen in rat brain, whereas in human samples the distribution displayed a characteristic patchy pattern in both caudate and putamen nuclei corresponding to striosomes. Striosomes were originally discovered by acetylcholinesterase histochemistry and are anatomical structures differentiated from the rest of the striatum or matrix. In terms of neuronal connections, striosomes and matrix can be differentiated based on their inputoutput systems. Afferents reaching the matrix originate predominantly from areas related to sensorimotor processing, whereas striosomes receive inputs essentially from limbic regions. On the other hand, the caudate and putamen matrix projects mainly to the pallidum and the substantia nigra pars reticulata, whereas striosomal afferents target dopaminergic nigral neurons. Other radioligands derived from psychoactive compounds, such as benzodiazepines and opioids, also displayed a patchy distribution of labeling in human striatum; suggesting, therefore, the participation of this anatomic structure in neuropsychological effects produced by these types of drugs). Although it was originally speculated that 5-HT 2A binding sites in striosomes may correspond to the active conformation of these receptors, where agonist drugs with hallucinogenic effects (such as [ 3 H]LSD and [ 125 I]DOI) bind, this possibility was later disproved by experiments performed with the antagonist radioligand [ 3 H]MDL100,907, which produced the same patchy distribution of striatal labeling that was observed in consecutive histological sections treated with [ 125 I]DOI (Lopez-Gimenez et al. 1999) (Fig.). The peculiar compartmentalized distribution of 5-HT 2A receptors in the human corpus striatum is not found in all mammalian species. [ 125 I]DOI labeling of 5-HT 2A receptors in striosomes has been clearly observed in human, mouse, and guinea pig brain. By contrast, no striosome labeling has been detected in rat, cat, pig, cow, or monkey brain. The results reported for cow and monkey are especially remarkable: the autoradiographic signal in cow striatum is high, specific, and homogeneous, whereas only sparse 5-HT 2A receptor labeling is detected in monkey caudate, putamen, and accumbens. The cause of these cross-species differences remains to be elucidated. A phylogenetic explanation can be excluded because species closely related in evolutionary terms, such as primates (human and monkey) and rodents (rat, mouse, and guinea pig), often exhibit substantial differences with regard to the chemical neuroanatomy of their striatal 5-HT 2A receptors. These differences could have fundamental functional consequences and should be taken into account when evaluating drugs that interact with 5-HT 2A receptors, particularly when interpreting and comparing results obtained from behavioral pharmacology studies conducted using common laboratory species such as rat and mouse, or when extrapolating those results to human subjects.
HALLUCINOGENIC AND NON-HALLUCINOGENIC 5-HT 2A RECEPTOR AGONISTS
The mechanism of action of hallucinogens has attracted the attention of pharmacologists and neuroscientists for decades). These compounds elicit profound alterations of cognition, perception, and mood, and have been used by most human cultures for millennia. The role of the 5-HT 2A receptor in the mechanism of action of hallucinogens was first proposed by Richard Glennon, Milt Titeler and their teams). However, it was not until the development of 5-HT 2A knockout mice in 2003 that the fundamental role of 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent signaling in the cellular and behavioral effects of hallucinogens was verified conclusively. These findings in rodent models are further supported by studies conducted by Franz Vollenweider and his collaborators, which demonstrate that the psychosis-like effects of LSD and psilocybin in healthy volunteers are reversed by the 5-HT 2A receptor antagonist ketanserin. From a basic pharmacological perspective, it is particularly interesting that whereas all hallucinogens (such as LSD, mescaline, and psilocin) bind with high affinity and activate the serotonin 5-HT 2A receptor, certain closely related 5-HT 2A receptor agonists, such as lisuride and ergotamine, do not behave as hallucinogens in humans; indeed, these