MDMAMDMA

Acute psychological effects of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA,“Ecstasy”) are attenuated by the serotonin uptake inhibitor citalopram

This study (n=16) found that the psychological effect of MDMA (105mg/70kg) was markedly reduced by citalopram, suggesting that MDMA-activity is associated with the 5-HT uptake site.

Authors

  • Baumann, C.
  • Gamma, A.
  • Liechti, M. E.

Published

Neuropsychopharmacology
individual Study

Abstract

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “Ecstasy”) is a recreational drug that has been shown to release serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) in animals. The effect of MDMA on 5-HT release can be blocked by 5-HT uptake inhibitors such as citalopram, suggesting that MDMA interacts with the 5-HT uptake site. It is unknown whether this mechanism is also responsible for the psychological effects of MDMA in humans. We investigated the effect of citalopram pretreatment (40 mg iv) on the psychological effects of MDMA (1.5 mg/kg po) in a double-blind placebo-controlled psychometric study in 16 healthy human volunteers. MDMA produced an emotional state with heightened mood, increased self-confidence and extroversion, moderate derealization, and an intensification of sensory perception. Most of these effects were markedly reduced by citalopram. This finding suggests that the psychological effects of MDMA are mediated via action at the 5-HT uptake site to increase 5-HT release through the carrier, as expected from animal studies.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'Acute psychological effects of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA,“Ecstasy”) are attenuated by the serotonin uptake inhibitor citalopram'

Introduction

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "Ecstasy") is an amphetamine derivative known from controlled studies to produce a characteristic psychoactive profile in humans, including heightened mood, increased sociability, moderate derealization and depersonalization, cognitive disturbances, and intensified sensory awareness. Preclinical work shows that MDMA primarily releases serotonin (5-HT) and, to a lesser extent, dopamine (DA), and that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as citalopram block MDMA-induced 5-HT release in vitro and in animals, suggesting carrier-mediated 5-HT efflux as a mechanism. It remains unclear, however, whether this mechanism accounts for MDMA's psychological effects in humans, as prior human information consisted mainly of uncontrolled case reports with mixed findings. Liechti and colleagues set out to test whether acute pretreatment with the highly selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor citalopram would attenuate the psychological effects of orally administered MDMA in healthy volunteers. The study used psychometric rating scales in a double-blind, placebo-controlled within-subject design and hypothesised that a 40 mg intravenous infusion of citalopram would reduce the subjective effects produced by 1.5 mg/kg oral MDMA.

Methods

The investigators conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject experiment with 16 healthy volunteers (12 male, 4 female), aged 21–39 years (mean 27.4 ± 4.4). Each participant completed four experimental sessions in counterbalanced order: placebo-placebo, citalopram-placebo, placebo-MDMA, and citalopram-MDMA, with at least 14 days between sessions to avoid carry-over effects. Exclusion criteria included personal or first-degree family history of major psychiatric disorder, head injury, regular substance or alcohol abuse, and elevated neuroticism scores on the Freiburger Personality Inventory. Six participants had prior recreational drug experience (two had tried Ecstasy). Citalopram hydrochloride 40 mg was administered intravenously, dissolved in 500 ml saline and infused over 90 minutes (≈330 ml/h). Racemic MDMA hydrochloride was given orally at 1.5 mg/kg (mean dose 100 mg ± 10), encapsulated. The timing was such that the IV infusion finished before oral administration; psychometric assessments were performed 120 minutes after MDMA/placebo intake (about 75 minutes after the expected onset of subjective effects). Cardiovascular measures and body temperature were monitored throughout; adverse effects were assessed during the session and at one and three days afterward. Subjective effects were assessed with two validated instruments. The Adjective Mood Rating Scale (AM) measures 14 mood-related scales including heightened mood, self-confidence, extroversion, and others. The Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (ASC) is a 66-item visual-analog instrument with three principal scales: Oceanic Boundlessness (OB; derealization/depersonalization and positive mood), Anxious Ego Dissolution (AED; ego-disintegration and anxiety-related items), and Visionary Restructuralization (VR; perceptual changes and imagery). Statistical analyses involved checking distributions with Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. The ASC effects of MDMA versus placebo were first assessed by MANOVA. To test for a specific inhibiting effect of citalopram on MDMA-induced changes, the team used two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with pretreatment (placebo vs citalopram) and treatment (placebo vs MDMA) as within-subject factors; Tukey post hoc tests examined subscore differences. AM scale scores were analysed with nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests due to discrete, non-normally distributed data. Significance was set at p < .05.

