Altered brain activity and functional connectivity after MDMA-assisted therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder
In nine veterans and first‑responders with chronic PTSD, fMRI before and two months after MDMA‑assisted therapy showed reduced trauma‑related cuneus activation and clinical improvement that correlated with changes in connectivity involving the left amygdala (bilateral PCC and left insula) and left isthmus cingulate–left posterior hippocampus, with a trend toward increased left amygdala–left hippocampus resting connectivity. These preliminary findings indicate MDMA‑AT modulates amygdala–hippocampus–insula networks implicated in PTSD recovery but require replication and comparison with other treatments.
Authors
- Rick Doblin
- Berra Yazar-Klosinski
- Michael Mithoefer
Published
Abstract
ABSTRACT 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has demonstrated promise in multiple clinical trials. MDMA is hypothesized to facilitate the therapeutic process, in part, by decreasing fear response during fear memory processing while increasing extinction learning. The acute administration of MDMA in healthy controls modifies recruitment of brain regions involved in the hyperactive fear response in PTSD such as the amygdala, hippocampus, and insula. However, to date there have been no neuroimaging studies aimed at directly elucidating the neural impact of MDMA-AT in PTSD patients. We analyzed brain activity and connectivity via functional MRI during both rest and autobiographical memory (trauma and neutral) response before and two-months after MDMA-AT in nine veterans and first-responders with chronic PTSD of 6 months or more. We hypothesized that MDMA-AT would increase amygdala-hippocampus resting-state functional connectivity, however we only found evidence of a trend in the left amygdala – left hippocampus ( t = -2.91, uncorrected p = 0.0225, corrected p = 0.0901). We also found reduced activation contrast (trauma > neutral) after MDMA-AT in the cuneus. Finally, the amount of recovery from PTSD after MDMA-AT correlated with changes in four functional connections during autobiographical memory recall: the left amygdala – left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), left amygdala – right PCC, left amygdala – left insula, and left isthmus cingulate – left posterior hippocampus. Amygdala – insular functional connectivity is reliably implicated in PTSD and anxiety, and both regions are impacted by MDMA administration. These findings compliment previous research indicating that amygdala, hippocampus, and insula functional connectivity is a potential target of MDMA-AT, and highlights other regions of interest related to memory processes. More research is necessary to determine if these findings are specific to MDMA-AT compared to other types of treatment for PTSD. This study: NCT02102802 Parent-study: NCT01211405
Research Summary of 'Altered brain activity and functional connectivity after MDMA-assisted therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder'
Introduction
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a disabling condition characterised by heightened fear responses and intrusive re-experiencing of traumatic memories, with lifetime prevalence around 8% in the general population and substantially higher rates in military personnel (about 17.1%) and first responders (10–32%). Standard trauma-focused psychotherapies produce clinically meaningful improvements for many patients but have high non-remission and dropout rates, motivating investigation of adjunctive pharmacological approaches. 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) has shown promise in Phase II and III trials and is hypothesised to facilitate therapy by reducing fear responses, enhancing prosocial behaviour and supporting extinction and reconsolidation of emotional memories via serotonergic and other neuromodulatory mechanisms. This study set out to characterise the neural correlates of MDMA-AT in people with chronic PTSD. Doss and colleagues examined changes in regional brain activation and functional connectivity (FC) using task and resting-state fMRI collected before and two months after MDMA-AT in veterans and first responders. The investigators pre-specified hypotheses that MDMA-AT would increase resting-state FC between the amygdala and hippocampus, and that trauma-related autobiographical memory recall would evoke greater activation than neutral recall at baseline with a reduced trauma>neutral contrast after treatment. They also planned exploratory analyses correlating FC changes with clinical improvement measured by CAPS-IV total severity scores.
