Does getting high hurt? Characterization of cases of LSD and psilocybin-containing mushroom exposures to national poison centers between 2000 and 2016
Retrospective analysis of 2000–2016 US poison centre reports found LSD and psilocybin‑containing mushroom exposures occurred mainly in 13–29‑year‑olds and typically caused mild-to-moderate effects (hallucinations, agitation, tachycardia). Serious outcomes were uncommon but did occur, and LSD exposures were more likely than psilocybin to require hospital admission.
Authors
- Klein-Schwartz, W.
- Leonard, J. B.
Published
Abstract
Background: Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin are serotonergic hallucinogens that are used primarily for recreational abuse. Small studies evaluated the efficacy of LSD and psilocybin for several psychiatric conditions. There are limited safety or toxicity data for either of these substances, especially in large populations. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of single-substance exposures of LSD or psilocybin-containing mushrooms (PcMs) reported to United States poison centers from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2016. The study describes the most frequent toxicities, management sites, and medical outcomes. Results: A total of 5883 PcM and 3554 LSD exposures were included. Most patients were between 13 and 29 years of age (83.9% PcM, 88.9% LSD) and primarily male (77.9% PcM, 74.1% LSD). Most common clinical effects were hallucinations (45.8% PcM, 37.4% LSD), agitation (24.1% PcM, 42.4% LSD), and tachycardia (18.0% PcM, 38.6% LSD). Serious clinical effects were infrequent, but included hyperthermia, seizures, coma, increased serum creatinine, and cardiac arrest. Most patients were treated and released from the emergency department. More LSD patients were admitted to critical care and non-critical care units than PcM patients. Moderate effect was the most frequent outcome for both substances (61.0% PcM, 62.3% LSD). Conclusion: These data find that LSD and PcM use occurs primarily in adolescents and young adults, who experience mild to moderate adverse effects. Serious effects are infrequent but can occur. While most LSD and PcM users require only emergency department management, LSD use is more likely to require medical admission.
Research Summary of 'Does getting high hurt? Characterization of cases of LSD and psilocybin-containing mushroom exposures to national poison centers between 2000 and 2016'
Introduction
Earlier research and recent small clinical studies have examined LSD and psilocybin for psychiatric indications, but safety and toxicity data from large, real-world populations remain limited. Controlled trials and systematic reviews of therapeutic administration report few serious medical adverse events, yet case reports and small series describe deaths and severe outcomes that typically involve trauma, restraint, or co-ingested substances. Recreational use continues to be common, doses vary widely in the illicit market, and prior literature does not adequately characterise the frequency or severity of acute toxicities outside controlled settings. Leonard and colleagues set out to describe the acute toxicity profile, management sites, and medical outcomes associated with single-substance exposures to LSD and psilocybin-containing mushrooms reported to the US National Poison Data System (NPDS) between 2000 and 2016. The study aims to fill a gap in population-level safety data that could inform clinicians, public health surveillance and policy if therapeutic or broader recreational use increases.
Methods
This was a retrospective database study of NPDS reports from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2016. Exposures were identified by product codes (Poisindex) for LSD and for Group 6 mushrooms (psilocybin and psilocin). The investigators included only single-substance exposures with a known medical outcome and excluded cases with multiple substances or unknown outcomes, because coded data do not reliably attribute effects to a single agent. Extracted variables included age, sex, route and chronicity of exposure, coded clinical effects deemed related to the exposure, final management site (composite of management and level of care), reason for exposure (intentional abuse, unintentional, etc.), treatments given, and coded medical outcome. NPDS uses predefined outcome categories: no effect, minor, moderate, major, and death; moderate effects generally require treatment but are not life-threatening, while major effects are life-threatening or cause significant disability. Duration of exposure (acute, acute on chronic, chronic) was defined using NPDS time thresholds (acute ≤ 8 h). Descriptive statistics were reported, with medians and interquartile ranges for non-normal data. Confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Clopper–Pearson method. The study excluded records with unknown or estimated ages from age-group analyses and records with unknown gender from gender-based analyses. The investigators reviewed fatality abstracts for deaths. The Institutional Review Board judged the work to be not human subjects research.
