Classic psychedelics, health behavior, and physical health

In a US-representative sample (N = 2,822), lifetime use of classic psychedelics was associated with healthier tobacco- and diet-related behaviours, and among users greater psychological insight during their most insightful psychedelic experience predicted healthier exercise habits, healthier BMI and better diet (with some alcohol-related improvements). Although causality cannot be inferred, the results suggest psychological insight from classic psychedelic experiences may facilitate positive health-behaviour change, particularly for weight management.

Authors

  • Otto Simonsson
  • Peter S. Hendricks

Published

Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
individual Study

Abstract

Background: Preliminary evidence suggests that classic psychedelics may be effective in the treatment of some psychiatric disorders, yet little remains known about their effects on health behavior and physical health. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate associations of lifetime classic psychedelic use and psychological insight during one’s most insightful classic psychedelic experience with health behavior and physical health. Methods: Using data representative of the US population with regard to sex, age, and ethnicity ( N = 2822), this study examined associations of lifetime classic psychedelic use and psychological insight with health behavior and physical health. Results: Lifetime classic psychedelic use was associated with more healthy tobacco-related and diet-related behavior ( β = 0.05 and 0.09, respectively). Among lifetime classic psychedelic users ( n = 613), greater Psychological Insight Questionnaire (PIQ) total scale, PIQ Avoidance and Maladaptive Patterns (AMP) subscale, and PIQ Goals and Adaptive Patterns (GAP) subscale scores were each associated with higher odds of more healthy exercise-related behavior [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) (95% confidence interval, CI = 1.38 (1.13–1.68), 1.38 (1.13–1.68), and 1.32 (1.10–1.60), respectively] and higher odds of having a healthy body mass index (BMI) [aOR (95% CI) = 1.32 (1.07–1.63), 1.36 (1.10–1.69), and 1.23 (1.01–1.50), respectively], and greater GAP subscale scores were associated with more healthy diet-related behavior ( β = 0.10). All PIQ scales were positively associated with some health behavior improvements (overall, diet, exercise) attributed to respondents’ most insightful classic psychedelic experience ( β = 0.42, 0.18, and 0.17; β = 0.40, 0.19, and 0.17; and β = 0.40, 0.15, and 0.15, respectively), but only PIQ total scale and AMP subscale scores were positively associated with alcohol-related health behavior improvements ( β = 0.13 and 0.16, respectively). Conclusion: Although these results cannot demonstrate causality, they suggest that psychological insight during a classic psychedelic experience may lead to positive health behavior change and better physical health in some domains, in particular in those related to weight management.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Classic psychedelics, health behavior, and physical health'

Introduction

Earlier research has reported associations between lifetime use of classic psychedelics (serotonin 2A receptor agonists such as mescaline and psilocybin) and better physical health in population samples, including lower odds of overweight/obesity and of conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension. It is plausible that such associations could be mediated, at least in part, by changes in health behaviour; qualitative and cross-sectional studies have reported spontaneous improvements in diet, exercise, and substance use following psychedelic experiences, and several measures of the acute psychedelic experience (for example, mystical experience and ego-dissolution scales) predict longer-term outcomes. Recent work identifies psychological insight as a potentially important common feature of the psychedelic experience, but its relationship to health behaviour and physical health has not been examined in a nationally representative sample free of pronounced self-selection bias. Simonsson and colleagues set out to test whether lifetime classic psychedelic use and the degree of psychological insight reported for respondents' single most insightful psychedelic experience are associated with multiple domains of health behaviour (tobacco, alcohol, diet, exercise) and with markers of physical health (body mass index categorised as healthy versus not, and a composite of noncommunicable disease (NCD) in the past year). Using a US adult sample representative on sex, age, and ethnicity, the authors hypothesised that lifetime use and greater psychological insight would each be associated with healthier behaviours, higher odds of healthy BMI, and lower odds of recent NCD.