Results

All 16 participants completed the study. Oral MDMA at 1.5 mg/kg produced a predominantly positive affective state with heightened mood, increased self-confidence and extroversion, moderate derealization/depersonalization, intensified sensory awareness, and a slight rise in psychomotor drive. Subjective effects typically began between 20 and 120 minutes after ingestion (mean onset 45 minutes), peaked 15–30 minutes later, and lasted on average about 3 hours under MDMA alone. When participants were pretreated with citalopram, the peak subjective effects were markedly reduced but the mean duration was prolonged to approximately 5 hours. On the ASC, MDMA significantly elevated all three main scales compared to placebo (MANOVA: Rao R(3,12) = 7.25; p < .005), with highly significant increases on OB (p < .0004), AED (p < .0005) and VR (p < .007). Item-cluster analyses showed that OB increases were driven by "positive basic mood" (p < .0002), "derealization" (p < .0002), and "alterations of the sense of time" (p < .0005), with moderate increases in "mania-like experience" and "depersonalization". AED increases included "thought disorder" (p < .0001) and smaller effects on "frightening derealization" (p < .01), "loss of thought control" (p < .002), and "loss of body control" (p < .0002). VR increases were prominent for "changed meaning of percepts" (p < .0002), with moderate elevations in "facilitated recollection" and "facilitated imagination" (both p < .002) and a smaller rise in "synesthesia" (p < .01). Two-way ANOVAs revealed significant pretreatment-by-treatment interactions for all three ASC scales, confirming that citalopram reduced MDMA's psychological effects: OB F(1,15) = 22.47, p < .0003; AED F(1,15) = 23.04, p < .0002; VR F(1,15) = 12.80, p < .027. Citalopram attenuated MDMA-induced increases across most item clusters, with significant reductions in "positive mood" (p < .0003), "mania-like experience" (p < .0003), "derealization" and "depersonalization" (p < .007), "alterations of the sense of time" (p < .03), "thought disorder" (p < .0003), "loss of thought-control" (p < .01), "loss of body control" (p < .006), "changed meaning of percepts" (p < .0002), and "facilitated imagination" (p < .01). The decrease for "frightening derealization" did not reach significance (p ≈ .06). On the AM mood scales, MDMA increased "heightened mood" (p < .03), "self-confidence" (p < .02), "extroversion" (p < .01), and unexpectedly also "introversion" (p < .05), along with "emotional excitability" (p < .01), "sensitivity" (p < .03) and "thoughtfulness-contemplativeness" (p < .002). MDMA reduced "tiredness" (p < .05) and increased "dazed state" (p < .02), while leaving "aggression-anger", "apprehension-anxiety", and "depressiveness" unchanged. Citalopram pretreatment significantly reduced MDMA-induced increases in "self-confidence" (p < .04) and "extroversion" (p < .01) to levels comparable with citalopram alone; "efficiency-activation" under MDMA was also reduced by citalopram (p < .03). Several other MDMA-induced score changes trended toward reversal with citalopram, but increases in "emotional excitability" and "sensitivity" were not attenuated. The authors report that citalopram reduced the MDMA psychological profile by roughly 60% on average. Cardiovascular and startle-measure effects were assessed but reported separately; the extracted text does note that citalopram produced side effects such as nausea in some subjects (mentioned as 6/16 in the Discussion) and that citalopram alone affected some mood scales.

