Anxiety DisordersHealthy VolunteersLSDLSD

A low dose of lysergic acid diethylamide decreases pain perception in healthy volunteers

A single low dose of LSD (20 µg) produced a significant, protracted analgesic effect in healthy volunteers, increasing cold‑pressor pain tolerance and reducing subjective pain and unpleasantness without inducing a full psychedelic experience. Mild elevations in blood pressure and slight increases in dissociation, anxiety and somatisation were observed, supporting further investigation of low‑dose LSD as an analgesic in patient populations.

Authors

  • Patrick C. Dolder

Published

Journal of Psychopharmacology
individual Study

Abstract

Background: Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is an ergot alkaloid derivative with psychedelic properties that has been implicated in the management of persistent pain. Clinical studies in the 1960s and 1970s have demonstrated profound analgesic effects of full doses of LSD in terminally ill patients, but this line of research evaporated after LSD was scheduled worldwide. Aim: The present clinical study is the first to revisit the potential of LSD as an analgesic, and at dose levels which are not expected to produce profound mind-altering effects. Methods: Twenty-four healthy volunteers received single doses of 5, 10 and 20 µg LSD as well as placebo on separate occasions. A Cold Pressor Test was administered at 1.5 and 5 h after treatment administration to assess pain tolerance to experimentally evoked pain. Ratings of dissociation and psychiatric symptoms as well as assessments of vital signs were included to monitor mental status as well as safety during treatments. Results: LSD 20 µg significantly increased the time that participants were able to tolerate exposure to cold (3°C) water and decreased their subjective levels of experienced pain and unpleasantness. LSD elevated mean blood pressure within the normal range and slightly increased ratings of dissociation, anxiety and somatization. Conclusion: The present study provides evidence of a protracted analgesic effect of LSD at a dose that is low enough to avoid a psychedelic experience. The present data warrant further research into the analgesic effects of low doses of LSD in patient populations.

Unlocked with Blossom Pro

Research Summary of 'A low dose of lysergic acid diethylamide decreases pain perception in healthy volunteers'

Results

Analyses were performed with SPSS 25. Cold Pressor Test (CPT) parameters and vital signs were analysed using a univariate general linear model (GLM) that included Treatment (four levels: placebo and three LSD doses), Time after treatment (either 2 or 10 levels, as reported), the interaction Treatment × Time after treatment, and Participant as a random factor (N=24). Baseline-adjusted measures from the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS) were analysed with the same GLM structure but without a Time factor. The authors reported conducting mean-contrast tests comparing each LSD dose against placebo to determine dose-specific effects. Canonical correlation analyses were used to examine multivariate associations between a set of pain measures (pain tolerance, painfulness, unpleasantness) and sets of physiological or psychological measures (systolic and diastolic blood pressure; depersonalisation and derealisation). The threshold for statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Conclusion

The authors report that a single 20 µg dose of LSD produced a measurable analgesic effect in healthy volunteers, whereas lower doses (5 and 10 µg) did not. LSD 20 µg increased pain tolerance (immersion time in the CPT) by about 20% and reduced subjective ratings of painfulness and unpleasantness. The changes in pain tolerance and subjective pain were described as medium to large in effect size and the authors state these effects were statistically robust; they note that the differences between LSD 20 µg and placebo would remain significant after a conservative Bonferroni correction (p<0.016). The analgesic effect was present at both 1.5 and 5 hours after administration with no significant Treatment × Time interaction, indicating a sustained effect across that interval. On safety and other subjective effects, LSD 20 µg produced small increases in several psychological symptoms as measured by the BSI and CADSS, including anxiety, somatisation, amnesia, depersonalisation, derealisation and overall dissociation. LSD 10 µg increased derealisation and the total dissociation score. However, average CADSS and BSI ratings were reported to range from not present to mild, and the authors emphasise that dissociation following 20 µg was substantially lower than levels reported after typical analgesic doses of compounds such as ketamine or single-dose cannabis in other studies. Physiologically, LSD increased mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure most prominently at 20 µg, but mean changes were less than 10 mmHg relative to placebo and values remained within the normal range; heart rate was not affected. The authors examined possible mechanisms. A canonical association between reduced pain perception and increased dissociation across treatments was observed but explained only about 6% of variance, suggesting a weak relationship and indicating that attentional reorientation or self-transcendence might contribute only modestly to analgesia at these low doses. Canonical correlations between blood pressure measures and pain measures explained about 14% of variance, consistent with prior work on hypertension-associated hypoalgesia and suggesting that modest blood pressure increases could partly account for the analgesic effects via baroreceptor-mediated descending inhibitory pathways. The authors also note possible pharmacological mechanisms involving serotonergic receptors (5-HT2A partial agonism and 5-HT1A antagonism in the dorsal raphe) and call for further research on how LSD interacts with 5-HT and other neurotransmitter systems involved in nociception. The authors conclude that the present study provides evidence for a moderate and protracted analgesic effect of LSD at a dose low enough to largely avoid a psychedelic experience. They state this is the first controlled clinical study in many years to revisit LSD’s analgesic potential and that 20 µg appears to be the minimal effective dose in healthy volunteers. They recommend extended dose-finding studies (for example exploring a low to medium range such as 20–50 µg) to determine the optimal balance between efficacy and mental interference, replication in patient populations with persistent pain and comorbid conditions, and investigation of tolerance with repeated dosing. The authors suggest low-dose LSD may merit further exploration as a novel pharmacological therapy for pain that could avoid some sequelae associated with current mainstay drugs.