Methods
This report analysed an MRI sub-study nested within a Phase II randomised, double-blind, dose–response trial of MDMA-AT in veterans and first responders with chronic, moderate-to-severe PTSD. Participants from the parent trial could opt into the MRI sub-study after providing informed consent; additional MRI safety screening applied. Ten participants enrolled, one withdrew after baseline owing to scanner anxiety, leaving nine with paired task-fMRI data and eight with complete resting-state data (one resting scan was truncated). All subjects had PTSD of at least six months' duration; demographic details were reported in supplementary material. Dosing in the parent trial included low (30 mg), medium (75 mg) and high (125 mg) MDMA arms with preparatory and integration psychotherapy sessions. For the MRI sub-study analyses the investigators focused on pre-treatment (baseline) and a follow-up scan collected approximately two months after each participant’s final high-dose MDMA session; follow-up scans were obtained after the blind was broken and some participants had crossed over to the high-dose condition. A personalised script-driven autobiographical memory paradigm generated two six-minute audio recordings per participant (one trauma, one neutral), each split into two 2.95-minute blocks. During task-fMRI participants saw a visual cue to “allow” and listened to alternated neutral and trauma blocks in a fixed order (neutral, trauma, neutral, trauma) with brief rest periods. MRI acquisition used a 3T Siemens system: T1-weighted anatomical scans, two identical task fMRI runs (TR/TE = 2,200/35 ms, 3.0 mm isotropic voxels, ~14:25 min each) and a single resting-state run (TR/TE = 2,000/30 ms, ~5:00 min). Image preprocessing combined FreeSurfer segmentation and FSL steps (brain extraction, registration, slice-timing, motion correction, high-pass filtering), with further denoising for FC analyses including bandpass filtering, regression of 24 motion confounds, nuisance WM/CSF regressors and global GM signal (global signal regression was used in the main analyses; supplemental analyses without it were also reported). High-motion frames (>0.9 mm relative framewise displacement) and other outlier volumes were scrubbed; mean motion did not differ between baseline and follow-up for rest or task scans. Activation analyses used FSL FEAT GLMs on smoothed task data to estimate neutral, trauma and trauma>neutral contrasts, with nuisance regressors (derivatives, WM/CSF, motion, outlier volumes). Group-level voxelwise tests employed permutation inference with threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) and a two-sided paired design for baseline-versus-follow-up contrasts, correcting for multiple comparisons via TFCE at alpha = 0.05. Resting-state FC between bilateral amygdalae and hippocampi (and hippocampal head/tail subregions in supplemental analyses) was computed as Fisher Z-transformed Pearson correlations; two-tailed paired t-tests compared pre-to-post values. Task FC used Fisher Z correlations across 18 ROIs (hippocampus head/tail, amygdala, precuneus, caudal/rostral ACC, PCC, isthmus cingulate, insula) extracted from the Desikan–Killiany atlas, averaging the two task runs per session. Changes in FC were correlated (Pearson) with individual reductions in CAPS-IV total severity scores, with age and mean FD change as covariates. Statistical tests used alpha = 0.05 and Benjamini–Hochberg false-discovery rate correction where indicated.