non-hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists are used as therapeutic drugs in the treatment of diseases such as migraine and Parkinson's disease (Fig.). Hallucinogenic and nonhallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists, therefore, serve as attractive pharmacological tools to investigate the molecular and signaling mechanisms that allow chemically related agonists to target the same receptor molecule but induce different neuropsychological effects. What might explain the differences between the neuropsychological effects of hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A agonists? Individual GPCRs can couple to multiple signal transduction pathways. It has been proposed that agonists can stabilize distinct active conformational receptor states). These active states can differ in their propensity to activate the various signaling proteins coupled to the receptor. This phenomenon of "biased agonism" explains how agonists acting at the same receptor target can elicit different patterns of cellular signaling responses. As briefly discussed above, the "ternary complex model"is the most widely accepted model of GPCR signaling. This model proposes that the receptor is in a dynamic equilibrium between the inactive (R) and the active (R*) conformational states. Based upon this model, neutral antagonists have identical affinities for the inactive and the active conformational states, whereas agonists exhibit higher affinity for the active state (Fig.). Because agonists have higher affinity for the active conformation of the receptor, agonist binding stabilizes GPCRs in their active state, shifting the dynamic equilibrium from R to R*. The ternary complex model was first proposed by Robert) and was based on radioligand binding assays in tissue culture plasma membrane preparations in which they showed that the β 2 -adrenergic receptor agonist hydroxybenzylisoproterenol displaced the β 2 -adrenergic receptor antagonist [ 3 H]dihydroalprenolol with a biphasic profile, with highaffinity (K H ) and low-affinity (K L ) binding sites. They also demonstrated that the fraction of binding sites with high affinity gradually decreased in the presence of increasing concentrations of the non-hydrolyzable GTP analog Gpp(NH)p. This model provided a general scheme for the agonist-induced activation of GPCRs and their effectors that has been widely used in pharmacology and drug development (Fig.). More recently, the theoretical pharmacologist Terry Kenakin proposed a model where GPCRs adopt multiple conformational states. According to this model, different agonists show a preference (in terms of binding affinity) for a subset of the receptor conformational states. Once these conformational states are stabilized by an agonist, the receptor modulates the activity of some, but not all, of the signaling pathways coupled to the receptor, consequently inducing an agonist-specific functional outcome (Fig.). This concept, first termed "agonist-directed trafficking of receptor signaling" and now known as "biased agonism", raised an enormous amount of interest in the molecular pharmacology field because it should theoretically be possible to design new drugs that specifically affect signaling pathways involved in the therapeutic response without inducing unwanted side effects. With this background, Kelly Berg, William Clarke, and their team tested the signal transduction pathways activated by a battery of serotonin 5-HT 2A receptor agonists in CHO-K1 cells). Importantly, their findings provided the first demonstration in heterologous expression systems that the relative efficacies of agonists can differ depending upon the signal transduction pathway that is measured. For example, relative to 5-HT, some agonists, such as 3-trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP), preferentially activate the PLC-IP pathway, whereas other agonists, such as LSD, showed a preference for the PLA 2 -AA pathway. These findings provided the basis for further in silico, in cellulo and in vivo investigations indicating that the different neuropsychological effects of hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists are likely linked to differences in the 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent signaling responses that they elicit.