View full paper sections

RESULTS

Analyses were carried out by means of the SPSS 25 program series to investigate whether the effects of LSD doses differed from those of placebo. CPT parameters and vital signs were analyzed using a GLM univariate model that included the fixed factors Treatment (4 levels), Time (2 or 10 levels) after treatment and the interaction Treatment × Time after treatment, as well as the random factor Participant (N=24). Baseline adjusted parameters of the BSI and CADSS were analyzed in the same manner but without a factor Time. Mean contrast (LSD dose versus placebo) tests were conducted for measuring the significance of individual dose effects, relative to placebo. Canonical correlation analyses were conducted to understand the association between a set of measures of pain (i.e. pain tolerance, painfulness, unpleasantness) and a set of measures of blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) or dissociation (depersonalization and derealization). The alpha criterion for significance was set at p<0.05.

CONCLUSION

Controlled studies on the therapeutic potential of LSD in pain management are scarce and date back to the 1960s and 1970s, before LSD was placed into the most restrictive drug control schedule in many countries worldwide. Yet, despite the lack of clinical research over the last 50 years, the practice of self-medication with LSD to treat persistent pain continued. The present controlled clinical study is the first to revisit the potential of LSD as an analgesic in a very long time, and at dose levels that are not expected to produce relevant mind-altering effects. The latter is of importance, as this would increase the acceptability of a psychedelic drug in the management of pain. The current data consistently indicated that LSD 20 µg significantly reduced pain perception as compared with placebo, whereas lower doses of LSD did not. LSD 20 µg significantly increased pain tolerance (i.e. immersion time) by about 20%, while decreasing the subjective levels of experienced painfulness and unpleasantness. Changes in pain tolerance and subjective pain perception induced by LSD 20 µg were of medium to large effect size and comparable in magnitude to those observed with the CPT after administration of opioids, such as oxycodone 20 mgand morphine 10-20 mgto healthy volunteers. The findings were also statistically robust. All differences in pain perception between LSD 20 µg and placebo would also survive a conservative Bonferroni tests to correct for multiple comparisons (i.e. significance levels p<0.016), if applied. The reduction in subjective pain perception is remarkable, because it was measurable despite a prolonged exposure time to the pain stimulus in LSD 20 µg treatment condition. These phenomena, however, seem interrelated, as a reduction in subjective pain experience can explain why participants were able to tolerate pain for a longer period of time. The analgesic effects of LSD 20 µg were equally strong at 1.5 and 5 h after administration, as indicated by the lack of a Treatment × Time after treatment interaction. This speaks to a sustained efficacy profile for LSD which is fully in line with the well-established notion that pharmacological effects of LSD can be assessed up to 12 h after administration, even after low doses. The analgesic effects of LSD 20 µg therefore may outlast the 5 h time window that was applied in the current study. LSD also induced some psychological and physical symptoms as assessed by the BSI and CADSS. LSD 10 µg increased ratings of derealization and the total dissociation score. LSD 20 µg increased symptoms of anxiety, somatization, amnesia, depersonalization, derealization, and dissociation. These subjective data clearly indicate that even these low doses of LSD produced pharmacological effects that were noticeable to the participants. However, the magnitude of these effects was small. Average ratings of all CADSS and BSI components indicated that symptom severity ranged between not present and mild. Increments in level of dissociation that were observed in the present study were also much lower than those observed after regular doses of other compounds that have been implicated in pain management such as ketamine and cannabis. CADSS ratings of dissociation after single doses of cannabis and ketamine (van Heugten-were about 3 and 10 times higher than the level of dissociation produced LSD 20 µg in the present study. Recent studies on the behavioral effects of low doses of LSD also reported that cognitive function, mood, perception, and state of consciousness were not or only mildly affected by doses up to 26 µg LSD tartrate (i.e. equal to LSD 21 µg hydrate). Overall, these data suggest that the level of cognitive interference that is produced by LSD 20 µg is very mild and would not be expected to interfere with normal day-to-day operations. LSD also increased mean blood pressure but did not affect heart rate. Increments in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were most prominent after LSD 20 µg. Mean changes in blood pressure were less than 10 mmHg at any time point, as compared with placebo. Overall, however, levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout all treatment conditions were well within the normal range, suggesting that the impact of LSD on blood pressure is of limited clinical relevance. The present findings are in line