Results
Nine participants contributed paired task-fMRI data (6 male, 3 female; mean age 41.3 ± 10.9 years; 8 veterans, 1 first responder), and eight had usable resting-state data. Baseline CAPS-IV total severity scores averaged 86 ± 16 and decreased to 39 ± 25 at two-month follow-up, a statistically significant reduction (N = 9, t = 6.36, p = 0.00022) corresponding to a mean percent decrease of 57% ± 26%. Resting-state analyses showed a general trend toward increased amygdala–hippocampus FC after therapy across examined connections. The left amygdala–left hippocampus connection demonstrated a significant increase before correction (N = 8, t = -2.91, uncorrected p = 0.0225) but this effect did not survive FDR correction (pFDR = 0.0901). One correlation between change in right amygdala–left hippocampus FC and CAPS reduction reached significance before correction (N = 8, R = -0.820, uncorrected p = 0.0460) but not after correction (pFDR = 0.183). Whole-brain activation contrasts (trauma > neutral) at baseline showed greater activation magnitude in several regions involved in autobiographical memory and self-referential processing; following TFCE correction four clusters were significant at baseline. At the two-month follow-up no significant trauma>neutral clusters remained. The direct longitudinal contrast (baseline > follow-up) revealed a significant decrease in the trauma>neutral contrast in a bilateral cluster encompassing the cuneus and lingual gyrus. Task functional connectivity comparisons between baseline and follow-up identified a single connection—right amygdala to left caudal ACC—as nominally increased at follow-up (N = 9, t = 3.04, p = 0.0148), but this did not survive FDR correction (pFDR = 0.9875). Correlations between individual FC changes during the task and CAPS-IV reductions produced four statistically robust associations after correction: reductions in FC between the left amygdala and left PCC (N = 9, R = 0.951, pFDR = 0.0462), left amygdala and right PCC (N = 9, R = 0.972, pFDR = 0.0197), left amygdala and left insula (N = 9, R = 0.977, pFDR = 0.0197), and left isthmus cingulate and left hippocampal tail (N = 9, R = 0.947, pFDR = 0.0462). In most cases larger reductions in task FC were associated with larger clinical improvements. Supplemental analyses using hippocampal subregions showed uncorrected increases in left hippocampal head–left amygdala and left hippocampal tail–right amygdala RSFC, but these did not survive multiple-comparisons correction. Secondary outcome measures (BDI-II, PSQI, PTGI, DES-II, GAF) produced no significant FC correlations after correction. Replicating main analyses without global signal regression yielded similar trends, and the left amygdala–left insula task FC correlation with CAPS reductions remained significant both with and without global signal regression (N = 9; R = 0.971, pFDR = 0.0229).
Discussion
Doss and colleagues report converging preliminary neuroimaging signatures associated with clinically meaningful decreases in PTSD symptoms after MDMA-AT. The sub-study replicated the parent trial’s clinical effect: CAPS-IV scores fell substantially at two months. Neurobiologically, the investigators observed a trend toward increased resting-state amygdala–hippocampus connectivity after therapy—most notably in the left hemisphere—although this effect did not survive correction for multiple comparisons and therefore is presented as suggestive rather than conclusive. The authors note this trend aligns with prior work implicating amygdala–hippocampus coupling in contextualisation of affect and recovery from stress, and with acute MDMA effects reported in healthy volunteers. Analyses of task activation during personalised trauma versus neutral audio revealed greater activation in regions tied to self-referential processing, episodic memory retrieval and visual imagery at baseline, with the trauma>neutral contrast diminished at follow-up; a bilateral cuneus/lingual gyrus cluster showed a significant longitudinal decrease. The investigators interpret reduced cuneus contrast as potentially reflecting decreased intensity of visual imagery during traumatic memory recollection after MDMA-AT. Functional connectivity during the autobiographical memory task did not show group-level pre-to-post changes after correction, but individual-level reductions in several connections correlated strongly with PTSD symptom improvement: left amygdala to bilateral PCC, left amygdala to left insula, and left isthmus cingulate to left hippocampal tail. The authors relate these findings to literature linking amygdala–insula and amygdala–cingulate connectivity with anxiety, re-experiencing, and PTSD severity, and to acute MDMA effects on PCC and insula connectivity observed in healthy subjects. The study team emphasised several limitations that temper interpretation: the small sample size, absence of a non-MDMA control or trauma-exposed healthy control group, and the fact that follow-up scans were collected after the blind was broken and dose crossover had occurred. They note heterogeneity in PTSD subtypes and sex differences were not addressed, CAPS-IV relies on an index trauma which may shift during therapy, and the personalised script task presents stimuli that are not time-locked across participants and were not counterbalanced, introducing potential primacy or fatigue confounds. Short resting-state scan duration (about 5 minutes) reduces FC reliability, and some analyses were added after data collection in response to emerging literature. Taken together, the authors present these results as preliminary evidence pointing to candidate neural mechanisms of MDMA-AT—particularly involving amygdala–hippocampus and amygdala–insula/PCC interactions—while calling for larger, controlled studies to confirm specificity to MDMA and to disentangle effects of the drug from psychotherapy components.