BIASED AGONISM AT THE 5-HT 2A RECEPTOR
The best characterized 5-HT 2A receptor-coupled signaling pathway is G q/11 -mediated activation of PLC, leading to the formation of inositol phosphates and diacylglycerol, followed by Ca 2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum. However, whether this pathway plays a role in mediating the effects of hallucinogens is uncertain. Hallucinogens stimulate PLC-IP signaling with low efficacy, and there is no correlation between behavioral activity and the efficacy of the ligands in vitro and in cellulo. It has been demonstrated that head-twitch behavior induced by hallucinogens is absent in 5-HT 2A knockout mice) (see also. Importantly, however, it has been shown that the head-twitch response induced by the hallucinogen DOI is only slightly reduced in Gα q knockout mice compared to wild-type controls). Together, these findings suggest that although G qdependent signaling may contribute to the behavioral effects of hallucinogens in rodents, the G q pathway is not the only signaling cascade that is responsible for the hallucinogeninduced behavioral response. In addition to G q/11 -mediated PLC-IP signaling, studies in heterologous expression systems identified several other signaling transduction pathways that are coupled to the 5-HT 2A receptor, including phospholipase A 2 (PLA 2 ), PLA 2 -mediated arachidonic acid (AA) release, and G i/o -dependent Gβγ-associated activation of ERK1/2). The role of G i/o protein in hallucinogen-specific signaling is further supported by recent findings in heterologous expression systems and in mouse models. Most signaling pathways ultimately modulate gene expression in response to extracellular stimuli. It has been shown that GPCR activation can induce concentrationdependent changes in the level of expression of specific genes. To test the hypothesis that hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists modulate specific signaling pathways that are responsible for their behavioral effects, we relied on the quantification of changes in gene expression as a readout for multidimensional neuronal signaling. This approach was tested in HEK293 cells and in mouse somatosensory cortex, a region that has been implicated in the cellular and behavioral responses induced by hallucinogenic drugs. Importantly, each agonist studied elicited a reproducible and unique response in this signaling assay. Two transcripts (c-Fos and IκBα) were induced at a similar level by both hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic drugs. However, the transcripts Egr-1 and Egr-2 were consistently activated by hallucinogens (DOI, DOM, DOB, mescaline, LSD, and psilocin), but expression of these two genes was unaffected by non-hallucinogenic agonists (Rlisuride, S-lisuride and ergotamine). Additionally, with the exception of IκBα, the entire transcriptome fingerprint induced by the hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic agonists was abolished in somatosensory cortex of 5-HT 2A knockout mice. Together, these results indicate that both hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic agonists modulate neuronal signaling in somatosensory cortex via the 5-HT 2A receptor. Furthermore, the ability to predict behavioral activity based on intrinsic reporter profiles supports the existence of distinct 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent signaling responses that characterize the effects of hallucinogens in the brain. This hypothesis was tested in mouse cortical primary cultures in order to ascertain whether hallucinogens modulate specific 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent signaling pathways). Interestingly, it was demonstrated that while hallucinogenic and nonhallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists activate 5-HT 2A receptors that are coupled to PLC, hallucinogen-dependent responses also involve pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive heterotrimeric G i/o proteins). These findings revealed that hallucinogen-characteristic transcriptome fingerprint depends on modulation of both G q/11 and G i/o , and are consistent with the biased agonism model as it explains how distinct neurophysiological responses could be produced by hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists that target the same population of cortical pyramidal 5-HT 2A receptors. Notably, this hypothesis has been recently validated using a quantitative phosphoproteomic approach). Thus, it has been demonstrated that hallucinogenic and nonhallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists induce a distinct pattern of protein phosphorylation in HEK293 cells. Using this heterologous expression system, the authors also demonstrated that pretreatment with PTX abolishes ERK1,2 phosphorylation induced by the hallucinogens DOI and LSD, whereas PTX treatment did not affect the responses induced by the nonhallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists lisuride and ergotamine). Together with previous findings), these observations indicate that hallucinogens selectively activate G i/o -dependent signaling in vitro and in vivo, whereas non-hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists do not activate G i/o. These findings that were based upon the transcriptome fingerprint induced by hallucinogenic and non-hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists are highly relevant to the development of more specific therapeutic drugs. Indeed, induction of c-Fos, Egr-1, and Egr-1 in cortical regions is now widely used to investigate signaling events induced by hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A agonists in rodents. Although heterotrimeric G proteins represent one of the main mechanisms involved in GPCR-dependent responses, it has been demonstrated that G protein-independent mechanisms related to β-arrestin can also play a key role in their signaling properties (see above). The role of β-arrestins in GPCR function is further supported by the recent crystal structure of active β-arrestin-1 bound to a -derived carboxyl terminal). Additionally, using the 5-HT precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and the hallucinogen DOI, Laura Bohn and others working in her laboratory demonstrated that 5-HT induces the head-twitch response in mice by a β-arrestin-2-dependent mechanism, whereas the effect of DOI on this behavior is independent of β-arrestin-2. They also showed that 5-HT, but not DOI, activates a signaling cascade composed of β-arrestin-2, phosphoinositide 3-kinease, Src, and Akt that is responsible for head-twitch behavior. Interestingly, more recent findings by the same laboratory suggested that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine induces antipsychotic-like behavioral effects in mice by acting as a 5-HT 2A receptor agonist through a β-arrestin-2-independent activation of Akt. Further work is needed to delineate the roles of Akt and Src in the behavioral effects of 5-HTP, hallucinogens, and clozapine.