Results
The NPDS search initially identified 19,442 cases. After excluding 5,767 multiple-substance reports there were 8,649 psilocybin-containing mushroom and 5,026 LSD exposures; of these, 5,883 mushroom and 3,554 LSD single-substance cases had known outcomes and were included in the analysis. Users were predominantly adolescents and young adults: 61.5% of LSD and 53.5% of psilocybin-containing mushroom cases were aged 13–19 years, and an additional 27.4% (LSD) and 30.3% (mushrooms) were aged 20–29 years. Median age was 18 years (IQR 16–21) for LSD and 19 years (IQR 17–19) for psilocybin-containing mushrooms. Males comprised the majority of cases (74.1% LSD, 77.9% mushrooms). Intentional abuse was the commonest reason for exposure (78.5% LSD, 75.9% mushrooms); unintentional exposures accounted for smaller proportions (7.5% LSD, 12.4% mushrooms). Most exposures were acute (≤ 8 h): 89.1% for LSD and 95.3% for mushrooms. Asymptomatic presentations were uncommon (6.8% LSD, 9.5% mushrooms). The majority of symptomatic patients had two or fewer related adverse effects (60.3% LSD, 67.6% mushrooms). The most frequently recorded clinical effects were hallucinations, agitation, tachycardia, mydriasis, confusion and vomiting. Effect durations were short for most patients: < 24 h in 77.9% of LSD and 84.4% of mushroom cases. Treatments given were typically limited: benzodiazepines were administered in 34.7% of LSD cases and 17.0% of mushroom cases; other sedating agents in 8.2% (LSD) and 2.3% (mushrooms); intravenous fluids in 36.0% (LSD) and 22.4% (mushrooms). Single‑dose activated charcoal was given in 3.4% of LSD and 12.8% of mushroom cases. Disposition and severity differed by agent. Most psilocybin-containing mushroom patients were managed at home or treated and released from an emergency department, whereas a larger share of LSD patients were evaluated in emergency departments and admitted for medical care. Moderate effects were the most frequent medical outcome (61.0% mushrooms, 62.3% LSD). Hospital admission occurred in approximately 13.3% of mushroom users and 26.5% of LSD users, and critical care admission rates were higher for LSD (reported as 16.9% LSD vs 6.2% mushrooms in the text). Major effects were uncommon but more frequent in LSD cases (6.2% vs 2.1%). There were eight deaths in total: three among mushroom cases and five among LSD cases. Review of fatality abstracts suggested multiple contributing factors in all deaths. For the mushroom fatalities two were judged to have unknown contribution from psilocybin and one contributory death had objective detection of psilocin (>200 ng/mL, urine) but also involved trauma and asystolic arrest after restraint. LSD fatalities included cases with severe hyperthermia, status epilepticus, trauma with prolonged restraint, meningitis, and one with insufficient data. Objective toxicological confirmation was generally lacking for fatalities.
Discussion
Leonard and colleagues interpret the NPDS data as indicating that recreational use of LSD and psilocybin-containing mushrooms reported to poison centres occurs predominantly in male adolescents and young adults and most commonly produces mild to moderate adverse effects that are short lived. The authors note that the common clinical features in this large, uncontrolled population—hallucinations, agitation, tachycardia, nausea and transient hypertension—are broadly consistent with effects reported in therapeutic trials, while also providing better estimates of incidence when these substances are used in the community. The investigators highlight differences between agents: LSD exposures were more likely than mushroom exposures to result in hospital admission, critical care admission and major effects. Serious events such as hyperthermia, seizures, rhabdomyolysis and cardiac arrest were rare but did occur, often in cases with additional complicating factors such as trauma or restraint. The authors caution that most poison centre calls represent symptomatic patients and that benign or enjoyable exposures are unlikely to be reported, which biases the dataset toward adverse outcomes. Key limitations are emphasised. The study is retrospective and depends on caller‑reported information; laboratory confirmation of the substance was usually absent; NPDS coding restricts which clinical effects and therapies are captured and some important psychiatric codes (for example anxiety, panic or psychosis) are not available and may be subsumed under "other" or "agitation". Time from exposure to call was not available, precluding assessment of delayed phenomena such as hallucinogen‑persisting perception disorder. The database does not code serotonin toxicity and dose information was unreliable or unavailable, so dose–response relationships were not assessed. Underreporting of cases, particularly those with benign courses, is also likely. Finally, the authors place the findings in a public health context: poison centre surveillance yields valuable, population‑level indicators of trends and uncommon toxicities that may not appear in small clinical trials, and the data suggest that most community exposures require only emergency management but that LSD carries a higher probability of requiring hospital care.