Methods

The investigators preregistered their hypotheses and analysis plan and aimed to recruit approximately 2,800 US residents aged 18 or older through the Prolific Academic platform between 1 October and 9 October 2021; the final target was based on power calculations anticipating about 395 lifetime classic psychedelic users. Prolific's representativeness function was used to stratify the sample on sex, age (five bands), and ethnicity to approximate the US adult distribution. Participants provided digital informed consent, completed demographic and substance-use questions, and answered measures of health behaviour and health status. Study completion payment was US$2.20; 131 participants did not complete the study. Procedures were deemed exempt by the University of Wisconsin–Madison IRB. Measures included demographics (age, gender, ethnoracial identity, sexual orientation, education, household income, marital status, self-reported engagement in risky behaviour) and lifetime use of a range of substances. A technical error meant data were not collected for lifetime use of other stimulants, heroin, and tranquilizers. Lifetime classic psychedelic use was assessed by asking about ayahuasca, DMT, LSD, mescaline, peyote, San Pedro, and psilocybin; respondents endorsing any of these were coded as lifetime users. Among users (n = 613), psychological insight during their single most insightful psychedelic experience was measured with the 23-item Psychological Insight Questionnaire (PIQ), producing a total score and two subscales: Avoidance and Maladaptive Patterns (AMP) and Goals and Adaptive Patterns (GAP). The PIQ and subscales were z-scored for analyses. Health-behaviour assessments comprised validated brief instruments: the 7-item Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence (scores reverse-scored so higher values indicate healthier tobacco behaviour), the 3-item AUDIT-C for alcohol (reverse-scored), the 7-item International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form (IPAQ-SF) categorised into low/medium/high activity, and the 8-item Starting the Conversation scale for dietary quality (reverse-scored so higher scores reflect healthier diet). Height and weight were self-reported to calculate BMI, dichotomised as healthy (18.5–25) versus not. A binary composite variable captured whether a respondent had been told by a doctor in the past 12 months that they had cancer, heart disease, high blood pressure, or type 2 diabetes (NCD in the past year). Author-constructed slider items (0–100) asked lifetime users whether they thought their most insightful psychedelic experience and subsequent contemplation led to changes in overall health behaviour and domain-specific behaviours. Statistical analyses used linear regression for alcohol-, tobacco-, and diet-related behaviour outcomes, ordered logistic regression for exercise categories, and logistic regression for binary BMI and NCD outcomes. Models controlled for a wide set of demographic and substance-use covariates (age bands, gender categories including transgender/non-binary, ethnoracial identity, sexual orientation, education, household income bands, marital status, lifetime engagement in risky behaviour, lifetime use of specified drugs and tobacco products, and age of first alcohol use). PIQ scores and subscales were standardised to aid comparison. The extracted text indicates supplemental tables reported descriptive statistics and exploratory analyses.

Results

The sample targeted the preregistered size (N = 2,822 as reported earlier) and included 613 respondents who reported lifetime classic psychedelic use; non-completers numbered 131. Descriptive comparisons (reported in supplemental material) showed lifetime psychedelic use was more common among men, those reporting greater engagement in risky behaviour, and respondents with lifetime use of other illicit substances. In covariate-adjusted regression models, lifetime classic psychedelic use was associated very modestly with healthier tobacco-related behaviour and healthier diet-related behaviour, but it was not associated with alcohol-related behaviour or exercise-related behaviour. Within the subgroup of lifetime users (n = 613), higher PIQ total scores and both PIQ subscales (AMP and GAP) were each modestly associated with higher odds of healthier exercise-related behaviour. Greater GAP scores were also modestly associated with healthier diet-related behaviour; other direct associations between insight measures and tobacco or alcohol behaviours were not observed in these models. When analysing health-behaviour change attributed by respondents to their single most insightful psychedelic experience, greater PIQ total, AMP, and GAP scores were moderately to strongly associated with participants reporting greater overall health-behaviour improvements. These insight measures were modestly associated with self-reported improvements in diet and exercise attributed to that experience. Greater PIQ total and AMP scores were also modestly associated with alcohol-related behaviour improvements attributed to the experience. None of the models showed associations between insight measures and tobacco-related improvements. Regarding physical health outcomes, lifetime classic psychedelic use was not associated with having a healthy BMI or with NCD in the past year. By contrast, higher PIQ total scores and both subscales were each associated with modestly higher odds of having a healthy BMI. No association was observed between either lifetime use or psychological insight and NCD in the past year. The authors note additional exploratory results in supplemental tables but do not provide numerical effect sizes or confidence intervals in the extracted text.