RECEPTOR
Recent findings have elucidated additional neuronal signaling pathways downstream from the 5-HT 2A receptor that is potentially involved in the unique behavioral effects induced by hallucinogens. It has been shown that the last four amino acids (VSCV) of the carboxyl terminus of the 5-HT 2A receptor constitute a canonical Type I PDZ-binding domain (X-Ser/Thr-X-ϕ). PDZ-binding domains are known to physically interact with PSD-95/ Discs-large/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain-containing proteins such as postsynaptic density 95 (PSD-95), which is a prototypic member. Co-immunoprecipitation studies suggested that the wild-type 5-HT 2A receptor, but not a mutant lacking the last four amino acids of the carboxyl terminus, interacts directly with PSD-95. It was also demonstrated that the association with PSD-95 enhanced 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent G q/11 -coupling, and that this augmentation was accompanied by inhibition of agonist-induced 5-HT 2A receptor internalization. 5-HT 2A receptor-mediated head-twitch behavior is reduced and the 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent induction of genes such as c-Fos, Egr-1 and Period-1 is disrupted in PSD-95 knockout mice). These results suggest that PSD-95 is essential for hallucinogen actions at the 5-HT 2A receptor. Additionally, findings based on a proteomic approach that combined affinity chromatography using an immobilized synthetic PDZ ligand with mass spectrometry demonstrated that the 5-HT 2A receptor carboxyl terminus interacts with specific PDZ proteins in vitro and in vivo. These results indicate that the 5-HT 2A receptor is associated with protein networks that are important for its synaptic localization and coupling to signaling machinery. Cellular responses induced by cytokines and growth factors are mediated by the evolutionary conserved Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway. In addition to this integral component of the signaling system, it has been reported that desen-sitization of 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent signaling is accompanied by activation of STAT3 and an increase in RGS7 protein in rat frontal cortex. It was also found that the 5-HT 2A receptor and STAT3 coprecipitate with JAK2, indicating that they are part of the same protein complex. Because the hallucinogen DOI activates both the MEK-ERK1/2 and JAK2-STAT3 intracellular signaling pathways, it is tempting to speculate that these signal transduction pathways play a role in regulating the effects induced by hallucinogen 5-HT 2A agonists. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein (5 μM) decreased the potency of DOI-induced contraction of rat aorta, whereas this effect did not occur with daidzein (5 μM), which is the inactive isomer of genistein. In cultured aortic smooth muscle cells, activation of the 5-HT 2A receptor stimulated tyrosine-phosphorylation of ERK, and this effect was reduced by the MAPK inhibitor PD098059 (10 μM). Together, these results suggest that hallucinogens cause rat aortic contraction via a pathway that is at least partially independent of the pathways classically associated with the 5-HT 2A receptor. A specific conserved motif, NPxxY, which is found at the junction between TM7 and the carboxyl terminal domains of a number of rhodopsin-like GPCRs, including the 5-HT 2A receptor, has been implicated as a determinant of ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF)-mediated signaling because wild-type receptors with an alternative DPxxY motif show selective defects in this pathway. Although as described above, the 5-HT 2A receptor is known to activate PLC via the heterotrimeric G protein G q/11 , previous findings have convincingly demonstrated that the 5-HT 2A receptor can also signal through the PLD pathway independent of G q/11 in an ARF-dependent manner. Both coimmunoprecipitation assays and the effect of negative mutant ARF constructs on 5-HT 2A receptor-induced PLD activation demonstrate that ARF1 plays a key role in the function of this receptor. The N376PxxY motif in TM7 was shown to be essential for ARF-dependent PLD signaling and co-immunoprecipitation with ARF1. In addition, ARF1 rather that