Conclusion
Leonard and colleagues conclude that when used in the community most single‑substance psilocybin‑containing mushroom and LSD exposures produce one to four related adverse effects of short duration. Common effects mirror those seen in therapeutic studies. Hospital admission occurred in about 13.3% of mushroom cases and 26.5% of LSD cases, and benzodiazepines or other sedatives were the usual treatments for symptomatic patients. Serious adverse events were uncommon but present; overall, community use as captured by poison centre reports generally did not result in life‑threatening effects.
View full paper sections
METHODS
This was a retrospective, database study of all single-substance exposures to either LSD or psilocybin-containing mushroom exposures reported to the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) NPDS from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2016. The NPDS is a database owned and maintained by the AAPCC. Specialists in poison information receive calls from the public, healthcare practitioners, and others. The specialists acquire and code case information including patient information, management site, reason for exposure, clinical effects, and medical outcomes. LSD and psilocybin exposures in NPDS were identified by product code using Poisindex (Micromedex, Truven Health Analytics, Inc., Greenwood Village, CO, USA) database for all exposures reported to United States poison centers. Inclusion criteria were: single substance LSD or Group 6 Mushrooms: Hallucinogens (Psilocybin and Psilocin) exposures; age 0-89 years; followed to a known medical outcome. Cases with unknown outcomes or multiple products were excluded from the study. Multiple-substance exposures were excluded because coded data are not specific enough to attribute clinical effects to any specific substance. Patient characteristics (age, sex), substance, route of exposure, chronicity, clinical effects, final management site, and coded medical outcome were evaluated. Patient ages were grouped byOnly clinical effects coded as related to the exposure were included. Reasons for exposures were unintentional, intentional, malicious, contamination or tampering, adverse reactions, unknown reasons, and withdrawal. Intentional abuse is defined according to the AAPCC NPDS coding manual to mean "the improper or incorrect use of a substance where the patient was likely attempting to gain a high, euphoric effect or some other psychotropic effect, including recreational use of a substance for any effect" (American Association of Poison Control Centers, 2016) and is not defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders abuse diagnosis criteria. Chronicity of exposure includes acute, acute on chronic, chronic, and unknown. Of note, acute is considered an exposure occurring over 8 h or less. Acute on chronic exposures are single elevated doses on top of continuous, repeated, or intermittent exposure over a period of greater than 8 h. Chronic exposures are continuous, repeated, or intermittent exposures to the same substance lasting longer than 8 h. Final management site, a composite of two coded fields (management and level of care), is the highest level of care received by the patient. Final management sites are non-health care facility (managed on site), treated/evaluated and released from emergency department, admitted to critical care unit, admitted to a non-critical care unit, admitted to psychiatry, and other/ unknown. Medical outcomes reflect the severity of effects and are coded as standard definitions defined by the NPDS coding manual. Known medical outcomes are no effect, minor effect, moderate effect, major effect, and death. Patients with minor outcomes had minimally bothersome signs or symptoms. Moderate effects include signs and symptoms that are more pronounced, more bothersome, more prolonged, or more systemic than minor symptoms and usually require some form of treatment, but are not life-threatening. Major effects are coded when symptoms are life-threatening or result in significant disability or disfigurement. Poison centers also submit fatality abstracts and judge the relative contribution of the exposure to the fatality. The fatality abstracts were obtained for deaths and reviewed. Data were provided in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Cross tables were constructed with Microsoft Excel. Patients with age denoted as unknown age or age estimated by decade were excluded from descriptive analysis of age and analysis by age group. Patients with unknown gender were excluded from gender-based analyses. Descriptive analyses were performed using medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for nonnormally distributed data. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.00 for Windows (GraphPad, LaJolla, CA, USA). This study was determined to be by "Not Human Subject Research" by the Institutional Review Board.