with another recent studythat also reported that low doses of 13 and 26 µg LSD tartrate (corresponding to 11 and 21 µg LSD hydrate) produced small increments in blood pressure while not affecting heart rate and temperature. Elevations in blood pressure after LSD are well described and have been attributed to the vasoconstrictive properties of LSD. Previous studies have shown that full, psychedelic doses of LSD (i.e. 100 and 200 µg) produce more pronounced increments in blood pressure, but the current findings reveal the threshold dose at which LSD produces these effects. Overall, the physiological changes observed after low doses of LSD were mild and safe. At present, it is unclear how LSD may influence pain perception. Explanatory models have focused on pharmacological changes in the processing of nociceptive information or on psychological changes in coping with pain. The latter explanation suggests that LSD does not alter nociception and that reductions in subjective pain perception arise from attentional reorienting from pain sensation to the psychedelic experience of LSD. Alternatively, LSD may be analgesic by promoting self-transcendence, in much the same way that meditation-induced self-transcendence is; in essence, no self, no pain. Such analgesic mechanism might be most pronounced in moderate to high-dose LSD sessions, or potentially, in treatments that combine mindfulness meditation interventions with microdoses of LSD. In any of these scenarios one would expect the magnitude of pain relief to be intrinsically related to the intensity of the psychedelic experience. There was some evidence to support this view in the present study, as a significant canonical association was found between reduced levels of pain perception and increasing levels of dissociation across all treatments. This correlation, however, was relatively weak and explained only 6% of the variance, which is not surprising given that the levels of dissociation produced by LSD were almost negligible. But, these data do indicate that attentional reorientation or self-transcendence may contribute to some degree to the analgesic effect of LSD, even with low doses. The pharmacological view stresses the role of serotonin and 5HT 2A receptors in peripheral and centrally mediated pain processes. In vivo electrophysiology studies in rats suggest that LSD has partial agonist actions at 5-HT 2A receptors and full antagonistic action at 5-HT1A in the dorsal raphe, a structure known to be involved in actions of descending pain inhibitory processes. However, the relationship between 5-HT and additional neurotransmitter systems implicated in nociception and how their interconnectivity may be affected by LSD needs further research. An additional or alternative explanation for the analgesic effects of LSD could be hypertension-associated hypoalgesia. Previous studies in animals and humans have shown that blood pressure correlates positively with pain tolerance and negatively with the perception of the intensity of the painful stimulus in acute pain models such as the CPT, even when blood pressure fluctuations are within the normal range. Canonical correlations between measures of blood pressure and measures of pain confirmed these relationships in the present study and explained about 14% of the variance in pain levels across all treatment conditions. How alterations in blood pressure and perception of pain are related is poorly understood, but it has been suggested that pain activates the sympathetic nervous system with resulting increase in blood pressure, which, in turn, causes increased stimulation of baroreceptors that consecutively activate the inhibitory descending pathways that originate from the dorsal raphe nucleus and project to the spinal cord to release serotonin and reduce the perception of pain. The current data suggest that LSD might enhance this mechanism of pain alleviation either by increasing blood pressure or by stimulation of 5HT 1A and 5HT 2 receptors in the inhibitory descending pathways. The present study provides compelling evidence of a moderate and protracted analgesic effect of LSD at a dose that is low enough to avoid a psychedelic experience. The study revealed the minimal dose at which analgesic activity of LSD is effective. Yet, an extended dose-finding study is needed to determine the dose at which analgesic effects of LSD are optimal, i.e. when efficacy is maximal and mental interference is minimal. Such a study could potentially explore the trade-off between increments in treatment efficacy and psychedelic symptoms in a low to medium dose range (i.e. 20-50 µg LSD). Further research is also needed to replicate the current findings in patient populations who suffer from persistent pain, and comorbid neuropsychiatric ailments, and to determine the potential for tolerance development after repeated dosing. The present data suggest that low doses of LSD might constitute a novel pharmacological therapy that can be efficacious in patients and is devoid of problematic sequelae that are associated with current mainstay drugs, such as opioids. In conclusion, the present study provides evidence for analgesic activity of LSD in healthy volunteers at doses that are low enough to avoid physiological or mental challenges. The present data warrant further research into the analgesic effects of low doses of LSD in patient populations.

Study Details

Your Library