ARF6 participates in this mechanism through a GTP-dependent interaction with the carboxyl terminus of the 5-HT 2A receptor. It has also been reported that the spatial coordination of the 5-HT 2A receptor with transducer and effector proteins into a physical complex is likely to reinforce the impact of receptor activation on G protein-independent signaling pathway. By visualizing GFP-tagged 5-HT 2A receptors in living cells, it has been shown that activation of protein kinase C (PKC) by its specific activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate leads to internalization of the receptor in the absence of 5-HT. Additionally, inhibition of PKC with sphingosine prevents internalization of the 5-HT 2A receptor by 5-HT. Because receptors that had been internalized by phorbol 12myristate 13-acetate exposure in the absence of 5-HT also recycle to the cell surface with a time-course comparable to that seen after activation of the 5-HT 2A receptor by 5-HT, these findings suggest that 5-HT 2A receptors internalize and return to the cell surface in response to both 5-HT and PKC. Although the human and rat 5-HT 2A receptors differ by only a few amino acids, the human receptor takes longer to recycle to the cell surface after internalization. Further investigation based upon the comparison of the primary sequences of human and rat 5-HT 2A receptors demonstrated that replacing serine 457 in the carboxyl terminus of the human isoform with alanine resulted in faster recycling. By extension, this study also indicates that extrapolating results from non-human receptor isoforms may sometimes lead to misinterpretations. It is well accepted that protein kinases mediate many of the downstream actions of both ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. Interestingly, relatively recent findings suggest that genetic deletion of p90 ribosomal S6 kinase 2 (RSK2) potentiates 5-HT 2A receptordependent signaling. Thus, studies of 5-HT 2A receptor signaling in fibroblasts obtained from wild-type and RSK2 knockout mice demonstrated that 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent phosphoinositide hydrolysis is augmented in RSK2 knockout fibroblasts. Several lines of evidence have shown that 5-HT 1A and 5-HT 2A receptors, which are coexpressed in cortical pyramidal neurons, often show opposite effects on common signaling pathways. It has been demonstrated that activation of 5-HT 1A receptors suppresses NMDA receptor function in frontal cortex pyramidal neurons. Most importantly, activation of 5-HT 2A receptors by hallucinogens significantly attenuates the effect of 5-HT 1A receptor on NMDA receptor currents and microtubule depolymerization. Inhibition of the β-arrestin/Src/dynamin signaling was shown to block 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent activation of ERK and the counteractive effect of 5-HT 2A on 5-HT 1A -dependent regulation of NMDA receptor currents. These findings could be important for cognitive control-a function known to be heavily influenced by hallucinogens and the 5-HT 2A receptor. DARPP-32 is a key regulator of kinase-phosphatase signaling cascades modulated by serotonergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic neurotransmission. Four distinct phosphorylation sites determine the function of DARPP-32. Phosphorylation at Thr 34 converts DARPP-32 into a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1 (PP1). Phosphorylated Ser 97 increases the ability of protein kinase A (PKA) to phosphorylate DARPP-32 at Thr 34 . Phosphorylation of Ser 130 prevents the dephos-phorylation of Thr 34 by protein phosphatase-2B (PP2B). Phosphorylation of Thr 75 converts DARPP-32 into an inhibitor of PKA. Dopaminergic agonists, such as (+)-amphetamine, serotonergic 5-HT 2A agonists such as LSD, and glutamatergic antagonists such as phencyclidine (PCP), have all been shown to induce phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of DARPP-32 at three sites in a pattern predicted to cause a synergistic inhibition of protein PP1 and concomitant regulation of its downstream effector proteins GSK-3, cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), and c-Fos. Notably, in mice with point mutations at DARPP-32 phosphorylation sites, the effects of (+)amphetamine, LSD, and PCP on sensorimotor gating and repetitive movements are strongly attenuated. Thus, three pathways that regulate the state of phosphorylation of Thr 34 -, Thr 75 -, and Ser 130 -DARPP-32 inhibit PP1, which leads to increased phosphorylation of various PP1 substrates. Further work will be needed to identify the precise PP1 substrates involved in the psychoactive behavioral effects of these drugs. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) are members of the neurotrophin family, a small family of secreted proteins that also includes nerve growth factor (NGF), neurotrophin 3 (NT-3), and neurotrophin 4 (NT-4). Administration of DOI induces a differential regulation BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus and neocortex, with downregulation in hippocampus and upregulation in neocortex. This interesting effect is blocked by selective 5-HT 2A antagonists but is unaffected by selective 5-HT 2C antagonists. Additionally, the mGlu2/3 receptor agonist LY354740 dose-dependently represses the ability of DOI to induce upregulation of BDNF mRNA expression in rat frontal cortex, whereas the effect of DOI is enhanced by the mGlu2/3 receptor antagonist LY341495. Immobilization stress also decreases the expression of BDNF mRNA in rat hippocampus, an effect that is blocked by the 5-HT 2A receptor antagonist MDL100,907. These results suggest that 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent signaling is involved in the stress-induced regulation of BDNF expression in the rat hippocampus. Given that the mGlu2/3 receptor agonist LY354740 suppresses the effect of immobilization stress on BDNF mRNA expression), these results are consistent with the hypothesis that mGlu2/3 receptor agonists may modulate 5-HT 2A receptor-dependent stressinduced behaviors.
ROLE OF MGLU2 RECEPTOR IN HALLUCINOGEN ACTION
Although it is generally accepted that the 5-HT 2A receptor expressed in frontal cortical pyramidal neurons represents the main molecular target responsible for the cellular, electrophysiological and behavioral effects of hallucinogens in rodents, effects on sub-cortical regions such as thalamocortical projections may also contribute. Relatively recent findings demonstrate that the mGlu2/3 receptor agonist LY354740 antagonizes 5-HT 2A receptor-induced excitatory postsynaptic potential/currents (EPSPs/EPSCs) in pyramidal neurons. It was also shown that LY354740 suppresses the head-twitch behavior induced by the hallucinogen DOI. Similar effects have been observed with mGlu2/3 receptor agonists such as LY379268 and LY404030. These findings led to the conclusion that activation of mGlu2 autoreceptors mediates the presynaptic effects of mGlu2/3 agonists in suppressing the electrophysiological effects of hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonists recorded in cortical pyramidal neurons. An alternative (although not mutually exclusive) explanation for the crosstalk between 5-HT 2A and mGlu2 receptors is that these two receptors may be expressed in close physical proximity in the postsynaptic density of cortical pyramidal neurons. Traditionally, GPCRs were thought to function as monomers. The monomeric function of GPCRs is supported by assays that measured agonist binding and G protein coupling of purified receptors reconstituted into a lipid bilayer (including rhodopsin, β 2 -adrenergic and μ-opioid receptors)). Nevertheless, many instances of homomerization and heteromerization (macromolecular complexes formed by non-covalent interactions between GPCRs) have recently been reported (Gonzalez-Maeso 2011;. The existence of GPCR heteromers is further suggested by the recent explosion of research elucidating the crystal structures of GPCRs; for example, four crystal structures that were recently reported (CXCR4, μ-opioid, κ-opioid, and β 1 -adrenergic receptors) contained receptor dimers. Interestingly, previous findings suggest that the G q/11 -coupled 5-HT 2A receptor and the G i/o -coupled mGlu2 receptor form a specific GPCR heteromeric complex in heterologous expression systems, as well as in mouse and human frontal cortex); these results have been independently confirmed by other groups). The close molecular proximity between 