RESULTS
A total of 19,442 cases were identified by the NPDS search. After excluding 5767 multiple substances cases, there were 8649 psilocybin exposures and 5026 LSD exposures. Of these, 5883 psilocybin exposures and 3554 LSD exposures were followed to known outcomes and were included in the study. Figureshows the number of cases per year over the study period. The number of LSD cases decreased between 2000 and 2002 and remained steady until 2012, from which time number of cases rose steadily. The number of psilocybin mushroom exposures rose from 2000 to 2004 but has been declining since 2004. Most patients were adolescents and young adults with 61.5% of LSD and 53.5% of psilocybin mushrooms between 13 and 19 years of age and 27.4% of LSD and 30.3% of psilocybin mushrooms between 20 and 29 years of age. Of the 5660 psilocybin patients with a recorded age, the median age was 19 years (IQR: 17, 19) with a range of five months to 83 years. A total of 3440 LSD patients had age recorded; median age was 18 years (IQR: 16, 21) with a range of nine months to 73 years. Patients were mostly male, 74.1% of LSD and 77.9% of psilocybin mushrooms. The most frequent reason for exposure was intentional abuse, 78.5% for LSD and 75.9% for psilocybin mushrooms. The next most frequent reason was unintentional general (accidental): 7.5% for LSD, 12.4% for psilocybin mushrooms. Most exposures were either acute (89.1% for LSD, 95.3% for psilocybin mushrooms) or unknown (7.5% for LSD, 2.7% for psilocybin mushrooms). Only 6.8% of LSD cases and 9.5% of psilocybin mushroom cases were asymptomatic. Most patients had two or fewer related adverse effects, 67.6% for psilocybin mushrooms and 60.3% for LSD. The most common clinical effects were hallucinations, agitation, tachycardia, mydriasis, confusion, and vomiting. Tablecompares common and serious clinical effects for both psilocybin mushrooms and LSD. Tablelists common clinical effects broken down by age groups and gender. As shown in Table, male users of both psilocybin mushrooms and LSD consistently experienced a higher frequency of the most common effects compared with female users. Serious clinical effects occurred primarily in those ages 13 to 29 years for both psilocybin mushrooms and LSD, with only four serious effects for patients 12 years and younger. There was no difference between males and females in frequency for any of the serious effects. The duration of effects was < 24 h for 77.9% of LSD and 84.4% of psilocybin mushrooms patients who experienced an adverse effect. Most patients received two or fewer types of treatment, 92.3% for psilocybin mushrooms and 86.1% for LSD. Treatment was primarily benzodiazepines (34.7% and 17.0%), other sedation (8.2% and 2.3%), and intravenous fluids (36.0% and 22.4%) for LSD and psilocybin mushrooms, respectively. Gastrointestinal decontamination with single dose activated charcoal was performed in 3.4% of LSD cases and 12.8% of psilocybin mushroom cases. Tabledisplays final management sites and medical outcomes for psilocybin mushrooms and LSD cases. Tablebreaks down final management site by age and gender. For psilocybin mushrooms, most patients were either managed at home or treated/released from an emergency department. In contrast for LSD, most patients were managed either in the emergency department or admitted for medical care. Medical outcome was coded as moderate for most patients; 61.0% for psilocybin mushrooms and 62.3% for LSD. Point estimates of major effect were higher for the group from 13 to 29 years, but confidence intervals overlapped with younger and older populations for both psilocybin mushrooms and LSD. Male patients were more likely to be admitted to critical care units or have a moderate effect outcome and less likely to have a no effect outcome or be managed at home for both psilocybin mushrooms and LSD. Critical care admission rates for LSD did not differ by age. There were eight deaths; three reported in the psilocybin mushroom group and five in the LSD group. Review of the fatality abstracts for psilocybin mushroom deaths revealed that the contribution was unknown for two of the deaths and considered contributory for the third death. Only the death assigned as contributory had an objective detection of psilocin (>200 ng/mL, urine). The patient experienced trauma (hit on the head by police) and asystolic cardiac arrest possibly due to being agitated and restrained. Review of LSD abstracts revealed that one patient experienced significant hyperthermia (105°F), one experienced status epilepticus while hiking, one experienced trauma and prolonged restraint, one died of meningitis, and the final patient had inadequate information documented to assess any cause of death. In summary, all patients had multiple contributing factors to their deaths.