Conclusion
In this small MRI sub-study of veterans and first responders with chronic, moderate-to-severe PTSD, MDMA-assisted therapy was associated with large clinical symptom reductions and with preliminary changes in brain activation and functional connectivity. The investigators observed trends toward strengthened left amygdala–left hippocampus resting connectivity and reductions in trauma>neutral activation in visual imagery regions (cuneus/lingual gyrus). Importantly, reductions in task-based FC between the left amygdala and PCC/insula, and between the isthmus cingulate and posterior hippocampus, co-varied strongly with clinical improvement. The authors conclude these findings are tentative but consistent with the hypothesis that MDMA-AT modulates limbic and default-mode network circuitry implicated in fear, autobiographical memory and self-referential processing; they call for larger, controlled studies to replicate and to determine which effects are specific to MDMA versus to psychotherapy.
View full paper sections
CONCLUSION
We report signatures of brain response during rest and audio listening task in eight veterans and one first-responder with clinically diagnosed chronic and severe PTSD before and two-months after MDMA-assisted therapy. We found a significant reduction in CAPS-IV total severity scores after therapy (Figure), indicating our sub-study participants mirrored the results from the parent study. We found a trend suggesting that RSFC between the amygdala and hippocampus was strengthened post-therapy, particularly in the left hemisphere (Figure). Prior work suggests that modulation of amygdalae-hippocampal RSFC may be an important component of MDMA-AT for PTSD, thus investigating this connection in future studies is warranted. We also found participants had increased activation in areas involved with self-referential processing and autobiographical memory while listening to traumatic versus neutral memory narrations pre-therapy (Figures), and that no significant contrast existed after MDMA-AT (Figure). Comparing trauma versus neutral contrasts between baseline and followup revealed a significant decrease in cuneus contrast after MDMA-AT (Figure). Finally, the pre-to post-therapy reductions in FC during the script listening task between the left amygdala and right PCC, left PCC, and left insula, as well as FC between the left isthmus cingulate and left hippocampal tail strongly and significantly correlated with PTSD symptom improvement (Figure). These results begin to shed light on the neurological mechanisms that may drive MDMA-AT for PTSD. Previous work quantifying functional connectivity in PTSD and in stress exposureand acute MDMA administration in controlssuggests one mechanism of MDMA-AT may be to increase pathologically lowered amygdala-hippocampal RSFC. The amygdala is associated with fear expression, threat recognition, and heightened response to emotional memories and is often dysregulated in patients with PTSD. The hippocampus also plays a central role in PTSD as it is thought to provide contextual information important for cognitive-affect during memory recollection. Sripada et al.found combat veterans with PTSD had reduced amygdala-hippocampal RSFC compared to combat-exposed controls, leading them to speculate that this may relate to an inability to contextualize affective information in PTSD. Carhart-Harris et al.demonstrated that amygdala-hippocampal RSFC is increased acutely in MDMA administration compared to placebo and this increase occurred in a manner that correlated with the drug's subjective effects at a near-significant level, leading these researchers to propose that this functional connection was a primary target of MDMA-AT. Increased amygdalahippocampal RSFC has also been linked to intranasal oxytocin administration after stress exposureand this effect was mediated by serotonin signaling (55)-two neuromodulators that play a significant role in the pro-social and fear extinction effects of MDMA. Prior to our analysis (although after the study was designed and the data collected), we hypothesized that the RSFC between the amygdala and hippocampus would be higher after MDMA-AT compared to pre-therapy levels. Only the RSFC between the left amygdala and left hippocampus was significantly increased (Figure) however, this finding no longer met thresholds for significance after multiple comparisons correction (pFDR = 0.09). We also found that the amount of increased right amygdalaleft hippocampal RSFC after MDMA-AT positively correlated with PTSD symptom improvement at a