Discussion

Simonsson and colleagues interpret the results as suggesting that psychological insight experienced during a classic psychedelic episode may contribute to positive health-behaviour change and to better physical health in some domains. They highlight the most consistent pattern in the data: links between psychological insight (PIQ total and subscales) and healthier diet and exercise behaviours, and higher odds of a healthy BMI. Given the relevance of diet, exercise, and BMI to obesity and its health consequences, the authors propose that classic psychedelics warrant further investigation as a potential avenue in weight-management research, particularly where treatments can be designed to promote insight (for example, by integrating meditative practices to cultivate self-knowledge). The authors characterise the associations with alcohol- and tobacco-related behaviours as less clear-cut. They note that prior studies documenting cessation effects recruited participants with problematic substance use, whereas the present sample was more representative and likely contained many respondents without substance problems; floor effects and differences in sample composition may therefore account for null or mixed findings. The null association between lifetime psychedelic use and physical-health indicators contrasts with prior large national studies; the authors caution that earlier investigations had much larger sample sizes (providing far greater statistical power) and used different variable coding (for example, BMI coded across six categories rather than dichotomised here), limiting comparability. Several limitations are acknowledged. The sample was stratified on sex, age, and ethnicity but did not appear representative on socioeconomic indicators such as education and household income; the prevalence of lifetime classic psychedelic use in the sample (22%) exceeded the 14% reported in the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health, possibly reflecting higher socioeconomic status of the Prolific sample or underestimation of some substances in NSDUH. The questionnaire omitted items on set and setting for the most insightful experience, preventing analysis of context-dependent contributors to insight and subsequent behaviour change. Crucially, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference: it is equally possible that healthier people are more likely to have used psychedelics and to report insight, or that unmeasured confounders (for example, personality traits) account for associations. The authors recommend longitudinal studies and randomised controlled trials to clarify causal pathways and to test whether eliciting psychological insight mediates health-behaviour and physical-health outcomes.

Conclusion

The authors conclude that, while classic psychedelics have been preliminarily linked to mental-health benefits, their effects on health behaviour and physical health are less well understood. The present study's findings indicate that the subjective experience of psychological insight elicited by classic psychedelics may be associated with positive health-behaviour change and better physical health in specific domains, particularly those related to weight management. The paper is presented as a springboard for future longitudinal research and randomised controlled trials to interrogate potential causal pathways between classic psychedelic use, psychological insight, health behaviour change, and physical health.

View full paper sections

METHODS

The study (hypotheses, design plan, sampling plan, variables, and analysis plan) was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) atand. The sample size was determined using linear multiple regression (fixed model, R2 increase) in GPower,which revealed that 395 lifetime classic psychedelic users would achieve 80% power to detect small effect sizes with an alpha of .05. Assuming similar prevalence of lifetime classic psychedelic use in the US adult population as recent investigations (~14%),we estimated that 2800 total participants would be necessary to get approximately 395 lifetime classic psychedelic users in the sample. We, therefore, aimed to recruit 2800 participants. The participants were US residents who were 18 years or older and were recruited between 1 October 2021 and 9 October 2021 through Prolific Academic (), which is a participant recruitment platform for researchers. The platform offers a representativeness function that uses proportionate stratification on three census-matched factors -sex (male, female), age (18-27, 28-37, 38-47, 48-57, and 58+), and ethnicity (White, Mixed, Asian, Black, Other)to reflect the demographic distribution of the US adult population. If participants do not complete the study (n = 131 non-completers in this study), the platform's algorithms dynamically adjust sampling requirements over time in order to deliver the most representative sample possible. The study description in recruitment materials focused on health behavior and did not mention classic psychedelic use (see Supplemental Materials for recruitment materials) to avoid potential self-selection bias. All participants gave informed consent digitally before being asked about demographic characteristics, substance use, health behavior, and health status. Participants who reported lifetime classic psychedelic use (n = 613) were also asked additional questions related to their use of classic psychedelics (e.g. psychological insight). Study completion resulted in US$2.20 payment. Study procedures were determined to be exempt from review by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (reference number: 2021-1128). All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

RESULTS

Supplemental Tableshows descriptive statistics of lifetime classic psychedelic users versus non-lifetime classic psychedelic users. As seen in the table, lifetime classic psychedelic use was, for example, more common among men, individuals with greater self-reported engagement in risky behavior, and individuals who reported lifetime use of other illicit substances. Tablepresents results from the regression models testing the unique associations between lifetime classic psychedelic use, psychological insight, and health behavior. As demonstrated in the table, lifetime classic psychedelic use was very modestly associated with more healthy tobacco-related and diet-related behavior, but no association was observed with alcohol-related and exercise-related behavior. Among the respondents who reported lifetime classic psychedelic use (n = 613), greater PIQ total scale scores, AMP subscale scores, and GAP subscale scores were each modestly associated with higher odds of more healthy exercise-related behavior. Greater GAP subscale scores were also modestly associated with more healthy diet-related behavior, but no other associations were observed (see Supplemental Tablefor exploratory analyses). Tabledisplays results from the regression models testing the unique associations between health behavior change attributed to respondents' most insightful classic psychedelic experience and degree of psychological insight during that experience. As indicated in the table, greater PIQ total scale scores, AMP subscale scores, and GAP subscale scores were each moderately to strongly associated with overall health behavior improvements, and modestly associated with improvements in diet and exercise attributed to the most insightful classic psychedelic experience. Greater PIQ total scale scores and AMP subscale scores were also modestly associated with alcoholrelated health behavior improvements attributed to the most insightful classic psychedelic experience. No association was observed with health behavior improvements related to tobacco in any of the models. Tableshows results from the regression models testing the unique associations between lifetime classic psychedelic use, psychological insight, and physical health. As shown in the table, lifetime classic psychedelic use was not associated with BMI, but greater PIQ total scale scores, AMP subscale scores, and GAP subscale scores were associated with modestly higher odds of having a healthy BMI. No association was observed with NCD in the past year in any of the models (see Supplemental Tablefor exploratory analyses).