CONCLUSION
This study describes toxicity and outcomes of psilocybin-containing mushrooms and LSD use reported to poison centers in the US. There were three times as many males as females, similar to what has been reported in the Monitoring the Future (MTF) study. Most exposures were in persons aged 13-19 or 20-29 years of age. Medical outcomes were judged as moderate effect, major effect, or death for 63.2% of psilocybin mushroom and 68.6% of LSD exposures, meaning that most patients experienced clinical effects that required some form of therapy. The mainstays of treatment were intravenous fluids and sedation with benzodiazepines or other sedating agents. Males were more likely to experience common effects compared with females for both psilocybin mushrooms and LSD, but no differences were identified for serious effects. Male patients were also more likely to be admitted to a critical care unit. There was also a shift in distribution of medical outcomes towards more serious outcomes for males compared with females. Most patients were treated and released from the emergency department. Most symptomatic patients had symptoms that lasted less than 24 h. This is consistent with the reported duration of effects of LSD and psilocybin-containing mushrooms. While the intent of the study was not to compare psilocybin mushrooms and LSD, it should be noted that a larger proportion of LSD patients were admitted to the hospital than psilocybin mushroom patients; critical care admissions were for 16.9% of LSD and 6.2% of psilocybin mushroom. Patients exposed to LSD also had a higher rate of major effect (6.2% vs. 2.1%). Considering the larger proportion of serious effects, the relative increase in admission to critical care for patients who used LSD compared with those who used psilocybin mushrooms is not surprising. Most patients experienced few effects related to their exposure. The number of related effects was two or fewer for 60.3% of LSD exposures and 67.6% of psilocybin mushroom exposures. Hallucinations, agitation, tachycardia, confusion, nausea, and vomiting were the most common effects. In the case-series of LSD overdoses by Klock and colleagues, it was noted that all eight patients were tachycardic, with mydriasis, emesis, flushing, and diaphoresis; three of eight experienced transient hypertension, four developed fever, and two developed diarrhea. Additionally, all patients were coagulopathic. The series of psilocybin mushroom ingestions by Peden and colleagues identified hallucinations, mydriasis, dysphoria, hyperreflexia, tachycardia, drowsiness, and euphoria as the most common effects. Most people using LSD or psilocybin mushrooms are trying to experience hallucinations. Tachycardia may be due to pharmacologic action or possibly to agitation or unpleasant hallucinations, although only 207 psilocybin mushroom and 279 LSD patients experienced agitation, hallucinations, and tachycardia together (data not shown). Serious effects (cardiac arrest, dysrhythmias, and status epilepticus) were exceedingly rare, but did occur. Hyperthermia occurred in 2.0% of psilocybin mushroom cases and 3.8% of LSD cases; this has been reported as an effect by others. Rhabdomyolysis was reported with both psilocybin mushrooms and LSD and occurred in 0.3% and 1.1% of our cases, respectively. Multiple small randomized controlled trials and observational studies have used either psilocybin or LSD therapeutically for the treatment of multiple psychiatric disorders. Few adverse effects were documented in older published studies, but 67-90% of patients stated they would repeat the experience if given the opportunity, suggesting that the drugs were well tolerated. In one study, approximately half of the patients required termination of LSD experiences with chlorpromazine, but specific adverse effects were not reported. One study identified nausea, vomiting and psychotic reactions. One systematic review noted that newer studies did not identify any serious adverse effects. The most common effects included transient hypertension in up to 34% of patients, increased heart rate, increased systolic blood pressure, anxiety in up to 26%, fear, nausea in up to 17%, and psychological distress in up to 32% of patients.2011, 2016;. Some patients required therapy with benzodiazepines for psychological reactions and only one withdrew due to adverse events from these studies. Our data are consistent with these studies, showing most adverse effects were hypertension, tachycardia, anxiety, hallucinations, and nausea. Our data provide a better estimation of the incidence of these effects when the substances are available to a larger population. Additionally, our data identify rare effects seen in the larger population and uncontrolled situations, similar to the use of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. It is important to note that most patients do not call poison centers when they are enjoying their hallucinogenic experience; most patients calling the poison center or patients brought to the emergency department for hallucinogen exposures are likely experiencing symptoms, usually adverse effects. This is supported by the fact that less than 10% of all of our exposures were coded as no effect for a medical outcome. Calls regarding asymptomatic patients often include concerned family members calling the poison center or bringing