near-significant level (Supplementary Figure; R = -0.820, uncorrected p = 0.046, pFDR = 0.183). Our current findings, though inconclusive, are suggestive of a trend toward moderate increases in amygdalahippocampal RSFC two-months after MDMA-AT. It is possible that more significant changes would have been observed with a larger sample size, longer resting-state scans, or imaging performed closer to MDMA administration. These findings justify the continued investigation of amygdala-hippocampal RSFC in the therapeutic mechanisms of MDMA-AT in future studies. We next sought to study brain response during autobiographical memory listening to draw additional conclusions about MDMA-AT's effects in individuals with PTSD. Before therapy, participants had larger activation in four areas during an individualized trauma script listening task compared to neutral script listening: the right and left isthmus cingulate and precuneus, the left caudal middle frontal gyrus, the right medial prefrontal cortex, and the left rostral middle frontal gyrus (Figures). These regions are broadly involved in self-processing operations (e.g., first-person perspective taking), episodic memory retrieval, visual-spatial imagery, auto-biographical memory recollection, and are included in or interact with the default mode network. The retrosplenial cortex-located within the isthmus cingulate-is also found to be consistently activated by emotionally salient stimuli, and has been proposed to play a role in the interaction between emotion and memory. We conjecture that increased activation in these regions during traumatic compared to neutral audio listening (Figures) could be related to an increased intensity of the recollection or re-experiencing of traumatic memories compared to neutral ones for patients before therapy. At 2-month follow-up to MDMA-AT, there was no significant difference in the trauma vs neutral script activation (Figure). The longitudinal comparison of these two time points indicated that the contrast between trauma and neutral was larger at baseline, particularly in a significant cluster in the right and left cuneus/lingual gyrus (Figure). Cuneus activity during autobiographical memory tasks often coincides with activity in the frontal regions highlighted by the baseline contrast, and has been found to correlate with memory recall accuracy. Cuneus activity is thought to enhance the visual imagery of autobiographical memory recollection, therefore decreased contrast in this area at follow-up suggests that intensity of visual imagery contrast between trauma and neutral memories may be decreased after MDMA-AT. Larger studies may allow more statistical power to identify additional longitudinal differences. Other longitudinal studies of individuals with PTSD have found that decreases in precuneus, isthmus cingulate, and middle frontal gyrus activation during symptom provocation is correlated with reductions in PTSD symptom severity. PTSD is often associated with hyperactivity in the amygdala (36); the acute administration of MDMA in healthy volunteers decreases blood flow to the amygdala during restand attenuates its response to angry faces. We had hypothesized that we would observe hyperactivity of the amygdala to trauma versus neutral scripts at baseline and that MDMA-AT would attenuate this response, however we observed neither. It is important to note inconsistencies in the literature here. Amygdala hyperactivity in PTSD is not always observed, possibly due to differences in subtypes, sex, cultural representations, or choice of paradigm. Additionally, while MDMA did suppress amygdala activity during rest and in response to angry faces as previously mentioned, there was no observed impact on its response to autobiographical memories. While activation-based analyses deserve continued attention in future studies to rectify these inconsistencies, functional connectivity is a complimentary approach we can use to extract additional information from fMRI. Functional connectivity analyses in individuals with PTSD have revealed aberrant connectivity between several regions within default mode, limbic, and salience networks, and more broadly, regions involved in emotional and selfreferential processing, and, further, the administration of MDMA in healthy volunteers has been shown to disrupt the functional integrity of these networks. Here, we measured functional connectivity during scriptdriven autobiographical memory recall between the right and left hippocampus head, hippocampus tail, amygdala, precuneus, caudal ACC, rostral ACC, PCC, isthmus