CONCLUSION

The present study investigated the associations between lifetime classic psychedelic use, TherapeuTic advances in psychopharmacology psychological insight during respondents' most insightful experience using a classic psychedelic, health behavior, and physical health in a representative sample of the US adult population. In covariate-adjusted regressions, results revealed very modest but statistically significant associations between lifetime classic psychedelic use and more healthy tobacco-related and diet-related behaviors. Among those who reported having used classic psychedelics at least once, greater PIQ total scale scores were modestly associated with higher odds of more healthy exercise-related behavior and higher odds of having a healthy BMI. Greater AMP and GAP subscale scores were also modestly associated with more healthy exercise-related behavior and higher odds of having a healthy BMI, although only greater GAP subscale scores were associated with more healthy diet-related behavior, with an effect modest in size. In regard to health behavior change attributed to respondents' most insightful classic psychedelic experience, greater PIQ total scale scores, AMP subscale scores, and GAP subscale scores were moderately to strongly associated with greater overall health behavior improvements and greater diet-related and exerciserelated health behavior improvements. Only greater PIQ total scale scores and AMP subscale scores were associated with greater alcoholrelated health behavior improvements, with effects modest in size. The findings in this study suggest that psychological insight induced by classic psychedelic use may contribute to positive health behavior change and better physical health in some domains. Notably, one of the most consistent findings was the links between psychological insight during respondents' most insightful classic psychedelic experience using a classic psychedelic with more healthy diet-related and exercise-related health behavior and having a healthy BMI, which are variables particularly relevant to obesity and its adverse health effects. This suggests that classic psychedelics could be a promising research avenue in weight management, at least to the degree that classic psychedelics elicit insight. It is, therefore, important to investigate how existing treatments can be leveraged to maximize insight (e.g. using meditative practices designed to cultivate self-knowledge and insight as part of the treatment).While the relationships with alcohol-related and tobacco-related health behavior were less clear, previous research suggests that classic psychedelic use can lead to alcohol and tobacco smoking cessation.Such studies have recruited participants with a history of problematic alcohol or tobacco use, which contrasts with the more representative sample used in this study. The associations (and the lack thereof) in this study with alcohol-related and tobacco-related health behavior should, therefore, be interpreted with caution, with floor effects potentially impacting results. The null findings on lifetime classic psychedelic use and physical health (healthy BMI, NCD in the past year) contrast with previous results from large, nationally representative studies in the United States.It is important to note that the previous studies had approximately 60-130 times more respondents and, therefore, had more statistical power to detect significant relationships, but there were also important differences in how physical health was measured and coded (e.g. BMI was coded as a dichotomous variable in this study whereas BMI was coded as a six-level variable in previous research),which further limits the comparisons that can be made between studies. There are several further limitations in the research design that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, the sample was stratified across sex, age, and ethnicity to reflect the US adult population, but it does not appear to have been representative on other variables related to health behavior and physical health (most notably the socioeconomic indicators educational attainment and annual household income). The percentage of participants who reported lifetime classic psychedelic use (22%) was similar to the prevalence of lifetime classic psychedelic use (23%) in another study using Prolific Academic for study recruitment,but it was still higher than the prevalence in the United States (14%) in previous research using the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH).This may be because the current sample was of higher socioeconomic status than the NSDUH sampleand also because the previous research using the NSDUH likely underestimates ayahuasca and DMT use.Second, the questionnaire did not include items related to set and setting of the most insightful classic psychedelic experience, which could have been used to identify context-dependent variables related to psychological insight, health behavior, and physical health. Since previous research has found set and setting to be an important aspect of the classic psychedelic experience,it would, therefore, be interesting to explore the contribution of these variables in future research. Third, given the cross-sectional study design, the results cannot be used to make conclusive causal inferences. It is possible that lifetime classic psychedelic use or greater psychological insight leads to positive health behavior change, but it may be equally possible that healthier people are more likely to have used classic psychedelics over their lifetime and to have had greater psychological insight during such experiences. Finally, the covariate-adjusted regressions controlled for several potential confounders, but it is possible that other uncontrolled variables (e.g. personality traits) may have affected the associations reported here. Future research should use longitudinal designs and attempt to elucidate the potential causal links between classic psychedelic use, psychological insight, health behavior, and physical health.

Study Details

Your Library