patients to the emergency department, despite a lack of symptoms. Additionally, some hospitals call to report cases regardless of whether a patient is symptomatic, especially when seeking advice for monitoring parameters. Of note, there was a significant decrease in the number of exposures to LSD from 2000 to 2002. This is consistent with data from the adult MTF study. The MTF study found a decrease in annual prevalence in LSD use that dropped from 6.4% amongstAnnual use remained below 3% until 2014, when it rose to 3.5%, and has further risen to 3.9% in 2016. The reason for this decrease in exposures reported to poison centers and annual prevalence reported by MTF is unknown at this time. Despite the decrease in 2002, poison centers have seen an increase in the number of cases related to LSD beginning in 2012 (Figure). Psilocybin mushroom exposures increased until 2004, but slowly declined from 2004 to 2016. Lack of a national reporting system or registry for mushroom poisonings as well as grouping of psilocybin mushrooms within the overall category of hallucinogens in national reports such as the National Survey on Drug Use and Health makes it difficult to determine the prevalence of psilocybin mushroom use. As such, poison center data provide valuable information regarding national trends in hallucinogenic mushroom use and toxicity. The trend in the annual number of included exposures for both substances was consistent with those excluded due to polysubstance use (data not shown). The death abstracts were generally inconclusive about the contribution of either LSD or psilocybin to the death of the patient. This was possibly due to inadequate testing, complicated clinical scenarios or lack of information about blood testing. The single death with confirmed laboratory evidence of psilocybin had also been restrained and undergone head-trauma from police. It was unclear how much the psilocybin mushroom ingestion contributed to death. Traumatic deaths have been reported after psilocybin mushroom usealong with a single overdose in a heart transplant recipient, possibly due to a sympathetic surge. Authors have reported that psilocybin mushrooms contain phenylethylamine, which has sympathomimetic action, which is consistent with reported effects. At least two of the LSD cases in our series were restrained, which possibly contributed to their deaths, as has been identified with other LSD related deaths. Another patient consumed "two hits" of LSD approximately 2 h prior to developing status epilepticus. His death was attributed to hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy secondary to drug ingestion. As with most poison center cases, objective testing was available for only one of the fatalities and the other fatalities had only "reported" taking the substance. We did not attempt to evaluate dose-related effects due to significant limitations in the available dataset and because most patients are unlikely to know how much LSD or psilocybin they are actually exposed to. Additionally, there were very few exposures reported as acute on chronic or chronic, so we did not assess the effect of prolonged exposures. One significant limitation of this study and in many hallucinogen studies is the inability to assess for hallucinogen-persisting perception disorder. Time of exposure relative to time of call was not available for this study, so we were unable to identify whether any of the cases were hallucinogenpersisting perception disorder. Serotonin toxicity was not diagnosed in previous case series and is not available to code in the NPDS database, but it is possible that some of these patients would meet the diagnostic criteria. Other study limitations include the retrospective design and the fact that data are dependent on what is reported by the caller, which may be the individual using the psilocybin or LSD, friends/family, or healthcare providers. There was no laboratory confirmation of substance available in our dataset and substances were reported to the poison centers based on clinical suspicion or history. Some research suggests that clinical diagnosis and history lack adequate sensitivity and specificity for acute overdose; however, these studies usually include few to no patients using hallucinogens and focus primarily on opioids, amphetamines, cocaine, acetaminophen, and benzodiazepines. Underreporting of clinical effects and treatments is possible, although effects that are more serious are more likely to be captured in this type of database. Analysis of medical outcome and admission site likely reflect the gravity of exposures. Only clinical effects thought to be related to either LSD or psilocybin mushrooms were included in this study. The coding system contains a fixed number of clinical effects and any not captured in the database are listed as "other." This explains the large proportion of "other" effects. Specifically, anxiety, psychosis, and panic disorder are not available to code, but may be coded as "other" or agitation. Additionally, receptor antagonist (D2, 5-HT2) use for sedation is not a specific coded therapy and is often coded as "other sedation." Reporting to the poison center is voluntary and many cases, especially those with benign courses, may not have been reported.
Study Details
- Study Typeindividual
- Populationhumans
- Characteristicsobservational
- Journal
- Compounds