Discussion

Liechti and colleagues interpret the findings as supporting a primary role for carrier-mediated 5-HT release in MDMA's acute psychological effects. MDMA produced an entactogen-like profile—enhanced mood, increased sociability and self-confidence, moderate derealization/depersonalization, thought disorder without frank psychosis, and intensified sensory perception—but these effects were substantially attenuated by pretreatment with the selective serotonin uptake inhibitor citalopram. The authors argue that this attenuation is consistent with preclinical data showing that SSRIs block MDMA-induced 5-HT release, and that citalopram's high selectivity for the 5-HT transporter makes an interaction at that site the most plausible explanation. At the same time, the investigators acknowledge that citalopram only reduced MDMA effects by about 60%, indicating additional mechanisms beyond 5-HT release. They discuss possible contributors including direct actions at postsynaptic 5-HT2A/2C receptors, DA and norepinephrine (NE) release and receptor-mediated effects, and MDMA affinity for several receptor types. The persistence of MDMA-induced "emotional excitability" and "sensitivity" despite citalopram pretreatment is offered as potential evidence for DA or NE involvement. The authors further note that MDMA's ability to alter perception may involve 5-HT2 receptor activation and that MDMA stimulates DA release in striatum, which may be amplified by 5-HT-mediated mechanisms. Methodological and interpretative caveats are acknowledged. Nonspecific side effects of citalopram, such as fatigue, headache and nausea, could have reduced some pleasurable aspects of the MDMA experience, although the investigators consider it unlikely that these effects alone account for the broad attenuation observed. The prolongation of subjective MDMA effects with citalopram pretreatment (from about 3 to 5 hours) is discussed; possible explanations include metabolic interactions via CYP2D6 inhibition by citalopram, delayed 5-HT efflux because of transporter competition, or transporter regulatory effects such as phosphorylation/sequestration. The authors also compare their controlled findings with a small retrospective case series that reported minimal change when fluoxetine preceded Ecstasy, suggesting differences in SSRI dose, SSRI identity, MDMA dose and the uncontrolled nature of the prior reports likely explain the discrepancy. Finally, the study's implications for future research are outlined. The authors conclude that human pharmacological challenge studies with MDMA and selective receptor ligands can help clarify the neurochemical substrates of mood regulation and the role of serotonergic and other systems in affective processes. They recommend further investigations using specific receptor antagonists/agonists to dissect the contributions of postsynaptic 5-HT2, DA and NE receptors to MDMA's psychological effects.

View full paper sections

METHODS

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich and the use of MDMA by the Swiss Federal Health Office (BAG), Department of Pharmacology and Narcotics, Berne.

RESULTS

All data were analyzed with STATISTICA/w™ (Stat-Soft™). Before using parametric tests, all data were checked for normal distribution by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. The effect of MDMA on the scales of the ASC was assessed by MANOVA with placebo and MDMA as within-subject factors. To confirm a specific inhibiting effect of citalopram pretreatment on the MDMA-induced psychological changes, we used twoway ANOVA with pretreatment (placebo vs citalopram) and treatment (placebo vs MDMA) as within-subject factors (repeated measures). Tukey's post hoc tests were done to compare changes in subscores. AM scores were assessed using nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pairs tests due to the small number of items in the different scales with discrete and non-normally distributed data. The criterion for significance was set at p Ͻ .05.