5-HT 2A and mGlu2 receptors does not occur with the closely related G i/o -coupled mGlu3 receptor, and is either rescued or disrupted with different mGlu2/mGlu3 chimeric constructs. The conclusion that 5-HT 2A and mGlu2 receptors are co-expressed as a GPCR heteromeric complex in frontal cortex is supported by observations that demonstrate the co-expression and co-immunoprecipitation of these receptors in mouse and human frontal cortex, as well as by the close physical proximity of 5-HT 2A and mGlu2 receptors at cortical synaptic junctions at the electron microscopy level) (Fig.). The role of mGlu2 in the psychoactive effects induced by hallucinogens is supported by the impaired ability of the hallucinogens DOI and LSD to induce head-twitch behavior in mGlu2 knockout mice compared to wild-type littermates (Figs.and). It has been demonstrated that the ability of DOI to induce head-twitch behavior in mGlu2 knockout mice is rescued by over-expressing mGlu2 in frontal cortex using a viral (HSV)-mediated transgene expression approach. Because DOI-induced head-twitch behavior is not rescued in mGlu2 knockout mice over-expressing mGlu2∆TM4N [a mGlu2/mGlu3 chimeric construct that does not form heteromers with the 5-HT 2A receptor] in frontal cortex, these findings suggest that the 5-HT 2A -mGlu2 receptor complex is critical for the hallucinogen-like behaviors induced by 5-HT 2A receptor agonists (Figs.and). The translational potential of these findings is suggested by the alterations in the expression of 5-HT 2A and mGlu2 receptors in the frontal cortex of schizophrenic subjects postmortem). However, further investigation of this heteromeric receptor complex is definitely necessary because the functional significance of GPCR homo-and heteromerization remains a controversial topic[in addition, see:,].
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
In conclusion, recent work suggests that hallucinogens may be unique in their ability to modulate the activity of specific 5-HT 2A receptor-linked signaling pathways. Hallucinogens are used recreationally; hence, elucidating their biophysical and molecular mechanism of action is an important objective in drug abuse research. However, clinical studies also suggest that hallucinogens, when administered under medical supervision, may serve as therapeutic drugs that can be used for the treatment of severe psychiatric and neurological disorders such as alcoholism, obsessive compulsive disorder, and cluster headache. Further basic and translational research is therefore warranted to better define the specific signaling and neuronal circuit mechanisms responsible for their psychoactive effects. The ternary complex model. According to this model, the receptor in its inactive state (R) undergoes a conformational transition, which leads to the formation of an active state (R*). This active state in turn interacts with heterotrimeric G proteins (G). Note that according to this model, the relative degree of activation of each effector pathway by the tested agonists must be the same Model of biased agonism. Selective agonists stabilize a subset of receptor conformations that selectively activates some but not all signaling pathways. Recent findings suggest that biased agonism is involved in the psychoactive differences between hallucinogen and closely related non-hallucinogen 5-HT 2A receptor agonists a Head-twitch behavior induced by DOI and LSD is absent in mGlu2 knockout mice (see. b, c Expression of 5-HT 2A and mGlu2 as a GPCR heteromer is necessary for head-twitch psychosis-like behavior induced by hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A agonists in mice (see. Representative image of HSV-mediated transgene expression in mouse frontal cortex. Scale bar, 200 μm (b). Virally mediated over-expression of wild-type mGlu2, but not the mGlu2/mGlu3 chimeric construct mGlu2∆TM4 N that does not form the 5-HT 2A -mGlu2 heteromeric receptor complex, rescues the head-twitch behavior induced by the hallucinogenic 5-HT 2A receptor agonist DOI (c) Model of the mechanism underlying hallucinogen-induced head-twitch behavioral response
Full Text PDF
Study Details
- Study Typemeta
- Populationrodentshumans
- Characteristicsliterature review
- Journal