cingulate, and the insula. Our ROIs were defined and labeled based on the Desikan-Killiany (DK) brain atlas (Supplementary Figures). We chose to segment the hippocampus into anterior (head) and posterior (tail) ROIs based on recent work showing that the two portions' FC are differentially effected by PTSD. We assessed group-level changes in the strength of these functional connections and found no significant differences between baseline and follow-up after corrections for multiple comparisons (Figure). However, we did find that greater recovery (larger decreases in CAPS-IV at follow-up) was associated with reductions in FC between the left amygdala and the right and left PCC, as well as the left insula (Figure). The acute effects of MDMA in healthy volunteers has been shown to decrease the FC of the PCCand insula, and alter amygdala and hippocampus FC, highlighting the potential relevance of our current findings. Amygdala to posterior and mid-cingulate cortex FC has been shown to be associated with PTSD severity at different stages of disease progression, although differing patient populations and assessment timelines lead to conflicting results. One finding in healthy adults shows increased amygdala-PCC FC following the acute exposure to stress (103), thus the association between recovery and reduced amygdala-PCC task FC at follow-up possibly relates to reduced stress response to trauma memories (although the finding by Veer and colleagues is more posterior to the ROI used here). Amygdala and insula RSFC is increased in PTSD[except in one study which finds the opposite], and reduced amygdala-insula FC during negative image reappraisal is associated with larger improvements in PTSD symptoms (101). The strength of left amygdala-insula FC also positively correlates with the amount of acute anxiety measured in participants just before scanning (104). Attenuated functional connectivity of these two regions at follow-up in the present study possibly suggests a decreased intensity of recalled events, less "re-experiencing, " or reduced anxiety during the scriptdriven memory recall. Lastly, we found that reductions in CAPS-IV at follow-up were associated with reduced FC between the left isthmus cingulate and left hippocampal tail (Figure). The isthmus cingulate labeled here consists of the most posterior potions of the PCC (Supplementary Figure). Increased FC between these two regions has previously been reported in PTSD patients compared to trauma-exposed health controls, and the present finding is possibly indicative of changes in memory contextualization and reduced threat sensitivity at two-month follow-up to MDMA-AT compared to baseline (100). PTSD is characterized by decreased fear extinction in response to trauma-related stimuli. One possible mechanism through which MDMA-AT operates is enhanced reconsolidation and/or fear extinction processes. Several studies with MDMA implicate reconsolidation or fear extinction processes, and while it is currently unclear whether MDMA acts on only one or both, it is important to note that the two interact (105). Rodent models have demonstrated that the administration of MDMA prior to extinction learning enhances extinction retention (tested 48 h after learning) and this effect is blocked by acute and chronic treatment with a serotonin transporter inhibitor (20, 106). Hake et al. (107) found that MDMA administered during extinction learning phases did not enhance fear extinction memory, while MDMA administration during reconsolidation phases resulted in prolonged reductions in conditioned fear. In addition, MDMA administered prior to trauma-cue exposure (reconsolidation phase) in rodents resulted in reduced stress-related behavioral responses 7 days later (108). Two recent trials in healthy humans found that MDMA (100 and 125 mg, respectively) administered prior to extinction learning resulted in improved extinction learning at extinction recall phases (48 and 24 h later, respectively) compared to the placebo group. Doss et al.found that 1 mg/kg of MDMA in healthy humans attenuated the encoding and retrieval of salient details from positive and negative stimuli (but not neutral stimuli), suggesting an ability for MDMA to alter emotional memory representation. Interestingly, a fMRI study in healthy humans found decreased activation in the precuneus/PCC during fear extinction learning (109), regions highlighted by our present study and others in PTSD.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsfollow upre analysisbrain measures
- Journal
- Compounds
- Topics
- Authors