CONCLUSION

MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) produced a state of enhanced mood characterized by feelings of happiness, euphoria, and in some subjects mania-like experience, as well as increased self-confidence and extroversion. Moderate derealization, depersonalization, and thought disorder occurred without anxiety or panic reactions. Thought disorder included accelerated thinking, thought blocking and impaired decision making, but there was no evidence of delusional thinking. MDMA did not produce hallucinations but did elicit an intensification of visual, tactile, and acoustic perception as well as changes in the meaning of the surroundings. There was only a slight increase in psychomotor drive. In combination with other reports, the present results support the classification of MDMA as an "entactogen", differentiating it from classical stimulants and hallucinogens. The main result of this study is that the psychoactive effects of 1.5 mg/kg MDMA were substantially attenuated by pretreatment with the SSRI citalopram (40 mg iv). Citalopram inhibited most of the psychological effects of MDMA. MDMA-induced increases in positive mood, derealization and depersonalization phenomena, thought disorder, and the loss of thought and body control were all attenuated by citalopram pretreatment. MDMA-evoked intensification of sensory perception, changes in the meaning of percepts, and subjectively facilitated imagination were also inhibited by citalopram as compared to MDMA alone. Citalopram alone also lowered scores on some scales compared to placebo. Most of these changes, however, were clearly due to side effects of citalopram such as fatigue, headache, and nausea, which influenced the mood rating. MDMA also produced marked increases in emotional excitability and sensitivity that, however, were not reduced by citalopram. To our knowledge, this is the first controlled study in humans investigating the potential inhibition of psychological MDMA effects by a selective serotonin uptake inhibitor. McCann and Ricaurte published a case series of four Ecstasy users, three of whom reported no appreciable change in subjective experience when fluoxetine was taken before Ecstasy. A possible explanation for the discrepancy between that finding and our results may be due to the fact that we used a high dose of citalopram, 40 mg iv, compared to 20 mg fluoxetine orally. At the same time our dose range of MDMA was 80 to 120 mg, compared to an estimated dose of 100 to 250 mg in the report of McCann and Ricaurte. In addition, one of the subjects from this series viewed fluoxetine as a "buffer" for the effect of Ecstasy, which indicates a reducing effect similar to our findings. Finally, these retrospective reports are limited given their uncontrolled nature, the small sample size, and the lack of drug identification. The overall attenuation of the psychological profile of MDMA by citalopram in our study is in agreement with a large number of preclinical investigations suggesting that MDMA primarily produces a carrier-mediated 5-HT release. MDMA releases 5-HT in vitro from synaptosomesand from cultured neurons, as well as in vivo. MDMA-induced 5-HT release is blocked by different 5-HT uptake inhibitors in vitroand in vivo as demonstrated by microdialysis. Moreover, MDMA has been shown to inhibit [ 3 H] serotonin transport into vesicles and to inhibit competitively the binding of [ 3 H] imipramine to platelet membrane vesicles containing the imipramine-sensitive serotonin carrier. These results suggest that MDMA interacts with the 5-HT uptake site, causing 5-HT release that might be due to 5-HT-MDMA exchange through the carrier. Non-specific untoward effects of citalopram such as nausea in some subjects (6/16) might have reduced some of the pleasurable MDMA effects but are unlikely to explain the reduction of the different psychological MDMA-effects seen in all subjects in this study. Furthermore, in the same subjects, citalopram also signifi-cantly reduced cardiovascular responses to MDMA and its effect on sensorimotor gating, but had no effect when given aloneThe serotonin uptake inhibitor citalopram reducesEffects of MDMA (Ecstasy) on prepulse inhibition and habituation of startle in humans after pretreatment with citalopram, haloperidol, or kertanserin, submitted). Therefore, the fact that we could partially block the psychological effects of MDMA with citalopram seems to indicate a specific interaction of citalopram and MDMA at the 5-HT uptake site. Citalopram is presently the most selective SSRI available. It competitively binds to the 5-HT uptake site with high affinity (K i ϭ 0.7 -1,8 nM) and exhibits very low affinity for other receptors. We can assume that citalopram either prevented the interaction of MDMA with the 5-HT uptake site or, alternatively, blocked the efflux of 5-HT through the carrier. However, citalopram only attenuated the effects of MDMA by about 60% in this study. This finding does not appear to be due to an insufficient dose because we gave 40 mg citalopram to all subjects regardless of their body weight and found no correlation between the dose of citalopram per kg and its inhibiting effect on the MDMA experience. Second, in a pilot study, doses of 60 and 80 mg citalopram were administered prior to MDMA in two candidates and both doses blocked the psychological effects of MDMA to a degree comparable to 40 mg. Therefore, we conclude that citalopram blocked only part of the MDMA effect, suggesting that MDMA has actions in addition to its effects at the 5-HT uptake site. Based on preclinical evidence several other mechanisms of action should be taken into account. The pharmacological profile of MDMA demonstrates a broad range of affinities for various brain recognition sites. MDMA has highest affinity for the 5-HT uptake site (Ͻ1M) with lower but comparable affinities at 5-HT 2 , ␣ 2 -adrenergic, M 1 cholinergic and H 1 histamine receptors (K i values Ͻ 6 M). S(ϩ) and R(-) MDMA both possess activity at 5-HT 2C receptors and R(-) MDMA also at 5-HT 2A receptors. First 5-HT 2A receptor stimulation has been implicated in the psychological and particularly in the visual effects of indole hallucinogens. Therefore, part of the effects of MDMA on perception, such as the intensification of colors, might be mediated by direct activation of these receptors. In addition, 5-HT 2C receptors are involved in mediating some of the effect of the serotonin releaser fenfluramine, another amphetamine derivative. Second, MDMA has been shown to induce the release of striatal DA. This release is probably due in part to a direct interaction of MDMA with the DA-carrier), but there is also evidence that the concomitant MDMA-induced release of 5-HT amplifies DA release through activation of postsynaptic 5-HT 2 receptors. If these mechanisms extend to humans, then citalopram in our study would be expected to block this amplification by preventing 5-HT release, while having no effect on MDMA-induced carrier-mediated DA release and its psychological manifestations. Third, MDMA has considerable affinity for the norepinephrine (NE) uptake site. Indeed, its potency at the NE uptake site is comparable to that at the 5-HT uptake siteand MDMA has been shown to induce NE release from hippocampal slices. Moreover, MDMA produced EEG frequency band changes very similar to the NE uptake inhibitor tandamine (Frei E, Gamma A,Localization of MDMA-induced electric brain activity in healthy volunteers using Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA), submitted). In the present study elevated "emotional excitability" produced by MDMA might be a manifestation of MDMA-induced DA or NE release since it was not prevented by citalopram pretreatment. In sum, several receptors and biological interactions may be involved in mediating the unique psychological profile of MDMA. Hence considerably more research is needed to clarify the mechanisms and sites of action of MDMA in humans. Another interesting finding is that in this study citalopram attenuated the acute psychological effects of MDMA, but at the same time prolonged them by up to two hours compared to MDMA alone. This finding might be explained by a metabolic interaction, since citalopram and MDMA are both substrates of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes in the liver. Citalopram is an inhibitor of CYP2D6, which is involved in the metabolism of MDMA. Citalopram could have prolonged the presence of MDMA in the blood, thereby delaying subjective effects. This argument is weakened, however, by the report that doses of 1.5 mg/kg MDMA produced peak blood levels of 330 ng/ml after 120 min and levels of 150 ng/ml lasting over nine hours. Thus, effective plasma levels of MDMA appear to outlast its psychological effects. Therefore, citalopram might also simply delay the release of 5-HT by competition with MDMA at the uptake site. In addition, there is also recent evidence that citalopram interacts with psychostimulants at the level of 5-HT transporter phosphorylation and sequestration) that regulate 5-HT transporter capacity. In conclusion, the present double-blind placebo-controlled study demonstrated that pretreatment with the SSRI citalopram attenuated the acute psychological effects of MDMA in healthy humans by about 60 percent. This finding suggests that the psychoactive properties of MDMA are largely dependent on an action at the 5-HT uptake site, a finding in line with preclinical evidence. However, 5-HT release is only one of the actions of MDMA and the involvement of postsynaptic sites such as 5-HT and DA receptors in mediating the psychological effects of MDMA remain unclear. Further investigations in humans using specific receptor ligands are necessary especially to assess the contribution of postsynaptic 5-HT 2 , DA and NE receptors in the mediation of MDMA effects. Finally, our findings suggest that human studies with MDMA and specific receptor ligands are useful to elucidate the neurochemical mechanisms underlying the serotonergic regulation of mood and its role in affective disorders.

Study Details

Your Library